[#3861] super — ts <decoux@...>
[#3862] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Hi,
[#3881] mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...>
Hello,
[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>
The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Jos Backus wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:47:48AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0900, James Britt wrote:
[#3914] Pathname needs a makeover — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#3922] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — noreply@...
Bugs item #1173, was opened at 2004-12-08 17:35
[#3966] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
I still get this happening a lot with my Rubyx linux ruby script.
This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times
Hi,
[#3975] Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I believe these are the minimal patches needed to make it possible to
[#3982] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
[#4000] 1.8.2 preview4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello,
[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com
First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to
GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Francis Hwang wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
First of all, the entire discussion of when GET is appropriate
mde@state26.com wrote:
[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
Hi,
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more
>
Brent Roman wrote:
> Brent Roman wrote:
Brent Roman wrote:
> Florian Gross wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4040] Extensions, Internal — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>
Hi,
Re: curious about 1.8.2 change - empty method returns nil
On Dec 30, 2004, at 9:51 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > Hi, > > In message "Re: curious about 1.8.2 change - empty method returns nil" > on Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:06:15 +0900, Ryan Davis > <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> writes: > > | * parse.y (reduce_nodes): empty body should return nil. > | > |Curious, but what was this meant to solve? > > Try: > > def foo(a=5) > end > > p foo() Please forgive me. I may have missed some mail that went by in the past, but I still don't understand: & ruby16 -ve 'def foo(a=5); end; p foo()' ruby 1.6.8 (2002-12-24) [powerpc-darwin7.0] nil & ruby -ve 'def foo(a=5); end; p foo()' ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd4] nil & ruby -ve 'def foo(a=5); end; p foo()' ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-20) [powerpc-darwin7.7.0] nil To make sure, I checked the change logs between 11/15 and 11/29 (when the commit was made) to make sure I didn't skip over something relevant. I might have missed something though. Again, sorry for the trouble, I'm just trying to understand if I can tighten down our assertions on one of our projects.