From: Tomo Kazahaya Date: 2010-04-20T12:53:38+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:29643] Re: [Bug #3169] RDoc crossref confused by instance and class methods having same name --000e0cd2435cf39c3d0484a2f2cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Eric Hodel wrote: > I've seen no de-facto mapping in the community of Foo.bar to either > Foo::bar or Foo#bar. > In Japanese Ruby community, it's likely that Foo.bar refers to Foo::bar, the class method. For instance, in Japanese Ruby Reference Manual ( http://doc.okkez.net/192/view/ -- it's in Japanese, sorry), Foo.bar is the primary way to describe Foo::bar. In addition, Foo.#bar is used to describe a module function bar of module Foo. --000e0cd2435cf39c3d0484a2f2cd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:=
I've seen no de-facto mapping in the community of Foo.bar to either Foo= ::bar or Foo#bar.

In Japanese Ruby community, it&#= 39;s likely that Foo.bar refers to Foo::bar, the class method.
For insta= nce, in Japanese Ruby Reference Manual (http://doc.okkez.net/192/view/ -- it's in Japanese, sorry),=
Foo.bar is the primary way to describe Foo::bar.

In addition, Foo.#b= ar is used to describe a module function bar of module Foo.
--000e0cd2435cf39c3d0484a2f2cd--