[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>

The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO

17 messages 2004/12/06
[#3909] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/07

Hi,

[#3910] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/07

On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#3925] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/12/09

Jos Backus wrote:

[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com

First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to

17 messages 2004/12/23
[#4016] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2004/12/24

GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read

[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

35 messages 2004/12/27
[#4070] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/02

Hi,

[#4072] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/02

[#4079] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4081] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/03

[#4082] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4084] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/04

I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more

[#4086] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/04

[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2004/12/27

[ ruby-Bugs-1188 ] test stalling for test_readline (in TestReadline ) with cvs HEAD on mingw

From: noreply@...
Date: 2004-12-11 11:37:53 UTC
List: ruby-core #3948
Bugs item #1188, was opened at 11-12-2004 12:36
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=1188&group_id=426

Category: Standard Library
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: gabriele renzi (riffraff)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: test stalling for test_readline (in TestReadline ) with cvs HEAD on mingw

Initial Comment:
the test running is stuck and won't progress. 
It is still interrruptible via <ctrl>+C, giving:
test_readline(TestReadline): ./test/readline/test_readline.rb:19:in `readline':
Interrupt
        from ./test/readline/test_readline.rb:19:in `test_readline'
        from ./test/readline/test_readline.rb:19:in `replace_stdio'
        from ./test/readline/test_readline.rb:19:in `test_readline'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9/test/unit/testcase.rb:70:in `__send__'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9/test/unit/testcase.rb:70:in `run'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9/test/unit/testsuite.rb:34:in `run'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `each'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `run'
         ... 9 levels...
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9/test/unit/ui/testrunnerutilities.rb:29:in `run
'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9/test/unit/autorunner.rb:191:in `run'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9/test/unit/autorunner.rb:13:in `run'
        from test/runner.rb:9


gcc -v says:
Reading specs from C:/Programmi/msys/MinGW/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.2/specs
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --host=mingw32 --target=mingw32 --prefix=/mingw --enable-threads --disable-nls --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,ada,objc,java --disable-win32-registry --disable-shared --enable-sjlj-exceptions --enable-libgcj --disable-java-awt --without-x --enable-java-gc=boehm --disable-libgcj-debug --enable-interpreter --enable-hash-synchronization --enable-libstdcxx-debug
Thread model: win32
gcc version 3.4.2 (mingw-special)


ruby -v is:
C:\ruby-build\ruby>ruby19 -v
ruby 1.9.0 (2004-12-11) [i386-mingw32]


PS
maybe the group box could have a choice beetween 1.8, and 1.9 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=1188&group_id=426

In This Thread

Prev Next