ruby-core

> Should ruby not check for FDSETSIZE and refuse to use files whose fds are beyond this? (This limitation could be removed later if ruby ever moved to poll/epoll/kpoll)

[#29313] [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Bug #3112: require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default

28 messages 2010/04/08

[#29317] [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #3112 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#29377] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/04/09

2010/4/8 Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#29315] [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #3112 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#29336] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/04/08

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:06:55PM +0900, Yui NARUSE wrote:

[#29353] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/08

On 4/8/10, Aaron Patterson <aaron@tenderlovemaking.com> wrote:

[#29357] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/04/08

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 03:24:49AM +0900, Caleb Clausen wrote:

[#29359] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/08

On 4/8/10, Aaron Patterson <aaron@tenderlovemaking.com> wrote:

[#29376] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/04/09

First of all, people want compatibility.

[#29411] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/04/10

I found Aaron added YAML.quick_emit to Psych, thank.

[#29422] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/04/10

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 07:11:28PM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#29425] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/04/11

(2010/04/11 8:48), Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#29428] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/04/11

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 09:20:15AM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#29429] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/04/11

On Apr 10, 2010, at 17:58, Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#29440] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/04/11

(2010/04/11 10:23), Eric Hodel wrote:

[#29442] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/04/11

(2010/04/11 8:48), Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#29457] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/04/11

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 02:04:06PM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#29504] [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #3112 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#30044] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/05/06

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:14:59AM +0900, Usaku NAKAMURA wrote:

[#30049] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/06

Hello,

[#30059] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/05/06

On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:00:24PM +0900, U.Nakamura wrote:

[#30297] [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2010/05/18

Issue #3112 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#30304] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2010/05/18

Yugui,

[#30305] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/05/18

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:30:14PM +0900, Yuki Sonoda wrote:

[#30386] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2010/05/23

Bump.

[#31891] [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Anshul Khandelwal <redmine@...> 2010/08/27

Issue #3112 has been updated by Anshul Khandelwal.

[#31917] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/08/28

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:09:27PM +0900, Anshul Khandelwal wrote:

[#31923] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/08/29

(10/08/29 7:24), Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#29325] [Bug #1391](Closed) yaml cannot parse dates which are very far in future — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Issue #1391 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

1 message 2010/04/08

[#29326] [Bug #1398](Rejected) Segmentation fault is raised when the sdtin is redirected to Readline#readline — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Issue #1398 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

1 message 2010/04/08

[#29348] redmine is painfully slow — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...>

Redmine is extremely slow for me this morning, and was so yesterday as

2 messages 2010/04/08

[#29358] Re: redmine is painfully slow — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/04/08

> Redmine is extremely slow for me this morning, and was so yesterday as

[#29380] [Bug #3114] hi i am new guy on rails 3 please help me what is the solution for it — ketan muneshwar <redmine@...>

Bug #3114: hi i am new guy on rails 3 please help me what is the solution for it

1 message 2010/04/09

[#29381] [Bug #3115] got solution actually its myfault — ketan muneshwar <redmine@...>

Bug #3115: got solution actually its myfault

1 message 2010/04/09

[#29383] [Bug #3116] block call with `do' keyword in `until' condition causes parse error — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Bug #3116: block call with `do' keyword in `until' condition causes parse error

1 message 2010/04/09

[#29384] [Bug #3117] deeply nested parentheses in loop condition causes parse error — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Bug #3117: deeply nested parentheses in loop condition causes parse error

1 message 2010/04/09

[#29393] [Backport #3118] backport r25230 and r25995 to fix segfault — Matthew Kent <redmine@...>

Backport #3118: backport r25230 and r25995 to fix segfault

2 messages 2010/04/09

[#29394] Re: [Backport #3118] backport r25230 and r25995 to fix segfault — Kirk Haines <wyhaines@...> 2010/04/09

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Kent <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#29395] [Bug #3119] [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage — Simon Nicholls <redmine@...>

Bug #3119: [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage

9 messages 2010/04/09

[#30780] [Bug #3119][Closed] [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/06/16

Issue #3119 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30507] [Bug #3119][Feedback] [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #3119 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30515] [Bug #3119] [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage — Simon Nicholls <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #3119 has been updated by Simon Nicholls.

[#30525] [Bug #3119] [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage — Simon Nicholls <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #3119 has been updated by Simon Nicholls.

[#30526] [Bug #3119][Open] [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #3119 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30527] [Bug #3119] [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage — Simon Nicholls <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #3119 has been updated by Simon Nicholls.

[#30779] [Bug #3119] [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage — Simon Nicholls <redmine@...> 2010/06/16

Issue #3119 has been updated by Simon Nicholls.

[#30783] [Bug #3119] [Patch] "IOError (closed stream)" error with tempfile unlink then close usage — Simon Nicholls <redmine@...> 2010/06/16

Issue #3119 has been updated by Simon Nicholls.

[#29396] Invalid names — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...>

I wonder what your opinions are on using invalid method names in define_method.

3 messages 2010/04/09

[#29488] Re: Invalid names — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...> 2010/04/13

Any thoughts?

[#29493] Re: Invalid names — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/04/13

Hi,

[#29398] [Bug #3120] $: is setup wrong on windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #3120: $: is setup wrong on windows

4 messages 2010/04/09

[#29518] [Bug #3120] $: is setup wrong on windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #3120 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#29430] [Bug #3120] $: is setup wrong on windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/11

Issue #3120 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#29431] [Bug #3120](Closed) $: is setup wrong on windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/11

Issue #3120 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29415] [Bug #3121] "make rdoc" fails — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Bug #3121: "make rdoc" fails

5 messages 2010/04/10

[#29419] [Bug #3121] "make rdoc" fails — 404 why <redmine@...> 2010/04/10

Issue #3121 has been updated by 404 why.

[#29424] [Bug #3121] "make rdoc" fails — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/11

Issue #3121 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#29423] [Bug #3121] "make rdoc" fails — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/11

Issue #3121 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#29445] [Bug #3121](Closed) "make rdoc" fails — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2010/04/11

Issue #3121 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#29426] rdoc --no-force-update problem on ext4 filesystem — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

rdoc --no-force-update doesn't work on a filesystem which have subsecond

1 message 2010/04/11

[#29427] [Bug #3124] SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all) — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3124: SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all)

10 messages 2010/04/11

[#30794] [Bug #3124] SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all) — Wataru Kimura <redmine@...> 2010/06/17

Issue #3124 has been updated by Wataru Kimura.

