From: "Florian Groß" Date: 2005-01-06T09:41:14+09:00 Subject: Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? Peter wrote: > Funny thing: "1:10"methods calls String::Literal::methods("1:10") which > happily returns all methods in String::Literal. That's the downside of > using the unchanged suffix as method name. So maybe we should go back to the String.literal_methods style?