ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#4065] Surprise in Time#sec — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>

This bit me:

7 messages 2005/01/01

[#4088] Re: Surprise in Time#sec — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/04

Hi,

[#4094] Re: Surprise in Time#sec — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2005/01/04

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#4083] Re: Surprise in Time#sec — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2005/01/04

Steven Jenkins wrote:

[#4087] Re: Surprise in Time#sec — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/04

Hi,

[#4092] Re: Surprise in Time#sec — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2005/01/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4095] Re: Surprise in Time#sec — Bill Atkins <batkins57@...> 2005/01/04

Is that a pun? :)

[#4067] Segfault in Thread#initialize / caller — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

7 messages 2005/01/01

[#4068] Re: [BUG] Segfault in Thread#initialize / caller — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/01/01

Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> writes:

[#4071] Re: [BUG] Segfault in Thread#initialize / caller — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/02

Hi,

[#4073] Re: [BUG] Segfault in Thread#initialize / caller — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/02

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#4074] Re: [BUG] Segfault in Thread#initialize / caller — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/02

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:

[#4098] Re: [BUG] Segfault in Thread#initialize / caller — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/04

Hi,

[#4069] Re: [BUG] Segfault in Thread#initialize / caller — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/02

>>>>> "F" == Florian Gro=DF?= <ISO-8859-1> writes:

[#4075] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/01/03

[#4078] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2005/01/03

Hello,

[#4076] Ruby/DL — Jamis Buck <jamis_buck@...>

I recently used Ruby/DL to create bindings to the SQLite3 embedded

40 messages 2005/01/03

[#4096] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/04

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:53:49AM +0900, Jamis Buck wrote:

[#4099] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/04

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4119] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:48AM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4120] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/05

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4121] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/05

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:

[#4125] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:10:34AM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4128] Re: Ruby/DL — Bill Atkins <batkins57@...> 2005/01/05

I'm no C expert, so this may be completely inapplicable, but what

[#4139] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/06

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:49:00AM +0900, Bill Atkins wrote:

[#4133] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/06

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4140] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/06

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:57:57PM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4141] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/06

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4143] Re: Ruby/DL — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/06

On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:06:16AM +0900, ts wrote:

[#4144] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/06

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4145] Re: Ruby/DL — Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...> 2005/01/06

ts wrote:

[#4147] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/06

>>>>> "T" == Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@ttsky.net> writes:

[#4149] Re: Ruby/DL — Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...> 2005/01/06

ts wrote:

[#4155] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/07

>>>>> "T" == Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@ttsky.net> writes:

[#4157] Re: Ruby/DL — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/07

Hi,

[#4158] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/07

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#4160] Re: Ruby/DL — Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...> 2005/01/07

ts wrote:

[#4134] Re: Ruby/DL — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/06

[#4137] Re: Ruby/DL — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/06

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4142] Re: Ruby/DL — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/06

[#4150] Re: Ruby/DL — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/06

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4164] Re: Ruby/DL — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/08

[#4168] Re: Ruby/DL — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/01/09

On Jan 6, 2005, at 4:07 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4170] Re: Ruby/DL — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/09

[#4103] Re: Ruby/DL — Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...> 2005/01/04

Jamis,

[#4105] Re: Ruby/DL — "Tom Copeland" <tom@...> 2005/01/04

> Now I'm developing Ruby/DL2 to replace Ruby/DL with it. It

[#4106] Re: Ruby/DL — Jamis Buck <jamis_buck@...> 2005/01/04

On 04:34 Wed 05 Jan , Takaaki Tateishi wrote:

[#4108] Re: Ruby/DL — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/04

Takaaki Tateishi wrote:

[#4135] Re: Ruby/DL — Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...> 2005/01/06

Florian Growrote:

[#4138] Re: Ruby/DL — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/06

Takaaki Tateishi wrote:

[#4171] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/10

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#4172] Re: Ruby/DL — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/10

Hi,

[#4173] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/10

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#4174] Re: Ruby/DL — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/10

Hi,

[#4176] Re: Ruby/DL — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/10

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#4177] Re: Ruby/DL — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/10

Hi,

[#4080] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/01/03

[#4111] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2005/01/05

Hello,

[#4101] irb does not work with the latest 1.8 CVS ruby — noreply@...