[#30796] Re: [Bug #3124] SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/06/17

2010/6/18 Wataru Kimura <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#30871] [Bug #3124][Closed] SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all) — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2010/06/23

Issue #3124 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#29525] [Bug #3124] SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all) — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/15

Issue #3124 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#30503] [Bug #3124] SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all) — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #3124 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30770] [Bug #3124] SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all) — Wataru Kimura <redmine@...> 2010/06/15

Issue #3124 has been updated by Wataru Kimura.

[#30808] [Bug #3124] SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all) — Wataru Kimura <redmine@...> 2010/06/18

Issue #3124 has been updated by Wataru Kimura.

[#30823] Re: [Bug #3124] SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/06/19

2010/6/18 Wataru Kimura <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#30842] [Bug #3124] SocketError on SnowLeopard (during make test-all) — Wataru Kimura <redmine@...> 2010/06/21

Issue #3124 has been updated by Wataru Kimura.

[#29447] [RubySpec #3128] Randomness specs — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

RubySpec #3128: Randomness specs

7 messages 2010/04/11

[#29449] Re: [RubySpec #3128] Randomness specs — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/04/11

Hi,

[#29452] Re: [RubySpec #3128] Randomness specs — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/11

On 4/10/10, Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#29461] Re: [RubySpec #3128] Randomness specs — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/04/11

Hi,

[#29465] Re: [RubySpec #3128] Randomness specs — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/12

On 4/11/10, Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca> wrote:

[#29490] Re: [RubySpec #3128] Randomness specs — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/04/13

Hi,

[#29492] Re: [RubySpec #3128] Randomness specs — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/04/13

Hi,

[#29448] [ANN] Mail 2.2.0 — Mikel Lindsaar <raasdnil@...>

Mail version 2.2.0 has been pushed to RubyGems.org.

2 messages 2010/04/11

[#29473] Re: [ANN] Mail 2.2.0 — Michael Fellinger <m.fellinger@...> 2010/04/12

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Mikel Lindsaar <raasdnil@gmail.com> wrote:

[#29462] [Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #3131: add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array()

10 messages 2010/04/11

[#29484] [Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...> 2010/04/13

Issue #3131 has been updated by Suraj Kurapati.

[#29644] [Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...> 2010/04/20

Issue #3131 has been updated by Suraj Kurapati.

[#29692] Re: [Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/21

Hi,

[#29463] [Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...> 2010/04/11

Issue #3131 has been updated by Suraj Kurapati.

[#29480] Re: [Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/12

Hi,

[#29485] [Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...> 2010/04/13

Issue #3131 has been updated by Suraj Kurapati.

[#29744] [Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...> 2010/04/23

Issue #3131 has been updated by Suraj Kurapati.

[#30413] [Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...> 2010/05/25

Issue #3131 has been updated by Suraj Kurapati.

[#32017] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2010/09/02

Issue #3131 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#29464] [Bug #3132] …/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error — Ashley Williams <redmine@...>

Bug #3132: …/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error

8 messages 2010/04/12

[#29466] [Bug #3132](Assigned) …/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/12

Issue #3132 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#29467] Re: [Bug #3132](Assigned) …/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/04/12

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:23:12AM +0900, Yui NARUSE wrote:

[#29468] Re: [Bug #3132](Assigned) …/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/04/12

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:23:12AM +0900, Yui NARUSE wrote:

[#29471] [Bug #3132] …/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error — Ashley Williams <redmine@...> 2010/04/12

Issue #3132 has been updated by Ashley Williams.

[#29478] [Bug #3132](Open) …/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/04/12

Issue #3132 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#29487] [Bug #3132] …/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/13

Issue #3132 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#29603] [Bug #3132](Closed) …/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Bus Error — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/18

Issue #3132 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#29470] [Bug #3133] p251 failed to get rdoc — Jones Lee <redmine@...>

Bug #3133: p251 failed to get rdoc

1 message 2010/04/12

[#29472] [Bug #3135] Wording of LEGAL in respect of parse.c is unclear and incomplete — Paul Betteridge <redmine@...>

Bug #3135: Wording of LEGAL in respect of parse.c is unclear and incomplete

4 messages 2010/04/12

[#29474] [Bug #3135](Closed) Wording of LEGAL in respect of parse.c is unclear and incomplete — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/12

Issue #3135 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29479] [Bug #3135] Wording of LEGAL in respect of parse.c is unclear and incomplete — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/04/12

Issue #3135 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#29505] [Backport #3135] Wording of LEGAL in respect of parse.c is unclear and incomplete — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #3135 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29477] [Bug #3138] Segmentation fault — Benedikt Eickhoff <redmine@...>

Bug #3138: Segmentation fault

3 messages 2010/04/12

[#29481] Re: [Bug #3138] Segmentation fault — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/12

Hi,

[#29491] [Bug #3138] Segmentation fault — Benedikt Eickhoff <redmine@...> 2010/04/13

Issue #3138 has been updated by Benedikt Eickhoff.

[#29483] [Bug #3139] Possible Bug with Irb jobs from Ruby 1.9.2-dev — Rodrigo Alves Vieira <redmine@...>

Bug #3139: Possible Bug with Irb jobs from Ruby 1.9.2-dev

1 message 2010/04/12

[#29486] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3140: gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9

102 messages 2010/04/13

[#30651] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2010/06/08

Issue #3140 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#31002] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/07/02

Issue #3140 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#31003] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/02

Hi,

[#31005] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2010/07/02

We are about to ship a version of Ruby with a built in package manager with

[#31007] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/02

> We are about to ship a version of Ruby with a built in package manager with

[#31008] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Gon軋lo Silva <goncalossilva@...> 2010/07/02

Action Dispatch is the component responsible for handling requests and

[#31009] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/07/02

On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:

[#31010] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/07/02

On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 07:48:04AM +0900, Luis Lavena wrote:

[#31070] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/06

> I have to agree. 'm still trying to figure out the utility of

[#31073] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/06

[#31074] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/06

[#31083] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/07/06

On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 04:22:22PM +0900, Roger Pack wrote:

[#29489] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/04/13

After a brief discussion with Eric Hodel about this, there are a few questions before we can figure out how to solve this:

[#29513] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/04/14

Is there any comment on this? This is a big bug in 1.9.2 that we'd like to get fixed as soon as we can, but I need some input on it.

[#29526] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Rich Kilmer <rich.kilmer@...> 2010/04/15

I wrote this original code in gem_prelude.

[#29537] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/04/15

[#29539] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Rich Kilmer <rich.kilmer@...> 2010/04/15

Well that's basically option A. That custom require will be in the

[#29669] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/04/20

Any comment on this change? This will mean that there is a custom require defined in prelude and thus always used.

