From: Clifford Heath Date: 2011-10-07T15:20:34+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:40020] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library On 07/10/2011, at 1:16 PM, Kenta Murata wrote: > (2011.10.07 01:50 ), David Graham wrote: >> Is there a chance RBTree can be added to the standard library for Ruby 2.0? > I agree with you if the library name is changed. > The name of RBTree is too specific to its internal algorithm. > If we adopt RBTree, we must change the name of the library after > more better algorithms would be discovered. I agree. Hash is not named after the hashing algorithm that's being used, and Array is not named after its structure either. For sorted structures, I've previously used the name Sequence. I think this name would be suitable. I also wish that Ruby had this container type available as a standard. Clifford Heath.