Bugs item #1271, was opened at 2005-01-04 21:03

1 message 2005/01/04

[#4110] error in test_kernel_open(PathNameTest) with cvs head on mingw — noreply@...

Bugs item #1273, was opened at 04-01-2005 23:40

1 message 2005/01/04

[#4114] Big Float literal results Infinity — noreply@...

Bugs item #1274, was opened at 2005-01-05 16:23

1 message 2005/01/05

[#4116] Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

Any test code that depends upon modifications of $: fails when used

10 messages 2005/01/05

[#4185] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/11

Hi,

[#4188] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/01/11

On 11 Jan 2005, at 04:14, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#4231] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/01/14

On 11 Jan 2005, at 09:39, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#4240] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...> 2005/01/15

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:06:10 +0900, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#4325] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...> 2005/01/27

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:48:58 -0500, Nathaniel Talbott

[#4331] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...> 2005/01/30

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:17:14 -0500, Nathaniel Talbott

[#4340] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...> 2005/01/31

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:41:31 -0500, Nathaniel Talbott

[#4342] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/01/31

On 31 Jan 2005, at 10:46, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#4181] Re: Test::Unit::Collector::Dir won't work with code that modifies $LOAD_PATH — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/01/10

On 05 Jan 2005, at 00:00, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#4117] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/01/05

[#4118] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 12:34:27AM +0900, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#4123] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/01/05

[#4124] Re: [BUG] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/05

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 05:11:36AM +0900, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#4146] The face of Unicode support in the future — Charles O Nutter <headius@...>

Hello Rubyists!

47 messages 2005/01/06

[#4152] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/07

Hi,

[#4167] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/01/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#4201] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/01/12

Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#4203] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/12

Hi,

[#4216] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/01/13

Note: this message contains UTF-8 characters.

[#4217] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/13

Hi,

[#4175] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/10

Hi,

[#4178] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Charles O Nutter <headius@...> 2005/01/10

Here's a feature that hasn't been mentioned, so perhaps it already

[#4179] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/10

Will the built-in String support Unicode?

[#4182] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/11

Hi,

[#4186] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/11

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:53:48PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4192] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/12

Hi,

[#4234] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — William Morgan <wmorgan-ruby-core@...> 2005/01/14

On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:13:35PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4235] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/15

Hi,

[#4193] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/12

Paul's recent mail and Matz's response explain much of

[#4194] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/12

Hi,

[#4195] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4196] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/12

Hi,

[#4209] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/13

[#4197] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4198] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/01/12

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:12:14 +0900, Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> wrote:

[#4199] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2005/01/12

On Wednesday 12 January 2005 09:19 am, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#4212] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/13

[#4211] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/13

[#4210] Re: optimisations (was: unicode) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/13

[#4218] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2005/01/13

On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:13:35PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4219] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/13

Hi,

[#4220] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2005/01/13

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:03:36AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4221] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/13

[#4228] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/14

[#4230] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/01/14

On Friday 14 January 2005 05:18, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4224] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2005/01/13

On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:13:35PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4225] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/14

Hi,

[#4207] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/12

[#4208] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/12

Hi,

[#4229] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/14

[#4153] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/07

[#4154] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/01/07

ditto here. having [0] result in a

[#4202] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/12

[#4156] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/07

Hi,

[#4159] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/01/07

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:28:51 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto

[#4166] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/08

Hi,

[#4169] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — "Josef 'Jupp' Schugt" <jupp@...> 2005/01/09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#4204] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/12

[#4205] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/12

Hi,

[#4206] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...> 2005/01/12

Hi,

[#4180] rdoc crashes on stock Mandrake 10.1 Official — noreply@...

Bugs item #1319, was opened at 2005-01-10 14:59

1 message 2005/01/10

[#4183] change in %w{} in 1.8? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

3 messages 2005/01/11

[#4184] Re: change in %w{} in 1.8? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/11

Hi,

[#4187] Re: change in %w{} in 1.8? — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/11

Hi,

[#4189] Authenticated proxy support for open-uri — Neil Kohl <nakohl@...>

Hello!

