[ruby-core:24065] Re: 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release

> Perhaps you could post the various failures somewhere and core people
> could look at it to determine which are bugs?

If there's any interest, I'll gladly do that. My impression is that
they'd far prefer potential bugs reduced to trivial test cases and
filed as separate tickets.

> Are any of the failures related to the outstanding open bugs?

I would suspect they are. Likely the minority, however.

> Perhaps we could have a few saturdays dedicated as official bug scrubs
> for trunk where everyone unites to try to fix things.

Heh, I'll believe that when I see it. ;-)

> Oh I was going to mention re: 1.9.2 that ruby-prof does work on 1.9.1
> if you do an SVN co of its code, just so you're aware [there is a high
> speed profiler that works, I think].

Thanks. I don't forsee much need for a profiler. The difficult part is
establishing the general cause of a test failure then determining
whether said cause equates to intentional change of functionality or
an accidental defect. That's why I wanted discussion as to the best
way to pose my questions.

--
Run Paint Run Run