[#3861] super — ts <decoux@...>
[#3862] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Hi,
[#3881] mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...>
Hello,
[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>
The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Jos Backus wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:47:48AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0900, James Britt wrote:
[#3914] Pathname needs a makeover — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#3922] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — noreply@...
Bugs item #1173, was opened at 2004-12-08 17:35
[#3966] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
I still get this happening a lot with my Rubyx linux ruby script.
This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times
Hi,
[#3975] Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I believe these are the minimal patches needed to make it possible to
[#3982] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
[#4000] 1.8.2 preview4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello,
[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com
First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to
GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Francis Hwang wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
First of all, the entire discussion of when GET is appropriate
mde@state26.com wrote:
[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
Hi,
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more
>
Brent Roman wrote:
> Brent Roman wrote:
Brent Roman wrote:
> Florian Gross wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4040] Extensions, Internal — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>
Hi,
Re: [BUG] unknown node type 0 - SERIOUS ENOUGH TO MIGRATE AWAY FROM RUBY?
This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times by myself and many other people, but never addressed. Unfortunately, the usual response is "Give a small code example reproducing the problem", which is impossible (given the nature of the bug), so it gets overlooked. Common themes seem to be 1) Its pretty random 2) Changing a source file, even by adding white space, often causes the problem to appear/dissappear 3) Test cases are worthless. It will undoutedly work on your machine. This is undoutedly some sort of nasty random read/write scribble bug. These are other reports (A quick search on google/groups find 330+) http://www.talkaboutprogramming.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/messages/116486.html http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/63237 http://www.generic-nic.net/dyn/mon/detail?tld=.pr_Puerto_Rico http://rubyforge.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=1126 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?q=ruby+%5BBUG%5D+unknown+node+type+0&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=200409161610.24892.andrew%40walrond.org&rnum=1 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?q=ruby+%5BBUG%5D+unknown+node+type+0&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=200301302033.59645.uehli%40bluewin.ch&rnum=2 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?q=ruby+%5BBUG%5D+unknown+node+type+0&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=200304091208.00832.fg%40siamecommerce.com&rnum=3 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?q=ruby+%5BBUG%5D+unknown+node+type+0&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=1081211008.555546.15826.nullmailer%40picachu.netlab.jp&rnum=4 ... The problem is serious. It bites me, and many others, frequently. I use ruby based init scripts for my Rubyx linux distro, which is about as mission critical as it gets. I have offered opportunities to debug a reproducible test case on one of my servers (see my previous post to ruby-core), but nobody seems interested. My time and resources are at your disposal; I am record as having already spent considerable time trying to solve this already. I love ruby and don't want to have to migrate away, but I _need_ reliability, and it's looking like my only option. Yours, having a bad day, Andrew Walrond [ Imagine; Rubyx becomes Pythix, or Perlix - Yuk! :) ] FWIW and for other sufferers, (my) empirical evidence suggests that building ruby with debug info (-g) makes the problem dissappear ... mostly ...