From: Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
Date: 2010-04-24T17:45:12+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:29779] Re: anonymous Module#name returns nil in 1.9

On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:

> Not "by definition"... which is why I'm asking.

I meant that being anonymous means having no name in the ordinary
usage of the word.

Now a formal language may not adhere to that convention, 1.8 didn't
exactly in my view, but having no name is better represented as nil in
my opinion.

That didn't answer you question anyway, only expressed that I wouldn't
expect it to be a bug as you did.