[#3861] super — ts <decoux@...>
[#3862] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Hi,
[#3881] mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...>
Hello,
[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>
The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Jos Backus wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:47:48AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0900, James Britt wrote:
[#3914] Pathname needs a makeover — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#3922] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — noreply@...
Bugs item #1173, was opened at 2004-12-08 17:35
[#3966] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
I still get this happening a lot with my Rubyx linux ruby script.
This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times
Hi,
[#3975] Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I believe these are the minimal patches needed to make it possible to
[#3982] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
[#4000] 1.8.2 preview4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello,
[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com
First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to
GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Francis Hwang wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
First of all, the entire discussion of when GET is appropriate
mde@state26.com wrote:
[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
Hi,
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more
>
Brent Roman wrote:
> Brent Roman wrote:
Brent Roman wrote:
> Florian Gross wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4040] Extensions, Internal — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>
Hi,
Re: Patches to test/unit
On Dec 18, 2004, at 5:16 PM, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
> Already you can do:
>
> $ ruby -rtest/unit -rtest/unit/autorunner -e
> Test::Unit::AutoRunner.run
Given that the code in test/unit.rb is only used by autorunner.rb, I
think that it is still the correct thing to do to move it to
autorunner.rb. That way test/unit can be used in more ways w/o an
at_exit handler that is provided in test/unit.rb getting in the way.
> Or
>
> $ testrb .
I didn't know about testrb, but I can't seem to get it to work like you
demonstrated:
<510> testrb18 .
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/cache.rb:36:in
`from_installed_gems': /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/rational.rb:53:in
`reduce': stack level too deep (SystemStackError)
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/rational.rb:43:in `Rational'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/rational.rb:136:in `/'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/rational.rb:139:in `/'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/date.rb:424:in `jd_to_ajd'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/date.rb:703:in `today'
from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/specification.rb:264:in
`date='
from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/specification.rb:254:in
`date='
from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/specification.rb:342:in
`send'
... 813 levels...
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:68
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:63:in `[]'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:192:in
`run'
from /usr/local/bin/testrb18:5