[#3861] super — ts <decoux@...>
[#3862] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Hi,
[#3881] mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...>
Hello,
[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>
The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Jos Backus wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:47:48AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0900, James Britt wrote:
[#3914] Pathname needs a makeover — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#3922] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — noreply@...
Bugs item #1173, was opened at 2004-12-08 17:35
[#3966] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
I still get this happening a lot with my Rubyx linux ruby script.
This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times
Hi,
[#3975] Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I believe these are the minimal patches needed to make it possible to
[#3982] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
[#4000] 1.8.2 preview4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello,
[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com
First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to
GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Francis Hwang wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
First of all, the entire discussion of when GET is appropriate
mde@state26.com wrote:
[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
Hi,
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more
>
Brent Roman wrote:
> Brent Roman wrote:
Brent Roman wrote:
> Florian Gross wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4040] Extensions, Internal — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>
Hi,
Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello there. | I understand wanting to help out people migrating to Ruby, but they are | going to encounter a number of things that are just plain different (at | least I hope that's the case). | In general, I find arguments by language comparison unpersuasive; saying | that PHP allows for something is not terribly compelling. PHP allows | for all sorts of things I hope never to see in Ruby. Yeah, I think that *comparison* between languages sucks, because it leads you to nowhere but just a huge discussion. But using a language to *give an example* to a thing proposed to the other one (that could not be a such horrible thing just because it's on the first language and not on the second) can be very helpful. ;-) It's not the same as saying that Java have static typing and I want it on Ruby. ;-) | Allowing multiple param hashes is perhaps a reasonable option, provided | that the default hash adheres to whatever RFC (or equivalent) applies. Yeah, my point is, even if we can check where that parameters came from, it's easy and helpful to provide access to them on a easy way. If I'm presuming I'm dealing with a FORM, I can ask the POST parameters about the values. | For example, if I try to mix post and get (so to speak; browsers only do | one or the other), and make a post request, and inspect the default | params hash (as apposed to post_params or get_params), I would not | expect to see any so-called query string data in there. Exactly. | Those who like the option of mixing the two would still have the choice, | distasteful as that may be. And in the case of the cgi.rb, gives compatility to what is already written. Leave the "all parameters" there, but fills the other ones also. | Probably something that belongs in a 'php.rb' module. ) PHP.rb? Are you being sarcastic? ;-) Not such a change like that. Just put the POST and GET values on their places. :-) Best regards, - ---------------------------- Eust痃uio "TaQ" Rangel eustaquiorangel@yahoo.com http://beam.to/taq Usu疵io GNU/Linux no. 224050 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBzen/b6UiZnhJiLsRAk3mAKCkdg5RIuwVquXc26v9Atr/EQRUOwCgv20K +k/gE08IRvSN6baAMYK9Ix0= =L4ME -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----