From: James Coglan <jcoglan@...>
Date: 2009-06-10T18:28:39+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:23784] Observable on Set?

--001636c598643c7e65046bfb195e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage
instead of a Set? Wouldn't a Set be faster, especially for removing
observers? Are there other places in the standard library where use of data
structures could be improved?

-- 
James Coglan
http://jcoglan.com

--001636c598643c7e65046bfb195e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage =
instead of a Set? Wouldn&#39;t a Set be faster, especially for removing obs=
ervers? Are there other places in the standard library where use of data st=
ructures could be improved?<br clear=3D"all">
<br>-- <br>James Coglan<br><a href=3D"http://jcoglan.com">http://jcoglan.co=
m</a><br>

--001636c598643c7e65046bfb195e--