[#3861] super — ts <decoux@...>
[#3862] Marshal.dump'ing OpenStruct objects — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Hi,
[#3881] mkdir, mkdir_p in FileUtils and mode — Florian Frank <flori@...>
Hello,
[#3907] Obtaining mode information on an IO object — Jos Backus <jos@...>
The attached patch implements IO#mode. This method returns the mode the IO
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:13AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Jos Backus wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:47:48AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0900, James Britt wrote:
[#3914] Pathname needs a makeover — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#3922] Incorrect escaping in strings produced by String::inspect — noreply@...
Bugs item #1173, was opened at 2004-12-08 17:35
[#3966] unknown node type 0 — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
I still get this happening a lot with my Rubyx linux ruby script.
This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times
Hi,
[#3975] Patches to test/unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I believe these are the minimal patches needed to make it possible to
[#3982] Win32: rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
[#4000] 1.8.2 preview4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello,
[#4009] cgi.rb -- more GET/POST stuff — mde@...26.com
First of all, I think it would be great, as Eustaquio suggests, to
GETs and POSTs are defined to be fairly different actions. I'd read
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Francis Hwang wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
First of all, the entire discussion of when GET is appropriate
mde@state26.com wrote:
[#4027] Allowing custom number literal suffixes? — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
Hi,
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I'm not sure I would advocate making Ruby's grammar even more
>
Brent Roman wrote:
> Brent Roman wrote:
Brent Roman wrote:
> Florian Gross wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#4033] Garbage collection trouble — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
>>>>> "C" == Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> writes:
[#4040] Extensions, Internal — Jgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>
Hi,
[bug] serious memory leak + continuations
Hi,
ruby 1.9.0 (2004-12-20) [i386-freebsd5.2.1]
gcc version 3.3.3 [FreeBSD] 20031106
In my application, if I change:
# (1) this works
callback_stream.with_callbacks_for(self, :action) { |callback, val|
catch(:something) { callback.call }
throw :wee_back_to_session
}
into:
# (2) this leaks
callback_stream.with_callbacks_for(self, :action) { |callback, val|
res = catch(:something) { callback.call }
throw :wee_back_to_session
}
or into:
# (3) this leaks
callback_stream.with_callbacks_for(self, :action) { |callback, val|
callback.call
throw :wee_back_to_session
}
memory consumption is unbounded! BTW, ":something" is never thrown. It
seems that if I reference the return value of callback.call, the memory
leak appears. The leak also happens if I change "res = " in (2) into
"@res = " or "$res = ". Note that inside callback.call continuations are
created.
And if I return "nil" from the block (callback.call), it leaks, too,
even if I use code sample (1).
I tried above example also with ruby-stable compiled with 2.95.4 (-O0
enabled), but there all three examples leak memory.
It seems to be related to the "unknown node type 0 bug", as it appears
to be pretty random (at least in my eyes):
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/123694
Help! I can send the whole sources to someone who is interested. Only
requirements are rubygems, installed narf gem (webunit) and gnuplot to
display memory consumption, and of course *nix.
Regards,
Michael