From: "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" Date: 2012-11-29T07:23:08+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:50272] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481] Gemifying Ruby standard library Issue #5481 has been updated by vo.x (Vit Ondruch). @trans You know how it is with exceptions. They tend to become rules and justification for another exceptions. I believe that my proposal is the best solution, because it will be almost like shipping already preinstalled gems, which you would need to rebuild anyway. Packaged gems do not give you any additional benefit. Anyway, I am not decision maker unfortunately. I just trying rectify current situation and prevent worser solutions by being proactive :) ---------------------------------------- Feature #5481: Gemifying Ruby standard library https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5481#change-34099 Author: nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura) Category: lib Target version: next minor =begin Up-to-date summary of this proposal is at (()) == Motivation * ruby's release cycle is slow for some standard libraries; * ex. security fix for WEBrick, xmlrpc and Zlib. * ex. API iteration for net/http, OpenSSL, json, psych, RDoc, minitest and rake. * There's already the feature called 'default gems' in ruby and some stdlibs are already using it: * rake, rdoc, minitest, json, io-console, bigdecimal * And some gems are already doing out-of-band releases. * When releasing we should give independence equally to all stdlibs, but in a consistent and controllable way. == Proposal * Allow out-of-band stdlib releases. * We are not proposing changes to ruby's release management, the release manager would decide when they release ruby and stdlib. * Allow more stdlibs to be installed as a 'default gem' * Register these gems on RubyGems.org * Introduce a new mechanism: controlling supported ruby version so that we can avoid installing unexpected version of stdlib gems. For example, a WEBrick gem for ruby 2.0.1 (released from ruby_2_0_1 branch) should not be installed for ruby 2.0.0 (released from ruby_2_0_0 branch) unless we know it works for both 2.0.0 and 2.0.1. Note: * Moving stdlibs repository location is not a target of this proposal. The implementation details of stdlib gems should hide this from ruby committers. * ruby_1_9_3 is not a target of this proposal. The change should be introduced from 2.0.0 release. ...Some more details of the proposal and discussion topics are going to follow as comments. =end -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/