[#24105] [Bug #1711] Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1711: Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures

9 messages 2009/07/01

[#24116] [Bug #1715] Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1715: Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions

10 messages 2009/07/02

[#24240] [Bug #1755] IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1755: IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8

8 messages 2009/07/09

[#24321] [Bug #1773] Gem path doesn't honor user gem? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Bug #1773: Gem path doesn't honor user gem?

12 messages 2009/07/14

[#24390] [Feature #1784] More encoding (Big5 series) support? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Feature #1784: More encoding (Big5 series) support?

12 messages 2009/07/16

[#24467] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello.

10 messages 2009/07/21

[#24472] [Feature #1800] rubygems can replace system executable files — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Feature #1800: rubygems can replace system executable files

13 messages 2009/07/21

[#24530] [Feature #1811] Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1811: Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true

9 messages 2009/07/23

[#24624] [Bug #1844] Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

15 messages 2009/07/30

[ruby-core:24170] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622

From: Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...>
Date: 2009-07-07 01:43:33 UTC
List: ruby-core #24170
It's possible adding an instruction-sequence method (iseq) into Proc would
suffice? Off of the instruction sequence, one could use the methods like
disasm or to_a.

The actual additional code (put in the right place) for this seems pretty
small:

VALUE
proc_iseq(VALUE self)
{
    rb_proc_t *proc;
    rb_iseq_t *iseq;
    VALUE rb_iseq;
    GetProcPtr(self, proc);
    iseq = proc->block.iseq;
    if (!iseq) return Qnil;
    rb_iseq = iseq_alloc_shared(rb_cISeq);
    RDATA(rb_iseq)->data = iseq;
    return rb_iseq;
}

 rb_define_method(rb_cProc, "iseq", proc_iseq, 0);

Warning: the above may have flaws in it.

I'll attach the above as a comment to redmine.


On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > === TODO
> > Some features need more discussions. We must decide detail of the
> > features by 25 Sep.
>
> Any chance of us gettting
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/578
> "add method to disassemble Proc objects"
>
> as well?
> That would be nice.
> Thanks.
> =r
>
>

In This Thread