[#29787] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/04/25

Hi,

[#29789] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/04/26

See comment on patch below. Other than my comments, I'm fine with this.

[#30036] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/05/05

Since no one has responded, nobu, can you go ahead and commit it?

[#30138] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/05/10

Can we please get this committed for 1.9.2?

[#30140] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/05/10

On May 10, 2010, at 12:01, Evan Phoenix wrote:

[#29529] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/04/15

[#29536] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/04/15

[#30466] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/27

Issue #3140 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30572] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/06/03

Issue #3140 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#30576] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/06/03

What kind of tests are you looking for? The issue shows the bug and is the primary test. I haven't seen any other tests for the prelude at present.

[#30643] [Bug #3140][Closed] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/06/07

Issue #3140 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#30997] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yehuda Katz <redmine@...> 2010/07/02

Issue #3140 has been updated by Yehuda Katz.

[#31281] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/14

> This bug is absolutely critical, and pushing it back from 1.9.2 to 1.9.x will make 1.9.2 unusable. It is trivial for this bug to impact Rails as well. In my opinion, while this bug exists Ruby 1.9.2 is broken and I cannot recommend its use.

[#30998] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/07/02

Issue #3140 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#30999] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/07/02

Issue #3140 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#31006] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yehuda Katz <redmine@...> 2010/07/02

Issue #3140 has been updated by Yehuda Katz.

[#31012] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <redmine@...> 2010/07/02

Issue #3140 has been updated by Evan Phoenix.

[#31031] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/03

Hi,

[#31029] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/07/03

Issue #3140 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#31049] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2010/07/05

Issue #3140 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#31050] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/07/05

Issue #3140 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#31066] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yehuda Katz <redmine@...> 2010/07/06

Issue #3140 has been updated by Yehuda Katz.

[#31069] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/06

> @runpaint I don't think it does, since comment 17 does a simple require without requiring rubygems or using the #gem command.

[#31075] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2010/07/06

Issue #3140 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#31076] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/06

[#31077] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2010/07/06

Issue #3140 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#31078] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/06

[#31084] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/07/06

Issue #3140 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#31087] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/06

[#31089] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/07/06

[#31092] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/06

[#31088] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/07/06

On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:49:35AM +0900, Yusuke Endoh wrote:

[#31090] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/06

[#31086] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/06

> I set a deadline of this discussion: 7/10 (Sat) 23:59 JST.

[#31094] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/07/06

[#31095] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/06

Hi,

[#31098] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/07/06

On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:25, Evan Phoenix wrote:

[#31096] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <redmine@...> 2010/07/06

Issue #3140 has been updated by Evan Phoenix.

[#31104] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/07/07

Issue #3140 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#31108] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/07

> I've commited the patch to trunk.

[#31110] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/07/07

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:

[#31111] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/07

> What version of RubyGems?

[#31193] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/11

Hi,

[#31223] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/12

> Roger, could you re-try to build from scratch? ould you apply

[#31225] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/07/12

[#31230] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Gon軋lo Silva <goncalossilva@...> 2010/07/12

The sweep bug is related to something being sweeped and not having a type.

[#31257] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/13

> I'll try with 1_9_2 next.

[#31259] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/13

[#31260] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/13

2010/7/14 Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com>:

[#31261] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/07/13

[#31263] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/13

2010/7/14 Evan Phoenix <evan@fallingsnow.net>:

[#31314] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/16

> Wonderful! Thank you Yusuke! I'll keep a close eye on things to watch for anyone reporting bugs.

[#31315] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/07/16

[#31316] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/16

>> Evan, could you also merge in Nobu's patch to load full rubygems when

[#31195] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/07/11

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:

[#31197] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/11

Hi,

[#31198] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/11

Uh-oh, rc2 has been released.

[#31200] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/07/11

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:

[#31201] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/11

Hi,

[#31206] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/07/12

[#31207] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/07/12

Hi,

[#31214] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Gon軋lo Silva <goncalossilva@...> 2010/07/12

Yes. Almost everything gem-related might break when the wrong versions are

[#31196] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/07/11

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:

[#31199] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/07/11

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#31863] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/08/26

> C:\dev\ruby\downloads>gem search rdoc

[#31105] [Bug #3140][Closed] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/07/07

Issue #3140 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#31215] [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yehuda Katz <redmine@...> 2010/07/12

Issue #3140 has been updated by Yehuda Katz.

[#31216] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...> 2010/07/12

On Jul 12, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:

[#31218] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/07/12

Hi,

[#31236] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/13

Hi,

[#31241] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/07/13

[#31254] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/07/13

On Jul 13, 2010, at 1:03 AM, Evan Phoenix wrote:

[#31246] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/07/13

Hi,

[#31258] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/13

Hi,

[#31266] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/07/13

Hi,

[#31267] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/07/13

[#31231] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/12

[#31232] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/13

> If you 'gem install mongrel' on 1.9, it will fail (for a valid reason). The directory is not removed because that would prevent users from debugging the build process by reading 'gem_make.out' that is left there for this purpose.

[#31233] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/13

[#31237] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/13

Hi,

[#31242] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/07/13

[#31235] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/07/13

2010/7/13 Yehuda Katz <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#31240] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/07/13

[#29494] [Bug #3143] [Ruby 1.8.7] Segmentation fault / stack level too deep — Daniel Ribeiro <redmine@...>

Bug #3143: [Ruby 1.8.7] Segmentation fault / stack level too deep

2 messages 2010/04/13

[#29502] [Bug #3143] [Ruby 1.8.7] Segmentation fault / stack level too deep — Daniel Ribeiro <redmine@...> 2010/04/13

Issue #3143 has been updated by Daniel Ribeiro.

[#29497] Calling malloc from signal handler — Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>

Hi,

1 message 2010/04/13

[#29501] [Bug #3144] resolv-replace Changes IPAddr.new() Behavior, Degrades IP Validation Rules — Paul Clegg <redmine@...>

Bug #3144: resolv-replace Changes IPAddr.new() Behavior, Degrades IP Validation Rules

3 messages 2010/04/13

[#30506] [Bug #3144][Closed] resolv-replace Changes IPAddr.new() Behavior, Degrades IP Validation Rules — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #3144 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#33824] [Backport87-Backport#3144][Closed] resolv-replace Changes IPAddr.new() Behavior, Degrades IP Validation Rules — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/12/23

Issue #3144 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#29509] [Bug #1393] Multiple assignment does not call to_a but to_ary — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Issue #1393 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

2 messages 2010/04/14

[#29803] Re: [Bug #1393] Multiple assignment does not call to_a but to_ary — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/27

Hi,

[#29514] [Bug #3147] gsub evaluates the passed in replacement string making results unpredictable when replacement string is dynamically generated — Wayne Walker <redmine@...>

Bug #3147: gsub evaluates the passed in replacement string making results unpredictable when replacement string is dynamically generated

5 messages 2010/04/14

[#29515] [Bug #3147] gsub evaluates the passed in replacement string making results unpredictable when replacement string is dynamically generated — Wayne Walker <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #3147 has been updated by Wayne Walker.