3 messages 2005/01/11

[#4190] Re: [PATCH] Authenticated proxy support for open-uri — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/01/12

In article <7530f5cc0501111341480d7450@mail.gmail.com>,

[#4191] Re: [PATCH] Authenticated proxy support for open-uri — Neil Kohl <nakohl@...> 2005/01/12

Unfortunately with scripts that need network access via an

[#4200] static extension / make distclean — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2005/01/12

[#4213] FL_USER* flags — Charles Mills <cmills@...>

Which of the FL_USER flags can be used by extension writers (when

3 messages 2005/01/13

[#4214] Re: FL_USER* flags — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/13

Hi,

[#4215] Re: FL_USER* flags — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2005/01/13

On Jan 12, 2005, at 7:46 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4222] Re: Segfault in timer.rb — Erlend Oye <segfault.ruby-talk@...>

Erlend Oye wrote:

3 messages 2005/01/13

[#4244] Re: Segfault in timer.rb — Erlend Oye <segfault.ruby-talk@...> 2005/01/15

>

[#4253] Re: Segfault in timer.rb — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/16

>>>>> "E" == Erlend Oye <segfault.ruby-talk@spamgourmet.com> writes:

[#4223] Re: Segfault in timer.rb (segfault: message 13 of 20) — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "S" == Seg Fault <junkblocker@yahoo.com> writes:

1 message 2005/01/13

[#4226] patch to date.rb — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

If date.rb is loaded twice, the second load raises NameError.

2 messages 2005/01/14

[#4359] Re: patch to date.rb — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/02/03

pretty please?

[#4227] Makefile broken wrt parallelism and configure.in — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

touch configure.in array.c; make -j 4

1 message 2005/01/14

[#4232] Carriage return on shebang — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin.

6 messages 2005/01/14

[#4236] Re: [BUG] Carriage return on shebang — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/15

Moin,

[#4237] Re: [BUG] Carriage return on shebang — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/15

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#4239] Re: [BUG] Carriage return on shebang — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/15

Moin,

[#4241] Re: [BUG] Carriage return on shebang — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/15

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#4238] Re: [BUG] Carriage return on shebang — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/15

Hi,

[#4233] Ruby/DL2: call for reviews — Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...>

Hello,

1 message 2005/01/14

[#4242] tracer.rb: Do not list pseudo source lines of binary extensions — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin.

5 messages 2005/01/15

[#4246] Re: [PATCH] tracer.rb: Do not list pseudo source lines of binary extensions — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/16

Moin,

[#4252] Re: [PATCH] tracer.rb: Do not list pseudo source lines of binary extensions — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/16

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#4254] Re: [PATCH] tracer.rb: Do not list pseudo source lines of binary extensions — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/16

Moin,

[#4255] Re: [PATCH] tracer.rb: Do not list pseudo source lines of binary extensions — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/16

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#4243] Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2005/01/15

[#4248] Re: Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/01/16

In article <41E93F42.9090705@ntecs.de>,

[#4249] Thread misbehavior — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/16

Follow Rubyists:

[#4259] Re: Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2005/01/16

Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#4365] Re: Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/02/05

In article <41EAB707.7020808@ntecs.de>,

[#4366] Re: Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb — "Alexey I. Froloff" <sir_raorn@...> 2005/02/05

* Tanaka Akira <akr@> [050205 17:25]:

[#4410] Re: Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/02/10

In article <20050205142822.GC16115@hell.immo.ru>,

[#4386] Re: Patch that enables https in open-uri.rb — Paul Duncan <pabs@...> 2005/02/07

* Alexey I. Froloff (sir_raorn@immo.ru) wrote:

[#4247] Re: Segfault in timer.rb — Erlend Oye <segfault.ruby-talk@...>

Alexander Kellett wrote:

2 messages 2005/01/16

[#4260] Re: Segfault in timer.rb — Erlend Oye <segfault.ruby-talk@...> 2005/01/16

Ville Mattila wrote:

[#4250] irb completion patch — "Cs. Henk" <csaba-ml@...>

Hi!

