[#29911] [Bug #3231] Digest Does Not Build — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #3231: Digest Does Not Build

19 messages 2010/05/01

[#29920] [Feature #3232] Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #3232: Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless

9 messages 2010/05/01

[#29997] years in Time.utc — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Does anyone have a precise statement about the years supported by

13 messages 2010/05/04

[#30010] [Bug #3248] extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #3248: extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly

9 messages 2010/05/05

[#30226] [Bug #3288] Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88 — Szymon Jeż <redmine@...>

Bug #3288: Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88

10 messages 2010/05/13

[#30358] tk doesn't startup well in doze — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Currently with 1.9.x and tk 8.5,the following occurs

12 messages 2010/05/22

[ruby-core:30262] Re: [Feature #3176] Thread#priority= should actually do something

From: Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...>
Date: 2010-05-16 01:42:09 UTC
List: ruby-core #30262
On 5/15/10, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
>> [[a slick little patch to just use setpriority]]
>>
>> And that works?!?
>
> Do you mean my test result is not enough?

No, I believe you. (Haven't been able to test it myself yet...
networking issues on my development laptop.) It's just that I was
astonished that it could be so easy.

It's a very nice little patch you made; thanks for doing it.

> MacOS X, Solaris, Windows have each different changing way.
> There isn't POSIX standard in this area unfortunatelly.
>
> Plus we already windows one, see
> thread_win32.c#native_thread_apply_priority().
>
> However, Some OS doesn't have per-thread priority feature at all. So,
> I don't think your patch is useless. My intention was, I hoped to clarify
> why you don't use setpriority() nor another os feature. your patch
> didn't describe it.

Ok, good. I think I should merge our patches together.

In This Thread