[#29911] [Bug #3231] Digest Does Not Build — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #3231: Digest Does Not Build

19 messages 2010/05/01

[#29920] [Feature #3232] Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #3232: Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless

9 messages 2010/05/01

[#29997] years in Time.utc — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Does anyone have a precise statement about the years supported by

13 messages 2010/05/04

[#30010] [Bug #3248] extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #3248: extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly

9 messages 2010/05/05

[#30226] [Bug #3288] Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88 — Szymon Jeż <redmine@...>

Bug #3288: Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88

10 messages 2010/05/13

[#30358] tk doesn't startup well in doze — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Currently with 1.9.x and tk 8.5,the following occurs

12 messages 2010/05/22

[ruby-core:30386] Re: [Bug #3112] require "yaml" doesn't use psych as default

From: Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
Date: 2010-05-23 23:29:04 UTC
List: ruby-core #30386
Bump.

I think the lack of a Syck maintainer, yet making Syck the default in 1.9.2
needs to be addressed. 1.9.2 is probably going to be the de-facto release
for some time. What's the rationale for keeping an unmaintained major
component when a maintained version is available in the standard library?

Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325


On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Aaron Patterson <
aaron@tenderlovemaking.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:30:14PM +0900, Yuki Sonoda wrote:
> > Issue #3112 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
> >
> > Target version changed from 1.9.2 to 1.9.x
> >
> > I think syck works more or less correctly unlike dl2. So I want to decide
> it conservatively. I don't want to switch the default yaml engine to psych.
>
> I'm afraid that if we use Syck as default, no one will see errors from
> invalid YAML files.  If we make Psych as default, people will see errors
> with their YAML files but *have the option* to move back to Syck.
>
> Are we going to remove Syck in 1.9.3?  If we don't make Psych default in
> 1.9.2, it seems to me that we have to wait until 1.9.4 to remove Syck.
>
> Since Syck has no active maintainer, it seems bad to wait so long to
> remove it.
>
> --
> Aaron Patterson
> http://tenderlovemaking.com/
>

In This Thread