2 messages 2005/01/16

[#4251] Re: irb completion patch — "Cs. Henk" <csaba-ml@...> 2005/01/16

On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:20:20PM +0900, Cs. Henk wrote:

[#4256] Typo in lib/uri/common.rb — noreply@...

Bugs item #1350, was opened at 16/01/2005 15:51

3 messages 2005/01/16

[#4257] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1350 ] Typo in lib/uri/common.rb — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/16

>>>>> "n" == noreply <noreply@rubyforge.org> writes:

[#4258] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1350 ] Typo in lib/uri/common.rb — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2005/01/16

On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 10:03, ts wrote:

[#4261] What do when when T_DATA is redefined? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2005/01/17

[#4271] Re: What do when when T_DATA is redefined? — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/18

Hi,

[#4263] Re: What do when when T_DATA is redefined? — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/17

>>>>> "B" == Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> writes:

[#4262] Re: What do when when T_DATA is redefined? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2005/01/17

[#4264] Re: What do when when T_DATA is redefined? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/01/17

[#4265] Re: What do when when T_DATA is redefined? — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/17

>>>>> "B" == Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> writes:

[#4266] PHP ERB — Patrick May <patrick@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2005/01/17

[#4267] Re: PHP ERB — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2005/01/17

Hello,

[#4268] alias of writer in struct — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

1 message 2005/01/18

[#4269] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>

19 messages 2005/01/18

[#4270] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/18

Hi,

[#4275] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...> 2005/01/19

[#4276] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/19

Wes Nakamura wrote:

[#4277] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2005/01/19

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Florian Growrote:

[#4288] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2005/01/20

On Wednesday 19 January 2005 08:23 am, Florian Groß wrote:

[#4278] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/19

Hi,

[#4279] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4280] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/19

Hi,

[#4281] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4284] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/20

Hi,

[#4282] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...> 2005/01/19

[#4283] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/19

Wes Nakamura wrote:

[#4285] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/20

Hi,

[#4286] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...> 2005/01/20

[#4287] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/20

Hi,

[#4291] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com> 2005/01/20

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4292] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/20

Hi,

[#4300] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/21

In message "Re: The face of Unicode support in the future"

[#4272] Re: What do when when T_DATA is redefined? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

2 messages 2005/01/18

[#4274] Re: What do when when T_DATA is redefined? — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2005/01/18

On Jan 18, 2005, at 8:29 AM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#4273] Bug: backquotes report error — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>

Hi,

1 message 2005/01/18

[#4290] Building ruby 1.8.2 with static extensions on Windows XP — "David Craine" <dave@...>

I have been trying to build ruby 1.8.2 on Windows XP and attempting to get

3 messages 2005/01/20

[#4294] Re: Building ruby 1.8.2 with static extensions on Windows XP — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2005/01/20

Hello,

[#4297] Re: Building ruby 1.8.2 with static extensions on Windows XP — "David Craine" <dave@...> 2005/01/20

That worked great. Thanks.

[#4293] Memory leak in Generator — noreply@...

Bugs item #1364, was opened at 2005-01-20 18:38

2 messages 2005/01/20

[#4295] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1364 ] Memory leak in Generator — ts <decoux@...> 2005/01/20

>>>>> "n" == noreply <noreply@rubyforge.org> writes:

[#4296] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2005/01/20

[#4299] Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/21

Hi,

[#4373] Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2005/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-01-21 17:43]:

[#4375] Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/02/06

[#4301] Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2005/01/21

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> [2005-01-21 17:43]:

[#4303] Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2005/01/23

On Jan 21, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:

[#4304] Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/23

Hi,

[#4307] Re: [PATCH] parse_c.rb: allow whitespace after function names — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2005/01/23

On Jan 23, 2005, at 1:41 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4298] Re: The face of Unicode support in the future — "trans." <transami@...>

On Wednesday 19 January 2005 11:14 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

1 message 2005/01/21

[#4302] RDoc parse_rb.rb: Logic for def Builtin.method() end — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin.

