[#29911] [Bug #3231] Digest Does Not Build — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #3231: Digest Does Not Build

19 messages 2010/05/01

[#29920] [Feature #3232] Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #3232: Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless

9 messages 2010/05/01

[#29997] years in Time.utc — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Does anyone have a precise statement about the years supported by

13 messages 2010/05/04

[#30010] [Bug #3248] extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #3248: extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly

9 messages 2010/05/05

[#30226] [Bug #3288] Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88 — Szymon Jeż <redmine@...>

Bug #3288: Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88

10 messages 2010/05/13

[#30358] tk doesn't startup well in doze — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Currently with 1.9.x and tk 8.5,the following occurs

12 messages 2010/05/22

[ruby-core:30360] [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something

From: caleb clausen <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-05-22 00:34:27 UTC
List: ruby-core #30360
Issue #3176 has been updated by caleb clausen.

File setpriority_wont_work.diff added

I'm attaching a patch for using setpriority on linux and thereby bypassing (on that platform) all the priority queue stuff which my patch implements. setpriority still doesn't work for me, so this patch is to be considered highly experimental. (Just warning those who might not otherwise know.) This patch should be applied on top of my other patches.

I am using ubuntu 9.04. My uname -a shows this:
Linux baytree 2.6.28-18-generic #60-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 12 04:40:52 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux

I may have missed the point again with this patch. I have been remarkably dense when it comes to this whole setpriority issue.

All my patches are relative to 27911 (??I think??), and therefore slightly stale. Lemme know if this is problem and I can update them again. 
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3176

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next