[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>

The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO

17 messages 2004/12/06
[#3909] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/07

Hi,

[#3910] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/07

On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#3925] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/12/09

Jos Backus wrote:

[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com

First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to

17 messages 2004/12/23
[#4016] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2004/12/24

GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read

[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

35 messages 2004/12/27
[#4070] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/02

Hi,

[#4072] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/02

[#4079] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4081] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/03

[#4082] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4084] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/04

I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more

[#4086] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/04

[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2004/12/27

Re: curious about 1.8.2 change - empty method returns nil

From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2004-12-31 10:02:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #4063
On Dec 30, 2004, at 9:51 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: curious about 1.8.2 change - empty method returns nil"
>     on Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:06:15 +0900, Ryan Davis 
> <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> writes:
>
> |         * parse.y (reduce_nodes): empty body should return nil.
> |
> |Curious, but what was this meant to solve?
>
> Try:
>
>   def foo(a=5)
>   end
>
>   p foo()

Please forgive me. I may have missed some mail that went by in the 
past, but I still don't understand:

& ruby16 -ve 'def foo(a=5); end; p foo()'
ruby 1.6.8 (2002-12-24) [powerpc-darwin7.0]
nil

& ruby -ve 'def foo(a=5); end; p foo()'
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd4]
nil

& ruby -ve 'def foo(a=5); end; p foo()'
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-20) [powerpc-darwin7.7.0]
nil

To make sure, I checked the change logs between 11/15 and 11/29 (when 
the commit was made) to make sure I didn't skip over something 
relevant. I might have missed something though. Again, sorry for the 
trouble, I'm just trying to understand if I can tighten down our 
assertions on one of our projects.


In This Thread