1 message 2005/01/22

[#4305] Looking for some help — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

Folks:

1 message 2005/01/23

[#4306] YAML.load 'true' with multibyte characters bug — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <zn@...>

Hello,

1 message 2005/01/23

[#4308] RSS traceback on Ubuntu Linux — Francis Hwang <sera@...>

I just got a tech-support email from somebody using FeedBlender, and

3 messages 2005/01/23

[#4309] Re: RSS traceback on Ubuntu Linux — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/01/24

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:30:06 +0900, Francis Hwang <sera@fhwang.net> wrote:

[#4320] Re: RSS traceback on Ubuntu Linux — Paul Duncan <pabs@...> 2005/01/26

* Austin Ziegler (halostatue@gmail.com) wrote:

[#4310] Parsing bug? — George Ogata <g_ogata@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2005/01/24

[#4319] Re: Parsing bug? — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2005/01/26

On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 06:14:41AM +0900, George Ogata wrote:

[#4311] RFE: Enumerable#group_by, Array#^ — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin.

7 messages 2005/01/24

[#4313] Re: RFE: Enumerable#group_by, Array#^ — Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...> 2005/01/24

Hi,

[#4315] Re: RFE: Enumerable#group_by, Array#^ — Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...> 2005/01/24

Hi,

[#4314] Re: RFE: Enumerable#group_by, Array#^ — Tim Sutherland <timsuth@...> 2005/01/24

On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 06:22:12AM +0900, Florian Gro? wrote:

[#4317] Re: RFE: Enumerable#group_by, Array#^ — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/24

Tim Sutherland wrote:

[#4312] Re: RFE: Enumerable#group_by, Array#^ — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2005/01/24

Florian Growrote:

[#4316] Re: RFE: Enumerable#group_by, Array#^ — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/24

Michael Neumann wrote:

[#4318] YAML.load({nil=>1}.to_yaml) raises exception — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2005/01/25

[#5546] Re: YAML.load({nil=>1}.to_yaml) raises exception — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2005/08/10

Hi,

[#4321] Inconsistent use of st_foreach — noreply@...

Bugs item #1396, was opened at 2005-01-26 21:10

2 messages 2005/01/27

[#4322] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1396 ] Inconsistent use of st_foreach — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/27

Hi,

[#4323] test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception in a test method, as follows.

14 messages 2005/01/27

[#8773] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/09/02

In article <87is5jb46q.fsf@serein.a02.aist.go.jp>,

[#8776] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...> 2006/09/03

On 9/1/06, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#8777] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/03

On Sep 2, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#8778] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/09/03

In article <A604C0B3-95ED-4B9B-866C-79A2C7D5E3C4@segment7.net>,

[#8779] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/03

On Sep 2, 2006, at 9:39 PM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#8780] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/09/03

In article <622DAC7E-55DB-4854-B82B-A037CE9C75EF@segment7.net>,

[#8782] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/03

On Sep 2, 2006, at 11:43 PM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#8783] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/09/03

In article <87ac5hv4bo.fsf@fsij.org>,

[#8784] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/03

On Sep 3, 2006, at 8:21 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#8785] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/03

Hi,

[#8786] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/04

On Sep 3, 2006, at 12:59 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8799] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...> 2006/09/05

On 9/3/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#8816] Re: test/unit doesn't rescue a Exception — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/09

On Sep 5, 2006, at 6:19 AM, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#4324] Incorrect documentation for REXML::StreamListener#tag_start — noreply@...

Bugs item #1399, was opened at 2005-01-27 16:13

1 message 2005/01/27

[#4326] RDoc parse_c.rb for C ext libs consisting of many *.c files — sheepman <sheepman@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2005/01/28

[#4327] Re: RDoc parse_c.rb for C ext libs consisting of many *.c files — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2005/01/28

On Jan 28, 2005, at 4:16 AM, sheepman wrote:

[#4328] Re: RDoc parse_c.rb for C ext libs consisting of many *.c files — sheepman <sheepman@...> 2005/01/29

[#4329] Bug in IRB::Context#verbose? — noreply@...

