[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>

The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO

17 messages 2004/12/06
[#3909] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/07

Hi,

[#3910] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/07

On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#3925] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/12/09

Jos Backus wrote:

[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com

First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to

17 messages 2004/12/23
[#4016] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2004/12/24

GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read

[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

35 messages 2004/12/27
[#4070] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/02

Hi,

[#4072] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/02

[#4079] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4081] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/03

[#4082] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4084] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/04

I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more

[#4086] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/04

[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2004/12/27

[BUG] File#reopen bug in 1.8.2

From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2004-12-25 11:23:06 UTC
List: ruby-core #4021
Hi --

Sorry to be Scrooge... :-)

Out of the box I'm getting the following error:

laptop:~/ruby-1.8.2$ ri Array#join
/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_display.rb:213:in
`reopen': <STDOUT> cannot change access mode from "w" to "w+"
(ArgumentError)


I have tracked it down only superficially -- it comes from io.c,
specifically:

#if !defined __CYGWIN__
     if (IS_PREP_STDIO(fptr)) {
         if ((fptr->mode & FMODE_READWRITE) != (orig->mode & FMODE_READWRITE)) {
             rb_raise(rb_eArgError,
                      "%s cannot change access mode from \"%s\" to \"%s\"",
                      PREP_STDIO_NAME(fptr), rb_io_flags_mode(fptr->mode),
                      rb_io_flags_mode(orig->mode));
         }
     }
#endif

Is it possible this is supposed to be "#if defined" rather than "if
!defined"?   This is just a guess on my part, though if I take out the
"!" it seems to run fine on my machine (Gentoo Linux).


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net

In This Thread

Prev Next