[#29521] [Bug #3147](Rejected) gsub evaluates the passed in replacement string making results unpredictable when replacement string is dynamically generated — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #3147 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#29522] [Bug #3147] gsub evaluates the passed in replacement string making results unpredictable when replacement string is dynamically generated — Wayne Walker <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #3147 has been updated by Wayne Walker.

[#29524] Re: [Bug #3147] gsub evaluates the passed in replacement string making results unpredictable when replacement string is dynamically generated — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/04/14

I use the pattern str.gsub(pattern) { replacement } when I'm not sure

[#29516] [Bug #3148] to_yaml on Hash with complex keys does not dump properly — Jason Frey <redmine@...>

Bug #3148: to_yaml on Hash with complex keys does not dump properly

3 messages 2010/04/14

[#29535] [Bug #3148](Closed) to_yaml on Hash with complex keys does not dump properly — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/04/15

Issue #3148 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#29544] [Bug #3148] to_yaml on Hash with complex keys does not dump properly — Jason Frey <redmine@...> 2010/04/15

Issue #3148 has been updated by Jason Frey.

[#29528] [Bug #3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #3150: net/https peer verification doesn't do anything

11 messages 2010/04/15

[#34230] [Ruby-Bug#3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Nathaniel Bibler <redmine@...> 2011/01/07

Issue #3150 has been updated by Nathaniel Bibler.

[#31776] [Bug #3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/08/19

Issue #3150 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[#31796] Re: [Bug #3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/08/20

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:12:47AM +0900, Hiroshi NAKAMURA wrote:

[#32087] [Ruby-Bug#3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/09/06

Issue #3150 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[#32168] Re: [Ruby-Bug#3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/09/08

On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:26:01AM +0900, Hiroshi NAKAMURA wrote:

[#32373] [Ruby-Bug#3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Justin Case <redmine@...> 2010/09/14

Issue #3150 has been updated by Justin Case.

[#33378] [Ruby-Bug#3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/11/25

Issue #3150 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[#33407] Re: [Ruby-Bug#3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/11/26

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 08:48:59PM +0900, Hiroshi NAKAMURA wrote:

[#33408] [Ruby-Bug#3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/11/26

Issue #3150 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[#34272] [Ruby-Bug#3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Martin Bosslet <redmine@...> 2011/01/09

Issue #3150 has been updated by Martin Bosslet.

[#29533] [Bug #3152] StringScanner is failing with symbols like # or { — Petr Kovar <redmine@...>

Bug #3152: StringScanner is failing with symbols like # or {

3 messages 2010/04/15

[#29540] Re: [Bug #3152] StringScanner is failing with symbols like # or { — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/04/15

[#29559] [Bug #3152](Rejected) StringScanner is failing with symbols like # or { — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #3152 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#29542] [Bug #3153] Ruby 1.8.6 One-Click Installer deleted my docs! — Marian Honsch <redmine@...>

Bug #3153: Ruby 1.8.6 One-Click Installer deleted my docs!

2 messages 2010/04/15

[#29543] [Bug #3153] Ruby 1.8.6 One-Click Installer deleted my docs! — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/04/15

Issue #3153 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#29553] [Bug #2059](Rejected) Marking internal functions as internal — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Issue #2059 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

1 message 2010/04/16

[#29556] [Bug #3159] BigDecimal broken in 32bit Ruby — Moritz Heidkamp <redmine@...>

Bug #3159: BigDecimal broken in 32bit Ruby

3 messages 2010/04/16

[#29566] [Bug #3159] BigDecimal broken in 32bit Ruby — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #3159 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#29963] [Backport #3159](Closed) BigDecimal broken in 32bit Ruby — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #3159 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#29570] [Bug #3160] rdoc registers wrong methods to Object class — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Bug #3160: rdoc registers wrong methods to Object class

2 messages 2010/04/17

[#29614] [Bug #3160] rdoc registers wrong methods to Object class — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #3160 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#29571] [Bug #3162] recent rdoc affects tests of rake — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Bug #3162: recent rdoc affects tests of rake

3 messages 2010/04/17

[#29574] [Bug #3162] recent rdoc affects tests of rake — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2010/04/17

Issue #3162 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#29575] Re: [Bug #3162] recent rdoc affects tests of rake — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/04/17

Hi,

[#29578] [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Bug #3163: SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument

17 messages 2010/04/17

[#29583] [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/04/18

Issue #3163 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#29584] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/04/18

On 18 April 2010 02:06, caleb clausen <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#29585] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/04/18

On 18.04.10 02:23, Benoit Daloze wrote:

[#29587] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/18

On 4/17/10, Benoit Daloze <eregontp@gmail.com> wrote:

[#29589] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/04/18

On 18.04.10 04:34, Caleb Clausen wrote:

[#29593] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/18

On 4/17/10, Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@rubychan.de> wrote:

[#29594] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/04/18

On 18.04.10 07:07, Caleb Clausen wrote:

[#29618] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/04/19

Hi,

[#29592] [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/04/18

Issue #3163 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#29590] [Bug #3163](Closed) SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/18

Issue #3163 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29595] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/04/18

On 17.04.10 20:26, Benoit Daloze wrote:

[#29598] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/04/18

>as in a ? b : c.

[#29600] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/04/18

On 18.04.10 16:10, Benoit Daloze wrote:

[#29604] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/18

On 4/18/10, Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@rubychan.de> wrote:

[#29606] Re: [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/04/18

On 18 April 2010 23:46, Caleb Clausen <vikkous@gmail.com> wrote:

[#29639] [Bug #3163] SyntaxError when using variable which is also a method in current scope with a Symbol argument — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #3163 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#29579] Parse errors in 1.9.2 — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

This code parses in 1.9.1, but not in 1.9.2. Is this a bug, or expected

4 messages 2010/04/17

[#29582] Re: Parse errors in 1.9.2 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/17

[#29591] Re: Parse errors in 1.9.2 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/04/18

Hi,

[#29581] Re: Parse errors in 1.9.2 — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/17

On 4/17/10, Aaron Patterson <aaron@tenderlovemaking.com> wrote:

[#29580] [Bug #3164] [BUG] Segmentation fault — paranormal dev <redmine@...>

Bug #3164: [BUG] Segmentation fault

4 messages 2010/04/17

[#29588] [Backport #3164](Assigned) [BUG] Segmentation fault — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/18

Issue #3164 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29597] [Backport #3164] [BUG] Segmentation fault — paranormal dev <redmine@...> 2010/04/18

Issue #3164 has been updated by paranormal dev.

