[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>

The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO

17 messages 2004/12/06
[#3909] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — nobu.nokada@... 2004/12/07

Hi,

[#3910] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/12/07

On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#3925] Re: [patch] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/12/09

Jos Backus wrote:

[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com

First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to

17 messages 2004/12/23
[#4016] Re: [PATCH] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2004/12/24

GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read

[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

35 messages 2004/12/27
[#4070] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — nobu.nokada@... 2005/01/02

Hi,

[#4072] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/02

[#4079] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4081] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/03

[#4082] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/01/03

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4084] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2005/01/04

I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more

[#4086] Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/01/04

[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2004/12/27

Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1208 ] webrick test_client_server does not pass

From: Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Date: 2004-12-15 13:09:35 UTC
List: ruby-core #3969
noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
> Bugs item #1208, was opened at 15-12-2004 11:05
> You can respond by visiting: 
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=1208&group_id=426
> 
> Category: None
> Group: None
> Status: Open
> Resolution: None
> Priority: 5
> Submitted By: gabriele renzi (riffraff)
> Assigned to: Nobody (None)
> Summary: webrick test_client_server does not pass
> 
> Initial Comment:
>   1) Error:
> test_client_server(Test_Webrick):
> TypeError: wrong argument type nil (expected Fixnum)
>     ./xmlrpc/webrick_testing.rb:31:in `kill'
>     ./xmlrpc/webrick_testing.rb:31:in `stop_server'
>     ./xmlrpc/test_webrick_server.rb:54:in `test_client_server'
>     ./xmlrpc/test_webrick_server.rb:49:in `each'
>     ./xmlrpc/test_webrick_server.rb:49:in `test_client_server'

This is due to method fork. I expect that when a block is given to fork, 
it will only return once, but in reallity it seems that it returns 
twice, even if a block is given:

   ruby -e 'p fork do "" end'

outputs:

   4534 (the pid)
   nil

ah, I was hit by a precedence error, this should work:

   ruby -e 'p fork { "" }'

outputs:

   4534

This should not return anything else than a Fixnum.

Regards,

   Michael

In This Thread

Prev Next