[#39810] 2.0 feature questionnaire — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

I made a questionnaire "What do you want to introduce in 2.0?" in my

59 messages 2011/10/01
[#39822] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire — Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...> 2011/10/02

2011/10/1 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>:

[#39827] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/02

Hi,

[#40324] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/10/25

2011/10/1 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>:

[#39823] Discussion results — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

34 messages 2011/10/02
[#39840] Re: Discussion results — Intransition <transfire@...> 2011/10/02

I did not have the fortune of attending the discussion, but I would

[#39844] Re: Discussion results — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/02

Hi,

[#39851] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents) — "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...> 2011/10/03

Hello Matz,

[#39862] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents) — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...> 2011/10/03

Hello,

[#39874] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents) — Trans <transfire@...> 2011/10/03

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:

[#39915] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5400][Open] Remove flip-flops in 2.0 — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>

29 messages 2011/10/04

[#39957] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5407][Open] Cannot build ruby-1.9.3-rc1 with TDM-GCC 4.6.1 on Windows XP SP3 — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

11 messages 2011/10/05

[#39993] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library — David Graham <david.malcom.graham@...>

10 messages 2011/10/06

[#40037] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5422][Open] File.fnmatch != Dir.glob # {no,sets} — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>

14 messages 2011/10/07

[#40073] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5427][Open] Not complex patch to improve `require` time (load.c) — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>

31 messages 2011/10/09

[#40090] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5433][Open] PTY.spawn Kernel panic on macos lion — Gamaliel Toro <argami@...>

14 messages 2011/10/10

[#40188] [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

16 messages 2011/10/17
[#40189] Re: [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2011/10/17

This looks very interesting=21 Would someone be willing to translate to e=

[#40191] Re: [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments — Yutaka Hara <yutaka.hara@...> 2011/10/18

Hi,

[#40192] Re: [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/18

Hi,

[#40259] Counseling — Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>

Ruby and I are back in counseling... Its always the same thing with =

21 messages 2011/10/21
[#40263] Re: Counseling — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2011/10/21

What's your $LC_CTYPE? What OS are you on?

[#40264] Re: Counseling — Gon軋lo Silva <goncalossilva@...> 2011/10/21

Hi all,

[#40266] Re: Counseling — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2011/10/21

Gon軋lo Silva wrote:

[#40271] Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"? — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>

Hello, rubygems developers --

17 messages 2011/10/22

[#40290] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>

36 messages 2011/10/23
[#40298] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/24

Hi,

[#40414] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/10/26

More refinement below. I think we're on a good path here.

[#40416] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/26

Hi,

[#40418] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/10/26

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>wrote:

[#40425] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/27

Hi,

[#40311] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5478][Open] import Set into core, add syntax — Konstantin Haase <Konstantin.Haase@...>

33 messages 2011/10/24

[#40312] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5479][Open] import StringIO into core, add String#to_io — Konstantin Haase <Konstantin.Haase@...>

9 messages 2011/10/24

[#40316] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481][Open] Gemifying Ruby standard library — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>

86 messages 2011/10/24
[#40334] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481] Gemifying Ruby standard library — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...> 2011/10/25

[#40322] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5482][Open] Rubinius as basis for Ruby 2.0 — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

19 messages 2011/10/25

[#40356] JIT development for MRI — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>

Hello,

25 messages 2011/10/25
[#40390] Re: JIT development for MRI — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/10/26

Hi,

[#40394] Re: JIT development for MRI — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...> 2011/10/26

Dear Koichi SASADA,

[#40395] Re: JIT development for MRI — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...> 2011/10/26

I noticed that you used context threading in YARV. Do you have some analysis

[#40417] Re: JIT development for MRI — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/10/26

Thanks for reference.

[#40423] Re: JIT development for MRI — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...> 2011/10/26

Thanks Koichi.

[#40412] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5486][Open] rb_stat() doesn’t respect input encoding — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

15 messages 2011/10/26

[#40462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5492][Open] MinGW Installation with Ruby 1.9.3rc1 Broken — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

14 messages 2011/10/27

[#40573] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5530][Open] SEEK_SET malfunctions when used with 'append' File.open mode — "Joshua J. Drake" <ruby-lang.jdrake@...>

17 messages 2011/10/31

[#40586] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5531][Open] deep_value for dealing with nested hashes — Kyle Peyton <kylepeyton@...>

19 messages 2011/10/31

[ruby-core:40235] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5432] ruby 1.9.2-p290 ext/openssl build failure on Solaris 10 with Sun Workshop 12.1 or 12.2

From: Tim Mooney <Tim.Mooney@...>
Date: 2011-10-19 17:01:02 UTC
List: ruby-core #40235
Issue #5432 has been updated by Tim Mooney.


Thanks for confirming that it works for you Naohisa.  With the clue you've provided and some additional work I have done in the interim, I now have two ways around this issue.

The build directory was clean, as it gets removed and recreated before every attempted software build.  I use rpm to build & package all local software on my Solaris systems, and the spec file handles making certain that the build steps and build environment are always the exactly same.