[#29962] [Backport #3164](Closed) [BUG] Segmentation fault — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #3164 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#29601] [Bug #3167] RDoc issues in interactive mode — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Bug #3167: RDoc issues in interactive mode

5 messages 2010/04/18

[#30151] [Bug #3167] RDoc issues in interactive mode — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/11

Issue #3167 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30161] Re: [Bug #3167] RDoc issues in interactive mode — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/11

Hi,

[#30162] Fwd: [Bug #3167] RDoc issues in interactive mode — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/11

Hi,

[#30180] [Bug #3167] RDoc issues in interactive mode — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/12

Issue #3167 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#29608] [Bug #3169] RDoc crossref confused by instance and class methods having same name — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #3169: RDoc crossref confused by instance and class methods having same name

6 messages 2010/04/19

[#29611] [Bug #3169] RDoc crossref confused by instance and class methods having same name — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #3169 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#29615] Re: [Bug #3169] RDoc crossref confused by instance and class methods having same name — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/04/19

On 19.04.10 05:36, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#29619] Re: [Bug #3169] RDoc crossref confused by instance and class methods having same name — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/04/19

On Apr 18, 2010, at 21:28, Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:

[#29643] Re: [Bug #3169] RDoc crossref confused by instance and class methods having same name — Tomo Kazahaya <tomonacci@...> 2010/04/20

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#29646] Re: [Bug #3169] RDoc crossref confused by instance and class methods having same name — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/04/20

On Apr 19, 2010, at 20:53, Tomo Kazahaya wrote:

[#29610] [Backport #3171] require '~/file.rb does not expand path before storing in $" — Brian Ford <redmine@...>

Backport #3171: require '~/file.rb does not expand path before storing in $"

3 messages 2010/04/19

[#29625] [Bug #3171] require '~/file.rb does not expand path before storing in $" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #3171 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29626] [Bug #3171](Closed) require '~/file.rb does not expand path before storing in $" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #3171 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29621] [Bug #3174] segmentation fault at running Array method each — Ingo Meierhoff <redmine@...>

Bug #3174: segmentation fault at running Array method each

6 messages 2010/04/19

[#29628] [Bug #3174] segmentation fault at running Array method each — Ingo Meierhoff <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #3174 has been updated by Ingo Meierhoff.

[#29623] Re: [Bug #3174] segmentation fault at running Array method each — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/19

Hi,

[#29624] [Bug #3174](Feedback) segmentation fault at running Array method each — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #3174 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29635] [Bug #3174] segmentation fault at running Array method each — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #3174 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#29766] [Bug #3174] segmentation fault at running Array method each — Ingo Meierhoff <redmine@...> 2010/04/23

Issue #3174 has been updated by Ingo Meierhoff.

[#29627] [Bug #3175] extname and basename fail in "foo//bar.rb" style paths. — rico gloeckner <redmine@...>

Bug #3175: extname and basename fail in "foo//bar.rb" style paths.

2 messages 2010/04/19

[#29633] [Bug #3175](Closed) extname and basename fail in "foo//bar.rb" style paths. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #3175 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29634] stack dumps without code examples — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...>

On 4/19/10, Ingo Meierhoff <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

1 message 2010/04/19

[#29641] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — caleb clausen <redmine@...>

Feature #3176: Thread#priority= should actually do something

28 messages 2010/04/19

[#29688] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #3176 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#29694] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/04/21

Hi.

[#29712] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/21

On 4/21/10, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:

[#30220] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #3176 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30227] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/13

On 5/13/10, Yusuke Endoh <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#30256] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/05/15

> Issue #3176 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30257] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/05/15

> The test result of caleb's testcase is,

[#30260] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/05/15

> Note: if we use /proc/sys/kernel/sched_compat_yield=1, we can get better result.

[#30258] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/15

On 5/15/10, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:

[#30259] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/05/15

Hi

[#30262] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/16

On 5/15/10, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:

[#30279] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/05/17

Issue #3176 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#30281] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/05/17

> I tried to make it use pthread_setschedparam on linux. That would seem to be

[#30285] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/17

On 5/17/10, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:

[#30291] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/05/18

>> setschedparam()? no, it's for real time thread mess. please don't use it.

[#29693] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #3176 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#30170] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/05/11

Issue #3176 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#30232] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/05/14

2010/5/12 caleb clausen <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#30245] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/14

On 5/13/10, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#30171] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/05/11

Issue #3176 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#30194] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/05/12

> File thread-priorities-try2.diff added

[#30202] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/13

On 5/12/10, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:

[#30286] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/05/17

Issue #3176 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#30294] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/05/18

Issue #3176 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#30306] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/05/19

Issue #3176 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#30310] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/05/19

Hi

[#30360] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/05/22

Issue #3176 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#29649] [Bug #3178] Fileutils#rmdir does rescue Dir Errors without raising new — rico gloeckner <redmine@...>

Bug #3178: Fileutils#rmdir does rescue Dir Errors without raising new

3 messages 2010/04/20

[#29786] [Bug #3178] Fileutils#rmdir does rescue Dir Errors without raising new — rico gloeckner <redmine@...> 2010/04/25

Issue #3178 has been updated by rico gloeckner.

[#29650] [Bug #3178] Fileutils#rmdir does rescue Dir Errors without raising new — rico gloeckner <redmine@...> 2010/04/20

Issue #3178 has been updated by rico gloeckner.

[#29658] [Bug #3181] Possible regexp regression in 1.9.1-p378 — Thomas Leitner <redmine@...>

Bug #3181: Possible regexp regression in 1.9.1-p378

3 messages 2010/04/20

[#31860] [Bug #3181] Possible regexp regression in 1.9.1-p378 — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/08/26

Issue #3181 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#29678] [Bug #3181](Rejected) Possible regexp regression in 1.9.1-p378 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #3181 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#29670] "include X; include Y" vs "include X, Y" — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2010/04/20

[#29674] Re: "include X; include Y" vs "include X, Y" — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/20

On 4/20/10, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:

[#29675] Re: "include X; include Y" vs "include X, Y" — Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...> 2010/04/20

Caleb Clausen wrote:

[#29673] Re: "include X; include Y" vs "include X, Y" — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/04/20

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#29680] Re: "include X; include Y" vs "include X, Y" — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/04/21

Hi,

[#29685] Re: "include X; include Y" vs "include X, Y" — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2010/04/21

Shugo Maeda wrote:

[#29676] r27417 breaks parsing — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

After r27417, this code does not work:

1 message 2010/04/20

[#29677] anonymous Module#name returns nil in 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

Is this intentional?

