[#47409] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6973][Open] Add an #integral? method to Numeric to test for whole-number values — "regularfry (Alex Young)" <alex@...>

12 messages 2012/09/03

[#47481] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7008][Open] rake is crashing when trying to compile ffi gem — "drookie (Eugene M. Zheganin Eugene M. Zheganin)" <eugene@...>

10 messages 2012/09/12

[#47505] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7019][Open] allow `private` and `protected` keywords to take blocks — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>

15 messages 2012/09/13

[#47582] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7037][Open] float formatting inconsistently rounds half to even — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

14 messages 2012/09/19

[#47638] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7046][Open] ERB#run and ERB#result are not safe for concurrent use — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

11 messages 2012/09/21

[#47655] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7051][Open] Extend caller_locations API to include klass and bindings. Allow caller_locations as a method hanging off Thread. — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>

13 messages 2012/09/23

[#47657] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7055][Open] Allow `.foo=` as a synonym of `self.foo=` — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>

11 messages 2012/09/23

[#47730] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7085][Open] Subversion → GitHub gateway stops. — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>

27 messages 2012/09/29

[#47735] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7087][Open] ::ConditionVariable#wait does not work with Monitor because Monitor#sleep does not exist — "rklemme (Robert Klemme)" <shortcutter@...>

10 messages 2012/09/29

[#47759] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7092][Open] StringScanner start-of-line matches false positives, while lookbehind for a newline gives false negatives — "jayferd (Jay Adkisson)" <jjmadkisson@...>

8 messages 2012/09/30

[ruby-core:47631] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481] Gemifying Ruby standard library

From: "nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura)" <nakahiro@...>
Date: 2012-09-21 14:35:04 UTC
List: ruby-core #47631
Issue #5481 has been updated by nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura).


Kou, thanks for the cooperation. We would need your help soon.

kou (Kouhei Sutou) wrote:
> NaHi, could you tell us status of this work?

I did the presentation at the last dev meeting and I think I/we need to clarify a part of the proposal for blessing from Matz.  I guess Endoh-san didn't update this ticket yet?  (No intention to blame.  My bad, I should have asked this earlier.)
----------------------------------------
Feature #5481: Gemifying Ruby standard library
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5481#change-29638

Author: nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura)
Category: lib
Target version: 3.0


=begin

Up-to-date summary of this proposal is at ((<URL:https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/StdlibGem>))

== Motivation

 * ruby's release cycle is slow for some standard libraries;
   * ex. security fix for WEBrick, xmlrpc and Zlib.
   * ex. API iteration for net/http, OpenSSL, json, psych, RDoc, minitest and rake.
 * There's already the feature called 'default gems' in ruby and some stdlibs are already using it:
   * rake, rdoc, minitest, json, io-console, bigdecimal
   * And some gems are already doing out-of-band releases.
 * When releasing we should give independence equally to all stdlibs, but in a consistent and controllable way.

== Proposal

 * Allow out-of-band stdlib releases.
   * We are not proposing changes to ruby's release management, the release manager would decide when they release ruby and stdlib.
 * Allow more stdlibs to be installed as a 'default gem'
 * Register these gems on RubyGems.org
   * Introduce a new mechanism: controlling supported ruby version so that we can avoid installing unexpected version of stdlib gems.
     For example, a WEBrick gem for ruby 2.0.1 (released from ruby_2_0_1 branch) should not be installed for ruby 2.0.0 (released from ruby_2_0_0 branch) unless we know it works for both 2.0.0 and 2.0.1.

Note:

 * Moving stdlibs repository location is not a target of this proposal. The implementation details of stdlib gems should hide this from ruby committers.
 * ruby_1_9_3 is not a target of this proposal. The change should be introduced from 2.0.0 release.


...Some more details of the proposal and discussion topics are going to follow as comments.
=end



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread