[#29911] [Bug #3231] Digest Does Not Build — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>
Bug #3231: Digest Does Not Build
[#29920] [Feature #3232] Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
Feature #3232: Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless
Hi,
On 2 May 2010 01:56, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 2 May 2010 15:24:52 UTC+2, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#29953] [Bug #3241] gem update --system Segmentation fault — Benedikt Eickhoff <redmine@...>
Bug #3241: gem update --system Segmentation fault
Hi,
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 08:55:14PM +0900, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#29993] [Feature:trunk] thread-local yamler — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
[#29997] years in Time.utc — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
Does anyone have a precise statement about the years supported by
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[#30002] 1.9.1 lib dirs? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hi all.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:
[#30010] [Bug #3248] extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #3248: extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly
Issue #3248 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#30023] [Bug #3250] [BUG] Segmentation fault — Diogo Almeida <redmine@...>
Bug #3250: [BUG] Segmentation fault
[#30070] [Bug #3255] Trunk fail to build without explicit ./configure options (yaml.h not found) — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
Bug #3255: Trunk fail to build without explicit ./configure options (yaml.h not found)
Hi,
[#30094] suggestion: switch default name for BINARY encoding — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Situation:
(2010/05/08 7:50), Roger Pack wrote:
[#30145] [Bug #3273] Float string conversion — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #3273: Float string conversion
[#30154] [Bug #3275] incompatibility of testrb — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>
Bug #3275: incompatibility of testrb
[#30175] [Problem] DATA and __END__ in a loaded rb file — Charles Cui <zheng.cuizh@...>
how to get global constant DATA in file <a.rb>,if a.rb is loaded by b.rb.
[#30182] [Bug #3281] fail to build fiddle on Debian/lenny by default — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>
Bug #3281: fail to build fiddle on Debian/lenny by default
2010/5/12 Yusuke Endoh <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:26:44PM +0900, Tanaka Akira wrote:
2010/5/14 Aaron Patterson <aaron@tenderlovemaking.com>:
[#30226] [Bug #3288] Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88 — Szymon Jeż <redmine@...>
Bug #3288: Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88
Issue #3288 has been updated by Szymon Je甜.
[#30249] [Bug #3299] revision.h rule in common.mk is broken for MSVC — Romulo Ceccon <redmine@...>
Bug #3299: revision.h rule in common.mk is broken for MSVC
[#30290] [Bug #3309] net/http calls leak memory and file handles in windows — Pete Higgins <redmine@...>
Bug #3309: net/http calls leak memory and file handles in windows
[#30315] [Bug #3320] emacs ruby-mode.el font-lock fails on symboled string ending with ? — Zev Blut <redmine@...>
Bug #3320: emacs ruby-mode.el font-lock fails on symboled string ending with ?
[#30323] [Feature #3322] Simple Patch to make ruby copy-on-write-friendly — Daniel DeLorme <redmine@...>
Feature #3322: Simple Patch to make ruby copy-on-write-friendly
[#30358] tk doesn't startup well in doze — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Currently with 1.9.x and tk 8.5,the following occurs
From: Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com>
> Does it occur with RubyTk-Kit version (it based on latest tcltklib.c)?
[#30401] [Bug #3336] Memory leak in IO.select() on Windows — HD Moore <redmine@...>
Bug #3336: Memory leak in IO.select() on Windows
[#30406] [Bug #3337] MS-DOS device names are identified as readable_real — HD Moore <redmine@...>
Bug #3337: MS-DOS device names are identified as readable_real
[#30434] [Feature #3346] __DIR__ revisted — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...>
Feature #3346: __DIR__ revisted
[#30449] [Bug #3350] Protected methods & documentation — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #3350: Protected methods & documentation
[#30451] [Bug #3352] Delegates: protected methods — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #3352: Delegates: protected methods
[#30513] [Bug #3365] floats revisited (see bug 1841) — Roberto Tomás Collins McCarthy <redmine@...>
Bug #3365: floats revisited (see bug 1841)
[ruby-core:30256] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something
> Issue #3176 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
>
> Assigned to set to Koichi Sasada
> Target version set to 1.9.x
>
> Hi, Caleb
>
> Great. glanced over your patch. think the biggest change is how
> thread waits GVL. t is quite funny because ko1 recently does the
> same to fix another issue (thread starvation on many core environment).
> (The fix have not been committed yet.)
> I had concerned its performance cost, but if ko1 agrees with it, I
> also agree.
>
> However, ko1 seems to still dislike the priority support for some
> reason. don't know the precise reason. e said he would answer to
> this ticket, so please wait for him.
>
>
> Anyway, thank you for your writing a patch.
>
> One comment for the patch: not-static functions (like pqueue_*) should
> prefix "rb_" to avoid conflict with symbols of other projects, even if
> they are just for internal.
Alternative patch is here. I mean we should use os's thread priority
interface if possible.
The test result of caleb's testcase is,
./ruby projects/thrprio/thrprio.rb
315662770 209679 0.9986723818385312 true
Hmm...
Current MRI internal seems to have too many yield() and sleep(). Linux
setpriority()
give a thread to 1.25 times timeslice bonus per a nice. but this test but now
t1 got about 1500 times bonus against t2. ;-)
diff --git a/thread_pthread.c b/thread_pthread.c
index e6295db..dd66c40 100644
--- a/thread_pthread.c
+++ b/thread_pthread.c
@@ -535,7 +535,23 @@ native_thread_join(pthread_t th)
static void
native_thread_apply_priority(rb_thread_t *th)
{
-#if defined(_POSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING) && (_POSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING > 0)
+#ifdef linux
+ int priority = 0 - th->priority;
+
+ if (priority > 19)
+ priority = 19;
+
+ /*
+ * No privileged can't use <0 priority. But we don't need care it.
+ * Setpriority() naturally ignore such call.
+ */
+ if (priority < -20)
+ priority = -20;
+
+ /* Strangely, Linux's setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS) change per-thread
priority. */
+ setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, 0, priority);
+ return;
+#elif defined(_POSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING) && (_POSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING > 0)
struct sched_param sp;
int policy;
int priority = 0 - th->priority;