6 messages 2010/04/21

[#29772] Re: anonymous Module#name returns nil in 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/04/23

[#29774] Re: anonymous Module#name returns nil in 1.9 — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2010/04/23

In my view nil makes more sense than an empty string. An anonymous

[#29775] Re: anonymous Module#name returns nil in 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/04/23

[#29779] Re: anonymous Module#name returns nil in 1.9 — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2010/04/24

On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:

[#29776] Re: anonymous Module#name returns nil in 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/24

Hi,

[#29698] [Bug #3183] "[BUG] The handle is invalid." when working with Threads — John Briggs <redmine@...>

Bug #3183: "[BUG] The handle is invalid." when working with Threads

5 messages 2010/04/21

[#29705] [Bug #3183] "[BUG] The handle is invalid." when working with Threads — John Briggs <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #3183 has been updated by John Briggs.

[#29707] [Bug #3183] "[BUG] The handle is invalid." when working with Threads — John Briggs <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #3183 has been updated by John Briggs.

[#29728] [Bug #3183] "[BUG] The handle is invalid." when working with Threads — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/04/22

Issue #3183 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#30134] [Bug #3183](Closed) "[BUG] The handle is invalid." when working with Threads — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/05/10

Issue #3183 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#29708] [Bug #3184] Unable to validates_presence_of if collection_select in form. — mike montagne <redmine@...>

Bug #3184: Unable to validates_presence_of if collection_select in form.

2 messages 2010/04/21

[#29711] [Bug #3184] Unable to validates_presence_of if collection_select in form. — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #3184 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#29710] [Bug #3185] File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path — Brian Ford <redmine@...>

Bug #3185: File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path

10 messages 2010/04/21

[#29807] [Bug #3185] File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path — Brian Ford <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #3185 has been updated by Brian Ford.

[#29828] Re: [Bug #3185] File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/04/27

[#29834] Re: [Bug #3185] File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path — brian ford <brixen@...> 2010/04/28

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:

[#29875] Re: [Bug #3185] File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/04/29

(2010/04/28 17:02), brian ford wrote:

[#29798] [Bug #3185](Rejected) File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/26

Issue #3185 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29800] Re: [Bug #3185](Rejected) File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/04/27

Hello,

[#29799] [Bug #3185] File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path — "ujihisa ." <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #3185 has been updated by ujihisa ..

[#29796] [Bug #3185] File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path — "ujihisa ." <redmine@...> 2010/04/26

Issue #3185 has been updated by ujihisa ..

[#29797] [Bug #3185] File.expand_path repeats forward slashes at the beginning of the path — "ujihisa ." <redmine@...> 2010/04/26

Issue #3185 has been updated by ujihisa ..

[#29720] [BUG] Stack consistency error when running ripper parser events test — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

$ make test-all TESTS="ripper/test_parser_events.rb -n test_operator_ambiguous -v"

1 message 2010/04/22

[#29734] [Feature #3187] Allow dynamic Fiber stack size — Mike Perham <redmine@...>

Feature #3187: Allow dynamic Fiber stack size

2 messages 2010/04/22

[#29735] [Feature #3187] Allow dynamic Fiber stack size — Mike Perham <redmine@...> 2010/04/22

Issue #3187 has been updated by Mike Perham.

[#29737] [Bug #3188] remove_method.rb:3: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Sergio Lima <redmine@...>

Bug #3188: remove_method.rb:3: [BUG] Segmentation fault

1 message 2010/04/22

[#29738] [Bug #3189] [BUG] Segmentation fault — Brett Dawkins <redmine@...>

Bug #3189: [BUG] Segmentation fault

2 messages 2010/04/22

[#29743] Re: [Bug #3189] [BUG] Segmentation fault — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/22

Hi,

[#29739] [Bug #3190] Segmentation fault gzip/tar — Brett Dawkins <redmine@...>

Bug #3190: Segmentation fault gzip/tar

3 messages 2010/04/22

[#29740] [Bug #3190] Segmentation fault gzip/tar — Brett Dawkins <redmine@...> 2010/04/22

Issue #3190 has been updated by Brett Dawkins.

[#29741] [Bug #3190] Segmentation fault gzip/tar — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/04/22

Issue #3190 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#29745] [Bug #3191] imap exits on login with invalid credentials — Karl Baum <redmine@...>

Bug #3191: imap exits on login with invalid credentials

8 messages 2010/04/23

[#29808] [Backport #3191](Assigned) imap exits on login with invalid credentials — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #3191 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29746] Re: [Bug #3191] imap exits on login with invalid credentials — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/04/23

Hi,

[#29767] [Bug #3191] imap exits on login with invalid credentials — Karl Baum <redmine@...> 2010/04/23

Issue #3191 has been updated by Karl Baum.

[#29777] Re: [Bug #3191] imap exits on login with invalid credentials — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/24

Hi,

[#29802] [Bug #3191] imap exits on login with invalid credentials — Karl Baum <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #3191 has been updated by Karl Baum.

[#29918] [Backport #3191] imap exits on login with invalid credentials — Karl Baum <redmine@...> 2010/05/01

Issue #3191 has been updated by Karl Baum.

[#30109] [Backport #3191](Closed) imap exits on login with invalid credentials — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2010/05/08

Issue #3191 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#29749] [Bug #3192] Missing Set#keep_if, select! [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #3192: Missing Set#keep_if, select! [patch]

2 messages 2010/04/23

[#30529] [Bug #3192][Closed] Missing Set#keep_if, select! [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #3192 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#29750] [Bug #3193] uint is not parsed in dl/cparser.rb — Vincent Carmona <redmine@...>

Bug #3193: uint is not parsed in dl/cparser.rb

3 messages 2010/04/23

[#30561] [Bug #3193] uint is not parsed in dl/cparser.rb — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/06/02

Issue #3193 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#30565] [Bug #3193] uint is not parsed in dl/cparser.rb — Vincent Carmona <redmine@...> 2010/06/03

Issue #3193 has been updated by Vincent Carmona.

[#29753] [Bug #3194] Segmentation fault in rb_hash_tbl — Vincent Carmona <redmine@...>

Bug #3194: Segmentation fault in rb_hash_tbl

6 messages 2010/04/23

[#29755] [Bug #3194] Segmentation fault in rb_hash_tbl — Vincent Carmona <redmine@...> 2010/04/23

Issue #3194 has been updated by Vincent Carmona.