I did have ruby 1.8.5 installed on the system, though, so I uninstalled that package and then re-tried the build of ruby 1.9.2-p290, and it did indeed work.

That, however, implies that there's a problem in the ruby build process, as it shouldn't be the case that a ruby build will fail because a previous version of ruby is installed on the system.  When that happens, generally it indicates that one or more of the Makefiles is not correctly added the source & build directory *before* any system directories, when searching for header files or libraries.

In addition, before I saw your response, I found another solution to the problem.  The errors I was getting all seemed to be pointing to issues with the rb_str_set_len macro from ruby_missing.h.  On a hunch, I started searching other parts of the ruby sources for that text, and found that string.c has a definition for rb_str_set_len that differs from the macro in ruby_missing.h, and that the compiler has no complaints about.

Since string.c has a defintion for it and that's what actually gets compiled into the library that other parts of ruby link with, I just commented out the #define for rb_str_set_len in ruby_missing.h, and that also allowed ruby to build.

I think that it would be advisable to either completely remove the #define for rb_str_set_len in ruby_missing.h, or at least make it match the definition that's being used in string.c.

Although I now have workarounds, both of the issues brought up in this bug should probably be investigated and changes made.  I'm happy to help with that, if others agree that work should continue on it.

----------------------------------------
Bug #5432: ruby 1.9.2-p290 ext/openssl build failure on Solaris 10 with Sun Workshop 12.1 or 12.2
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5432

Author: Tim Mooney
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Martin Bosslet
Category: build
Target version: 
ruby -v: 1.9.2-p290


I've tried building ruby 1.9.2-p290 and ruby 1.8.7-p352 on x86_64-sun-solaris2.10 (Solaris 10 10/08, update 6) with the no-cost Sun/Oracle Workshop toolchain.  I've tried both the Workshop 12.1 and the latest, 12.2, with the same results.

The compiler objects to anywhere that ossl_str_adjust is called.  Example:

gmake[1]: Entering directory `/local/src/RPM/BUILD/ruby-1.9.2-p290/ext/openssl'
cc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-solaris2.10 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/openssl -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\"extconf.h\"  -I/local/include -I/local/gnu/include -I/local/openssl/include -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64  -KPIC -Xa -xc99=all -xO0 -g -xs -xstrconst -mt -xtarget=native -I/loca/include -I/local/gnu/include -I/local/openssl/include -I/local/openssl/include    -o ossl_asn1.o -c ossl_asn1.c
"ossl_asn1.c", line 579: warning: statement not reached
"ossl_asn1.c", line 708: improper member use: ptr
"ossl_asn1.c", line 708: improper member use: len
"ossl_asn1.c", line 991: improper member use: ptr
"ossl_asn1.c", line 991: improper member use: len
cc: acomp failed for ossl_asn1.c
gmake[1]: *** [ossl_asn1.o] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/local/src/RPM/BUILD/ruby-1.9.2-p290/ext/openssl'
gmake: *** [mkmain.sh] Error 1

The same issue happens in other files (e.g. ossl_ext509.c).  If I preprocess the file, the macro 

    ossl_str_adjust(der, p);

on line 708 of ossl_asn1.c (near the end of the function ossl_asn1data_to_der) turns into

     do { int len = ( ! ( ( ( struct RBasic * ) ( der ) ) -> flags & ( ( ( VALUE ) 1 ) << ( 12 + 1 ) ) ) ? ( long ) ( ( ( ( struct RBasic * ) ( der ) ) -> flags >> ( 12 + 2 ) ) & ( ( ( ( ( VALUE ) 1 ) << ( 12 + 2 ) ) | ( ( ( VALUE ) 1 ) << ( 12 + 3 ) ) | ( ( ( VALUE ) 1 ) << ( 12 + 4 ) ) | ( ( ( VALUE ) 1 ) << ( 12 + 5 ) ) | ( ( ( VALUE ) 1 ) << ( 12 + 6 ) ) ) >> ( 12 + 2 ) ) ) : ( ( struct RString * ) ( der ) ) -> as . heap . len ) ; int newlen = ( p ) - ( unsigned char * ) ( ! ( ( ( struct RBasic * ) ( der ) ) -> flags & ( ( ( VALUE ) 1 ) << ( 12 + 1 ) ) ) ? ( ( struct RString * ) ( der ) ) -> as . ary : ( ( struct RString * ) ( der ) ) -> as . heap . ptr ) ; ( void ) ( ( newlen <= len ) || ( __assert_c99 ( "newlen <= len" , "ossl_asn1.c" , 708 , __func__ ) , 0 ) ) ; do { ( ( struct RString * ) ( der ) ) -> ptr [ newlen ] = 0 ; ( ( struct RString * ) ( der ) ) -> len = newlen ; } while ( 0 ) ; } while ( 0 );

I understand that gcc is the typical compiler for most platforms, but the Oracle Workshop toolchain often produces more efficient code on Solaris, so it's what I typically use for building opensource software on Solaris.



-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next