[#39810] 2.0 feature questionnaire — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

I made a questionnaire "What do you want to introduce in 2.0?" in my

59 messages 2011/10/01
[#39822] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire — Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...> 2011/10/02

2011/10/1 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>:

[#39827] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/02

Hi,

[#40324] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/10/25

2011/10/1 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>:

[#39823] Discussion results — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

34 messages 2011/10/02
[#39840] Re: Discussion results — Intransition <transfire@...> 2011/10/02

I did not have the fortune of attending the discussion, but I would

[#39844] Re: Discussion results — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/02

Hi,

[#39851] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents) — "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...> 2011/10/03

Hello Matz,

[#39862] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents) — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...> 2011/10/03

Hello,

[#39874] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents) — Trans <transfire@...> 2011/10/03

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:

[#39915] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5400][Open] Remove flip-flops in 2.0 — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>

29 messages 2011/10/04

[#39957] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5407][Open] Cannot build ruby-1.9.3-rc1 with TDM-GCC 4.6.1 on Windows XP SP3 — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

11 messages 2011/10/05

[#39993] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library — David Graham <david.malcom.graham@...>

10 messages 2011/10/06

[#40037] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5422][Open] File.fnmatch != Dir.glob # {no,sets} — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>

14 messages 2011/10/07

[#40073] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5427][Open] Not complex patch to improve `require` time (load.c) — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>

31 messages 2011/10/09

[#40090] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5433][Open] PTY.spawn Kernel panic on macos lion — Gamaliel Toro <argami@...>

14 messages 2011/10/10

[#40188] [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

16 messages 2011/10/17
[#40189] Re: [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2011/10/17

This looks very interesting=21 Would someone be willing to translate to e=

[#40191] Re: [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments — Yutaka Hara <yutaka.hara@...> 2011/10/18

Hi,

[#40192] Re: [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/18

Hi,

[#40259] Counseling — Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>

Ruby and I are back in counseling... Its always the same thing with =

21 messages 2011/10/21
[#40263] Re: Counseling — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2011/10/21

What's your $LC_CTYPE? What OS are you on?

[#40264] Re: Counseling — Gon軋lo Silva <goncalossilva@...> 2011/10/21

Hi all,

[#40266] Re: Counseling — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2011/10/21

Gon軋lo Silva wrote:

[#40271] Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"? — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>

Hello, rubygems developers --

17 messages 2011/10/22

[#40290] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>

36 messages 2011/10/23
[#40298] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/24

Hi,

[#40414] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/10/26

More refinement below. I think we're on a good path here.

[#40416] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/26

Hi,

[#40418] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/10/26

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>wrote:

[#40425] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/10/27

Hi,

[#40311] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5478][Open] import Set into core, add syntax — Konstantin Haase <Konstantin.Haase@...>

33 messages 2011/10/24

[#40312] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5479][Open] import StringIO into core, add String#to_io — Konstantin Haase <Konstantin.Haase@...>

9 messages 2011/10/24

[#40316] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481][Open] Gemifying Ruby standard library — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>

86 messages 2011/10/24
[#40334] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481] Gemifying Ruby standard library — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...> 2011/10/25

[#40322] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5482][Open] Rubinius as basis for Ruby 2.0 — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

19 messages 2011/10/25

[#40356] JIT development for MRI — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>

Hello,

25 messages 2011/10/25
[#40390] Re: JIT development for MRI — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/10/26

Hi,

[#40394] Re: JIT development for MRI — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...> 2011/10/26

Dear Koichi SASADA,

[#40395] Re: JIT development for MRI — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...> 2011/10/26

I noticed that you used context threading in YARV. Do you have some analysis

[#40417] Re: JIT development for MRI — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/10/26

Thanks for reference.

[#40423] Re: JIT development for MRI — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...> 2011/10/26

Thanks Koichi.