[#29756] [Bug #3194] Segmentation fault in rb_hash_tbl — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/23

Issue #3194 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29757] [Bug #3194] Segmentation fault in rb_hash_tbl — Vincent Carmona <redmine@...> 2010/04/23

Issue #3194 has been updated by Vincent Carmona.

[#29754] [Bug #3194](Feedback) Segmentation fault in rb_hash_tbl — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/23

Issue #3194 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#31731] [Bug #3194] Segmentation fault in rb_hash_tbl — Vincent Carmona <redmine@...> 2010/08/16

Issue #3194 has been updated by Vincent Carmona.

[#29759] small patch for syck — Marcus Rueckert <darix@...>

hi,

1 message 2010/04/23

[#29773] Fixes for test-all on OSX — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'm pretty sure these are wrong somewhere, but since I can't run `make test-all` I have nothing to compare against. Regardless, the design changes help. Switching to lazy accessors instead of creating these servers at file load time will help.

2 messages 2010/04/23

[#29778] Re: Fixes for test-all on OSX — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/04/24

Hi,

[#29780] test/rdoc/test_rdoc_rdoc.rb leaves temporary files — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

test/rdoc/test_rdoc_rdoc.rb leaves temporary files as follows.

2 messages 2010/04/24

[#29806] Re: test/rdoc/test_rdoc_rdoc.rb leaves temporary files — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/04/27

On Apr 24, 2010, at 05:31, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#29782] [Backport #3195] BasicObject in 1.8.8 — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...>

Backport #3195: BasicObject in 1.8.8

3 messages 2010/04/24

[#29783] Re: [Backport #3195] BasicObject in 1.8.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/24

Hi,

[#29904] [Backport #3195] BasicObject in 1.8.8 — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...> 2010/04/30

Issue #3195 has been updated by Thomas Sawyer.

[#29784] [Feature #3200] String#gsub! doesn't error on frozen string — Brian Candler <redmine@...>

Feature #3200: String#gsub! doesn't error on frozen string

2 messages 2010/04/25

[#29785] [Feature #3200] String#gsub! doesn't error on frozen string — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/25

Issue #3200 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29788] [Bug #3201] Backport request for r25932 to 1.9.1 branch (gem_prelude.rb) — Cezary Baginski <redmine@...>

Bug #3201: Backport request for r25932 to 1.9.1 branch (gem_prelude.rb)

1 message 2010/04/25

[#29792] [Bug #3202] potential regression? \w in regex doesn't match umlauts anymore. — Andreas Fuchs <redmine@...>

Bug #3202: potential regression? \w in regex doesn't match umlauts anymore.

2 messages 2010/04/26

[#29793] [Bug #3202](Rejected) potential regression? \w in regex doesn't match umlauts anymore. — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/26

Issue #3202 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#29804] [Bug #1393] Multiple assignment does not call to_a but to_ary — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Issue #1393 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

1 message 2010/04/27

[#29809] [Bug #3205] Problem with recent update to lib/net/smtp.rb rcptto_list method — Daniel Mavis <redmine@...>

Bug #3205: Problem with recent update to lib/net/smtp.rb rcptto_list method

2 messages 2010/04/27

[#29810] [Bug #3205](Closed) Problem with recent update to lib/net/smtp.rb rcptto_list method — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #3205 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29811] [Bug #3206] Problems manipulating the signal mask with Ruby — Mark Somerville <redmine@...>

Bug #3206: Problems manipulating the signal mask with Ruby

1 message 2010/04/27

[#29812] identifying process of show stoppers for 1.9.2 release — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi, all

6 messages 2010/04/27

[#29832] Re: identifying process of show stoppers for 1.9.2 release — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/04/27

Yusuke ENDOH wrote:

[#29833] Re: identifying process of show stoppers for 1.9.2 release — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/04/28

Hi,

[#29844] Re: identifying process of show stoppers for 1.9.2 release — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...> 2010/04/28

On 28/04/10 at 09:39 +0900, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:

[#29860] Re: identifying process of show stoppers for 1.9.2 release — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2010/04/28

> > > Just wondering - which platforms are considered "best effort"? Windows?

[#30199] Re: identifying process of show stoppers for 1.9.2 release — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/05/12

> In May, we will identify bug tickets that should be closed before

[#29815] [Feature #3207] refinement of IO's bizarre behavior — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Feature #3207: refinement of IO's bizarre behavior

2 messages 2010/04/27

[#30159] Re: [Feature #3207] refinement of IO's bizarre behavior — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/05/11

> There are some issues reported about IO's bizarre behavior.

[#29821] [Bug #3208] xmlrpc is incompatible with development head — HD Moore <redmine@...>

Bug #3208: xmlrpc is incompatible with development head

6 messages 2010/04/27

[#29862] [Bug #3208] xmlrpc is incompatible with development head — James Gray <redmine@...> 2010/04/28

Issue #3208 has been updated by James Gray.

[#29824] [Bug #3208] xmlrpc is incompatible with development head — HD Moore <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #3208 has been updated by HD Moore.

[#29822] [Bug #3208] xmlrpc is incompatible with development head — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #3208 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#29823] [Bug #3208] xmlrpc is incompatible with development head — HD Moore <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #3208 has been updated by HD Moore.

[#29825] [Bug #3208] xmlrpc is incompatible with development head — James Gray <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #3208 has been updated by James Gray.

[#29827] [Bug #3209] r27374 typo in net/smtp — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...>

Bug #3209: r27374 typo in net/smtp

2 messages 2010/04/27

[#29829] [Bug #3209](Closed) r27374 typo in net/smtp — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #3209 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29830] [Bug #3210] Problem compiling ruby 1.9.1-p376 — pierre b <redmine@...>

Bug #3210: Problem compiling ruby 1.9.1-p376

3 messages 2010/04/27

[#29831] [Bug #3210] Problem compiling ruby 1.9.1-p376 — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #3210 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#30150] [Bug #3210](Rejected) Problem compiling ruby 1.9.1-p376 — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/11

Issue #3210 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#29835] [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...>

Bug #3212: ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads

24 messages 2010/04/28

[#29840] [Bug #3212](Rejected) ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/28

Issue #3212 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30015] [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...> 2010/05/05

Issue #3212 has been updated by Sylvain Joyeux.

[#30017] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/05/05

Hi,

[#30039] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/05

On 5/5/10, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:

[#30060] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/05/06

Hi,

[#30063] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/06

On 5/6/10, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:

[#30074] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/05/07

Hi,

[#30075] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/05/07

2010/5/7 Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:

[#30076] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/07

On 5/6/10, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:

[#30089] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...> 2010/05/07

Caleb Clausen wrote:

[#29958] [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #3212 has been updated by Sylvain Joyeux.

