[#29911] [Bug #3231] Digest Does Not Build — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #3231: Digest Does Not Build

19 messages 2010/05/01

[#29920] [Feature #3232] Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #3232: Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless

9 messages 2010/05/01

[#29997] years in Time.utc — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Does anyone have a precise statement about the years supported by

13 messages 2010/05/04

[#30010] [Bug #3248] extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #3248: extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly

9 messages 2010/05/05

[#30226] [Bug #3288] Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88 — Szymon Jeż <redmine@...>

Bug #3288: Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88

10 messages 2010/05/13

[#30358] tk doesn't startup well in doze — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Currently with 1.9.x and tk 8.5,the following occurs

12 messages 2010/05/22

[ruby-core:30245] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something

From: Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...>
Date: 2010-05-14 16:09:46 UTC
List: ruby-core #30245
On 5/13/10, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
> 2010/5/12 caleb clausen <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
>> Ffs is a bit-scanning routine present on most (all?) unix systems. On most
>> See http://linux.die.net/man/3/ffs
>
> I added ffs() function for Ruby internal.
> (I used it in time.c)
>
> So you don't need to provide ffs() in C level.

Nice! Thank you.

> I think Fixnum#ffs and Bignum#ffs should be separated from Thread#priority=
> issue.

Yeah, fair enough. I wanted to have it in ruby so I could write a test
for the back-up version of ffs I wrote in c. But I haven't written
that test yet... (Also, I've wanted ffs in ruby  before.) But it is a
different feature and doesn't really belong in this patch.

In This Thread