Bugs item #1405, was opened at 2005-01-29 12:26

1 message 2005/01/29

[#4330] Typo in irb: --tracer doesn't work — Florian Frank <flori@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2005/01/29

[#4337] Re: Typo in irb: --tracer doesn't work — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/31

Hi,

[#4332] IO#clearerr missing in action — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

I wanted to implement tail(1) in ruby cleanly, but found the best I

4 messages 2005/01/30

[#4333] Re: [PATCH] IO#clearerr missing in action — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/01/30

In article <afb58459e78a4b10ffa76845c32d48d3@segment7.net>,

[#4343] Re: [PATCH] IO#clearerr missing in action — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/01/31

On 30 Jan 2005, at 01:01, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#4344] Re: [PATCH] IO#clearerr missing in action — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2005/02/01

In article <93e943b735aa76574c10b35088a04a39@segment7.net>,

[#4334] $VERBOSE breaks code? — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>

Hmm:

3 messages 2005/01/31

[#5123] Re: $VERBOSE breaks code? — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2005/05/30

Hello,

[#5161] Re: $VERBOSE breaks code? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/06/07

Hi,

[#4335] When will Object#type disappear? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

2 messages 2005/01/31

[#4336] Re: When will Object#type disappear? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/01/31

Hi,

[#4338] Attaching a block to [] — Brian Mitchell <binary42@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2005/01/31

[#4339] Re: Attaching a block to [] — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/01/31

Hi --

[#4341] RDoc: Show parsing progress for C files — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>

Hi,

1 message 2005/01/31

Building ruby 1.8.2 with static extensions on Windows XP

From: "David Craine" <dave@...>

Date: 2005-01-20 04:57:41 UTC

List: ruby-core #4290

I have been trying to build ruby 1.8.2 on Windows XP and attempting to get
the extensions linked statically.  I've commented in the extension names
listed in the Setup file in the ext dir; however, when the nmake process
gets to the point of creating the ruby.exe and rubyw.exe files it spits out
a fatal error as follows:

 

making ruby.exe, rubyw.exe

 

Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 7.10.3077

Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

 

        rc -I. -I.  -I../ruby-1.8.2/win32 -r -fomsvcrt-ruby18.res
msvcrt-ruby18.rc

 

        cl -nologo -LD main.obj  msvcrt-ruby18-static.lib msvcrt-ruby18.res
oldnames.lib user32.lib advapi32.lib wsock32.lib advapi32.lib kernel32.lib
wsock32.lib user32.lib uuid.lib oleaut32.lib ole32.lib  -Femsvcrt-ruby18.dll
-link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -link -incremental:no -debug
-opt:ref -opt:icf -dll  -def: -link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf
-dll  -def: -link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll  -def: -link
-incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll  -def: -link -incremental:no
-debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll  -def: -link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref
-opt:icf -dll  -def: -link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll
-def: -link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll  -def: -link
-incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll

-def: -link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll  -def: -link
-incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll  -def: -link -incremental:no
-debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll  -def: -link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref
-opt:icf -dll  -def: -link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll
-def: -link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll  -def: -link
-incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -o

pt:icf -dll  -def: -link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll
-def: -link -incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll  -def: -link
-incremental:no -debug -opt:ref -opt:icf -dll  -def: -def:msvcrt-ruby18.def

LINK : warning LNK4044: unrecognized option '/link'; ignored

LINK : fatal error LNK1146: no argument specified with option '/def:'

NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl' : return code '0x2'

Stop.

NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '.\miniruby.exe' : return code '0x2'

Stop.

 

The 'cl' line looks like something got mis-generated in the make file.  I've
been successful in building the dynamically linked version of ruby, just not
the static one.

 

My ultimate goal is to embed ruby into my own executable and to statically
link in the extensions there; but I wanted to see how ruby did it first.
Any ideas on what this problem may be?

 

Dave Craine

Thread

In This Thread

Prev Next