[#3861] super — ts <decoux@...>
[#3862] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Hi,
[#3881] mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...>
Hello,
[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>
The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Jos Backus wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:47:48AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0900, James Britt wrote:
[#3914] Pathname needs a makeover — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#3922] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — noreply@...
Bugs item #1173, was opened at 2004-12-08 17:35
[#3966] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
I still get this happening a lot with my Rubyx linux ruby script.
This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times
Hi,
[#3975] Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I believe these are the minimal patches needed to make it possible to
[#3982] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
[#4000] 1.8.2 preview4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello,
[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com
First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to
GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Francis Hwang wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
First of all, the entire discussion of when GET is appropriate
mde@state26.com wrote:
[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
Hi,
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more
>
Brent Roman wrote:
> Brent Roman wrote:
Brent Roman wrote:
> Florian Gross wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4040] Extensions, Internal — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>
Hi,
Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1208 ] webrick test_client_server does not pass
noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
> Bugs item #1208, was opened at 15-12-2004 11:05
> You can respond by visiting:
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=1208&group_id=426
>
> Category: None
> Group: None
> Status: Open
> Resolution: None
> Priority: 5
> Submitted By: gabriele renzi (riffraff)
> Assigned to: Nobody (None)
> Summary: webrick test_client_server does not pass
>
> Initial Comment:
> 1) Error:
> test_client_server(Test_Webrick):
> TypeError: wrong argument type nil (expected Fixnum)
> ./xmlrpc/webrick_testing.rb:31:in `kill'
> ./xmlrpc/webrick_testing.rb:31:in `stop_server'
> ./xmlrpc/test_webrick_server.rb:54:in `test_client_server'
> ./xmlrpc/test_webrick_server.rb:49:in `each'
> ./xmlrpc/test_webrick_server.rb:49:in `test_client_server'
This is due to method fork. I expect that when a block is given to fork,
it will only return once, but in reallity it seems that it returns
twice, even if a block is given:
ruby -e 'p fork do "" end'
outputs:
4534 (the pid)
nil
ah, I was hit by a precedence error, this should work:
ruby -e 'p fork { "" }'
outputs:
4534
This should not return anything else than a Fixnum.
Regards,
Michael