[#40412] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5486][Open] rb_stat() doesn’t respect input encoding — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

15 messages 2011/10/26

[#40462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5492][Open] MinGW Installation with Ruby 1.9.3rc1 Broken — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

14 messages 2011/10/27

[#40573] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5530][Open] SEEK_SET malfunctions when used with 'append' File.open mode — "Joshua J. Drake" <ruby-lang.jdrake@...>

17 messages 2011/10/31

[#40586] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5531][Open] deep_value for dealing with nested hashes — Kyle Peyton <kylepeyton@...>

19 messages 2011/10/31

[ruby-core:39844] Re: Discussion results

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2011-10-02 21:38:13 UTC
List: ruby-core #39844
Hi,

In message "Re: [ruby-core:39840] Re: Discussion results"
    on Mon, 3 Oct 2011 03:36:02 +0900, Intransition <transfire@gmail.com> writes:

|I did not have the fortune of attending the discussion, but I would
|like to put forth some notions I've had/seen for Ruby 2.0:
|
|1) Go through ActiveSupport core extensions and Ruby Facets to find
|most popular and useful methods and port them over. Good examples are
|String #indent, #tab, #tabto, #to_h/#to_hash methods, Hash#rekey,
|#blank, those have been useful to me. I'm sure others have their own
|favorites too --take a poll or do some code analysis to figure out
|which ones.

Activesupport is just fine by itself.  I am not that positive to merge
anything from Activesupport, unless there is some very specific reason
to merge to the core.  I have merged Symbol#to_proc from Activesupport
in the past, but slight behavioral difference caused problems.

|2) Make toplevel a self extended module instead of a weak proxy of
|Object. Besides being conceptually easier to understand, it would
|allow DSL scripts to run at toplevel without worry of infecting
|Object. This would have been a huge boon for me in couple of my
|projects, such as my test framework --instead I had to write my own
|toplevel-like proxy to fake it, which is inevitably imperfect and just
|pain to have to do.

I don't understand what would satisfy you.  Could elaborate rather
than forcing me to guess your intention?

|3)  Add margin literal, e.g.
|
|    > %L|This is
|        |  margin
|        |    controlled.
|    => "This is\n  margin\n    controlled."
|
|Nothing sucks more for readability than having to flush a literal
|string to the left margin in the middle of indented code.

Use here documents.  At least above syntax requires huge overhaul of
the lexer/parser, that I don't think worth it.

|4) Treat `@` as a hash object, so @['foo'] is the same as @foo. This
|would make it much easier to work with instance variables, e.g.
|@.each{ |k,v| ... }

I am not positive about this proposal.  It is not intuitive.

|5) Better support for lazy and differed processing, e.g. lazy.rb and
|denumerable.rb.

I agree.  I like lazy. That would be a good candidate to be merged in.
I know little about denumerable.  I will investigate later.

|6) Add High-order Function to language but more tightly integrated to
|remove inefficiencies of pure-Ruby implementation. This is great
|device for making robust fluent notations.

Be more specific.  What would code look like by using it?

|7) Lastly, I think serious consideration should be given to removing
|the distinction between class and module. The distinction is purely a
|conceptual one that has built artificial limitations and undo
|complications into the language. What difference does it make to Bar
|if we include Bar, subclass Bar or instantiate Bar? Bar shouldn't have
|to care --it's just an encapsulation.

I am sorry but I'd have to say no.  Distinction between class and
module is very important for the fundamental OO design policy of Ruby
language.  I really like the simplicity of Ruby's mix-in system.
Removing the distinction would mean going back to multiple
inheritance, which I hate.

Of course I know multiple inheritance works just fine for many cases,
but this is my language, so it will follow my preference.


In message "Re: [ruby-core:39842] Re: Discussion results"
    on Mon, 3 Oct 2011 03:44:14 +0900, Intransition <transfire@gmail.com> writes:
|
|Oh, how could I forget:
|
|8) Open up access to the internal methods for looking up scripts used
|to find files in the $LOAD_PATH. Use of this is plugin file loaders.

It is under discussion.  Even though I am not positive about
disclosing internals of #require, it might be useful for some cases.

|9) autoload needs use an overridable require method of some sort. I
|use a custom load manager for developement, but since I can't get hold
|of autoload's require I can't use autoload in my projects, which
|majorly sucks!!!

I hate autoload.  autoload is one of things I regret.  I'm not
positive about enhancing something that I hate.

							matz.

In This Thread