From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
Date: 2011-11-01T05:56:11+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:40578] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.3-p0 is out

>>>> I heard that -fno-omit-frame-pointier solves the problem.
>>>
>>> That is correct, but the patch was not included in the release.
>>
>> Why you can't change OPTFLAGS by yourself?
>
> Not that I can't change it, is there is no mention about it.
>
> Also, building with Visual Studio, as commented by Usaku Nakamura,
> uses a similar option *by default*.
>
>> My concern is: Ruby don't need to introduce a workaround for gcc
>> X.Y.1.
>
> A workaround for Visual Studio (mswin) is already in place, why not for MinGW?

Visual Studio optimization issue is version independent. AFAIK.
Do MinGW issue really independ on gcc version? Are you sure?

If so, I have no reason to argue this. please go ahead.


My point is, gcc periodically released buggy version and we can't rescue
all of them. Not beyond it.


>> I think we need to wait one more year. If it is gcc 4.6.x generic
>> issue, we have to care it.
>> IOW, we can't rescue all of buggy gcc version. They are too much
>> unfortunately. (;_;
>>
>
> We have too many workarounds in place...

Yup.