[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>

The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO

17 messages 2004/12/06
[#3909] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/07

Hi,

[#3910] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/07

On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#3925] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/12/09

Jos Backus wrote:

[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com

First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to

17 messages 2004/12/23
[#4016] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2004/12/24

GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read

[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

35 messages 2004/12/27
[#4070] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/02

Hi,

[#4072] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/02

[#4079] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4081] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/03

[#4082] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4084] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/04

I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more

[#4086] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/04

[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2004/12/27

[ ruby-Bugs-1184 ] "Invalid Argument" for Windows Sockets

From: noreply@...
Date: 2004-12-09 18:35:30 UTC
List: ruby-core #3939
Bugs item #1184, was opened at 2004-12-09 13:34
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=1184&group_id=426

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Smith (tsmith)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: "Invalid Argument" for Windows Sockets

Initial Comment:
With ruby 1.8.2 (2004-11-06) [i386-mswin32], the following code produces "in `write': Invalid argument" on the second write to the socket.  Removing the sleep statement, removing the first write, or shortening the string in the first write to "first write" prevents the error.  Not sure what's going on, but this doesn't seem like expected behavior.

require "socket"

socket = TCPSocket.new "www.google.com", 80
socket.write "first write to the socket"
sleep 1
socket.write "second write to the socket"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=1184&group_id=426

In This Thread

Prev Next