[#29966] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/05/03

Hi,

[#29959] [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #3212 has been updated by Sylvain Joyeux.

[#29961] [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #3212 has been updated by Sylvain Joyeux.

[#29967] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/05/03

Hi,

[#29970] [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #3212 has been updated by Sylvain Joyeux.

[#29971] [Bug #3212](Open) ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #3212 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30000] [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...> 2010/05/04

Issue #3212 has been updated by Sylvain Joyeux.

[#30008] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/05/05

Hi,

[#30014] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/05/05

Hi,

[#30001] [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...> 2010/05/04

Issue #3212 has been updated by Sylvain Joyeux.

[#30091] [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...> 2010/05/07

Issue #3212 has been updated by Sylvain Joyeux.

[#30092] Re: [Bug #3212] ConditionVariable may become inconsistent for interrupted threads — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/05/07

Hi,

[#29838] [Bug #3213] ConditionVariable#wait in main thread silently returns when a signal is received — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...>

Bug #3213: ConditionVariable#wait in main thread silently returns when a signal is received

2 messages 2010/04/28

[#29841] [Bug #3213](Rejected) ConditionVariable#wait in main thread silently returns when a signal is received — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/28

Issue #3213 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#29839] [Bug #3214] Missing function name in "Wrong number of arguments" exception backtrace — Evgeniy Dolzhenko <redmine@...>

Bug #3214: Missing function name in "Wrong number of arguments" exception backtrace

2 messages 2010/04/28

[#31293] [Bug #3214][Closed] Missing function name in "Wrong number of arguments" exception backtrace — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/07/14

Issue #3214 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#29845] [Bug #3215] Windows: IO.popen returns "handle is invalid" — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>

Bug #3215: Windows: IO.popen returns "handle is invalid"

7 messages 2010/04/28

[#29856] [Bug #3215] Windows: IO.popen returns "handle is invalid" — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/04/28

Issue #3215 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#29858] [Bug #3215] Windows: IO.popen returns "handle is invalid" — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2010/04/28

Issue #3215 has been updated by Jon Forums.

[#29883] [Bug #3215](Feedback) Windows: IO.popen returns "handle is invalid" — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/29

Issue #3215 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#30211] [Bug #3215] Windows: IO.popen returns "handle is invalid" — Christian Höltje <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #3215 has been updated by Christian H旦ltje.

[#30225] Re: [Bug #3215] Windows: IO.popen returns "handle is invalid" — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/05/13

> It is Windows 2003 Server. connect via rdesktop. 'm using Visual Studio 8 (aka 2005) to compile ruby. don't know if it happens with mingw, etc.

[#30471] [Bug #3215] Windows: IO.popen returns "handle is invalid" — Christian Höltje <redmine@...> 2010/05/27

Issue #3215 has been updated by Christian H旦ltje.

[#29859] [Bug #2063] Core dump on AIX — Yutaka Kanemoto <redmine@...>

Issue #2063 has been updated by Yutaka Kanemoto.

1 message 2010/04/28

[#29863] [Bug #3216] #join in thwait.rb only waits for first thread — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #3216: #join in thwait.rb only waits for first thread

4 messages 2010/04/28

[#29871] [Bug #3216](Closed) #join in thwait.rb only waits for first thread — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/29

Issue #3216 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29877] Re: [Bug #3216] #join in thwait.rb only waits for first thread — keiju@... (keiju ISHITSUKA) 2010/04/29

Hi. Roger,

[#29888] Re: [Bug #3216] #join in thwait.rb only waits for first thread — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/04/29

>>Thwait#join's rdoc says it will "wait for all threads" but currently

[#29864] [Bug #3217] Regexp fails to match string with '<' when encoding is UTF-8 — Brian Ford <redmine@...>

Bug #3217: Regexp fails to match string with '<' when encoding is UTF-8

5 messages 2010/04/28

[#29981] [Bug #3217](Rejected) Regexp fails to match string with '<' when encoding is UTF-8 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #3217 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#29880] Re: [Bug #3217] Regexp fails to match string with '<' when encoding is UTF-8 — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/04/29

2010/4/29 Brian Ford <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#29950] [Bug #3217](Rejected) Regexp fails to match string with '<' when encoding is UTF-8 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #3217 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#29951] [Bug #3217](Assigned) Regexp fails to match string with '<' when encoding is UTF-8 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #3217 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#29866] [Bug #3218] Cannot cross-compile Ruby 1.8.7 (svn) using Ruby 1.8.7 — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #3218: Cannot cross-compile Ruby 1.8.7 (svn) using Ruby 1.8.7

3 messages 2010/04/28

[#32345] [Ruby 1.8.7-Bug#3218] Cannot cross-compile Ruby 1.8.7 (svn) using Ruby 1.8.7 — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/09/12

Issue #3218 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#29867] [Bug #3218] Cannot cross-compile Ruby 1.8.7 (svn) using Ruby 1.8.7 — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/04/28

Issue #3218 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#29868] [Bug:trunk] assert now passes non-boolean result — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2010/04/29

[#29908] Re: [Bug:trunk] assert now passes non-boolean result — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/05/01

2010/4/29 Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>:

[#29869] [Bug #3219](Closed) assert now passes non-boolean result — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/29

Issue #3219 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#29872] Re: [Bug #3219](Closed) assert now passes non-boolean result — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/04/29

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:17:06PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#29873] Re: [Bug #3219](Closed) assert now passes non-boolean result — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/04/29

Hi,

[#29884] [Backport #3219] assert now passes non-boolean result — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/04/29

Issue #3219 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#29910] Re: [Backport #3219] assert now passes non-boolean result — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/05/01

On Apr 29, 2010, at 09:12, caleb clausen wrote:

[#29912] Re: [Backport #3219] assert now passes non-boolean result — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/05/01

Hi,

[#30007] Re: [Backport #3219] assert now passes non-boolean result — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/05/04

[#29890] Re: [Backport #3219] assert now passes non-boolean result — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/04/29

> It is all too easy to write assert(foo, bar) when you meant to write assert_equal(foo, bar). I have made the same mistake myself a number of times. Usually, no error will result because assert allows an optional second parameter (an alternate String to be printed when the assertion fails).

[#29902] Re: [Backport #3219] assert now passes non-boolean result — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/04/30

Hi,

[#29903] Re: [Backport #3219] assert now passes non-boolean result — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/30

On 4/30/10, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote: