ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#23657] [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1550: String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes

13 messages 2009/06/01
[#23662] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/01

Hi,
[#23663] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/01

On Jun 1, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#23664] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/01

Hi,
[#23671] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/02

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#23707] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/04

matz,
[#23714] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/05

Hi,
[#23665] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/01

I couldn't agree more! I'd find it most surprising if
[#23666] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/01

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#23672] [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/02

Issue #1550 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#23675] Re: [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Alex <imphasing@...> 2009/06/02

This change seems to break the build on my machine:
[#23681] Re: [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/03

Hi,
[#23689] Re: [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Alex <imphasing@...> 2009/06/03

[alex@platypus ruby]$ cat rbconfig.rb

[#23658] [Bug #1551] String#slice! Raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1551: String#slice! Raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes

2 messages 2009/06/01
[#23694] [Bug #1551](Closed) String#slice! Raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1551 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23659] [Bug #1552] String#strip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1552: String#strip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes

2 messages 2009/06/01
[#23695] [Bug #1552](Closed) String#strip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1552 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23660] [Bug #1553] String#index Ignores Out-of-Range Offset When Given Regexp Matching the Empty String — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1553: String#index Ignores Out-of-Range Offset When Given Regexp Matching the Empty String

2 messages 2009/06/01
[#24324] [Bug #1553](Closed) String#index Ignores Out-of-Range Offset When Given Regexp Matching the Empty String — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/07/14

Issue #1553 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23661] [Bug #1554] Enumerator#first & #take should consume only what is needed [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1554: Enumerator#first & #take should consume only what is needed [patch]

2 messages 2009/06/01
[#23680] [Bug #1554](Closed) Enumerator#first & #take should consume only what is needed [patch] — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1554 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23668] [Bug #1555] Inaccessible 'io' parameter in Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.initialize(x,y,io) — Howard Kapustein <redmine@...>

Bug #1555: Inaccessible 'io' parameter in Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.initialize(x,y,io)

1 message 2009/06/02

[#23670] [Bug #1557] Memory leak in DRb — Thibaut Neiger <redmine@...>

Bug #1557: Memory leak in DRb

3 messages 2009/06/02
[#23691] [Bug #1557] Memory leak in DRb — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1557 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23690] [Bug #1557] Memory leak in DRb — Thibaut Neiger <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1557 has been updated by Thibaut Neiger.

[#23674] [Bug #1558] test timeout issues in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1558: test timeout issues in windows

5 messages 2009/06/02
[#29552] [Bug #1558](Feedback) test timeout issues in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1558 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#30128] [Bug #1558] test timeout issues in windows — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/10

Issue #1558 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30131] [Bug #1558] test timeout issues in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/05/10

Issue #1558 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#30439] [Bug #1558](Closed) test timeout issues in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/26

Issue #1558 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23682] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — James Zhang <redmine@...>

Bug #1559: ERB single line comment does not work

6 messages 2009/06/03
[#23684] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1559 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.
[#24714] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — Johannes Fahrenkrug <redmine@...> 2009/08/03

Issue #1559 has been updated by Johannes Fahrenkrug.
[#24926] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — khaled alhabache <redmine@...> 2009/08/15

Issue #1559 has been updated by khaled alhabache.
[#29269] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — Robin Salkeld <redmine@...> 2010/04/06

Issue #1559 has been updated by Robin Salkeld.
[#29512] [Bug #1559](Rejected) ERB single line comment does not work — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #1559 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23683] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — David Cuadrado <redmine@...>

Bug #1560: multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression)

6 messages 2009/06/03
[#27872] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #1560 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#27955] Re: [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/29

Hi,
[#28675] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/03/15

Issue #1560 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#30219] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #1560 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30224] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #1560 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23685] [Backport #1562] r22674 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Backport #1562: r22674 should be backported to 1.8.6

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23686] [Bug #1563] Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Bug #1563: Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23687] [Backport #1563] Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Issue #1563 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23693] [Backport #1563](Closed) Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...>

Issue #1563 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23696] [Bug #1565] iconv self-destructed — Mark Eriksen <redmine@...>

Bug #1565: iconv self-destructed

2 messages 2009/06/03
[#23711] [Bug #1565] iconv self-destructed — Mark Eriksen <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1565 has been updated by Mark Eriksen.

[#23697] [Bug #1566] sprintf with %e or %E Format Specifer Incorrectly Capitalises Inf and NaN — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1566: sprintf with %e or %E Format Specifer Incorrectly Capitalises Inf and NaN

2 messages 2009/06/03
[#25462] [Bug #1566] sprintf with %e or %E Format Specifer Incorrectly Capitalises Inf and NaN — "m ." <redmine@...> 2009/09/07

Issue #1566 has been updated by m ..

[#23698] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #1567: socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures

5 messages 2009/06/03
[#23710] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1567 has been updated by Mike Pomraning.
[#27873] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #1567 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#29385] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1567 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30512] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #1567 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23699] Change in How $~ is Restored After String#sub/String#gsub with a ?Block — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

Hi,

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23700] Standard Ruby bytecode — Ioannis Nousias <s0238762@...>

I came across this post:

4 messages 2009/06/04
[#23701] Re: Standard Ruby bytecode — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/04

Excerpts from Ioannis Nousias's message of Thu Jun 04 12:11:06 +0300 2009:
[#23709] Re: Standard Ruby bytecode — Ioannis Nousias <s0238762@...> 2009/06/04

Eero and Rick,
[#23704] Re: Standard Ruby bytecode — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/06/04

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org> wrote:

[#23702] [Bug #1568] Revision 23639 build error OSX 10.5.7 — Mike Stok <redmine@...>

Bug #1568: Revision 23639 build error OSX 10.5.7

2 messages 2009/06/04
[#23708] [Bug #1568](Closed) Revision 23639 build error OSX 10.5.7 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/04

Issue #1568 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23703] [Bug #1569] gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Marc Paterno <redmine@...>

Bug #1569: gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault.

4 messages 2009/06/04
[#23705] Re: [Bug #1569] gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/04

gem update --system does seem to work with my p129
[#27877] [Bug #1569] gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #1569 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#29388] [Bug #1569](Feedback) gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1569 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23706] Inconsistent behavior on 1.8 and 1.9 of String#[]= with single Fixnum argument — brian ford <brixen@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2009/06/04
[#23712] Re: Inconsistent behavior on 1.8 and 1.9 of String#[]= with single Fixnum argument — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/05

That's a tricky question!

[#23713] [Bug]Is this a bug about thread_reset_event_flags? — "Tetsu Soh" <tetsu.soh.dev@...>

Hello,

1 message 2009/06/05

[#23715] [Bug #1571] Hash Methods Behaving Inconsistently with Frozen Hashes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1571: Hash Methods Behaving Inconsistently with Frozen Hashes

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#23751] [Bug #1571](Closed) Hash Methods Behaving Inconsistently with Frozen Hashes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/08

Issue #1571 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23716] [Bug #1572] Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching — Thomas Martitz <redmine@...>

Bug #1572: Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching

3 messages 2009/06/05
[#23719] [Bug #1572](Rejected) Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1572 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#23731] Re: [Bug #1572] Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,

[#23717] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Morris Brodersen <redmine@...>

Bug #1573: $0 behaves unexpectedly

7 messages 2009/06/05
[#23718] Re: [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/05

Excerpts from Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca's message of Fri Jun 05 19:07:18 +0300 2009:
[#23720] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Morris Brodersen <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1573 has been updated by Morris Brodersen.
[#29403] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/10

Issue #1573 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29482] Re: [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/12

Hi,
[#30584] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/06/04

Issue #1573 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30591] [Bug #1573][Closed] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/06/05

Issue #1573 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23721] [Bug #1574] test_systemcallerror_eq(TestDelegateClass) on windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1574: test_systemcallerror_eq(TestDelegateClass) on windows

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#29781] [Bug #1574](Closed) test_systemcallerror_eq(TestDelegateClass) on windows — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/04/24

Issue #1574 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#23722] [Bug #1575] TestEtc failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1575: TestEtc failures in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#30011] [Bug #1575](Closed) TestEtc failures in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/05/05

Issue #1575 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23723] [Bug #1576] TestFile failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1576: TestFile failures in windows

4 messages 2009/06/05
[#30174] [Bug #1576](Assigned) TestFile failures in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/12

Issue #1576 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#30204] [Bug #1576](Closed) TestFile failures in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #1576 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#30188] [Bug #1576] TestFile failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/05/12

Issue #1576 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23724] [Bug #1577] testFileUtils failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1577: testFileUtils failure in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#29995] [Bug #1577](Closed) testFileUtils failure in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/05/04

Issue #1577 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23725] [Bug #1578] TestFloat failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1578: TestFloat failure in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#29547] [Bug #1578](Closed) TestFloat failure in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1578 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23726] [Bug #1579] TestGDBM failure in mingw — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1579: TestGDBM failure in mingw

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#29551] [Bug #1579](Third Party's Issue) TestGDBM failure in mingw — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1579 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23727] [Bug #1580] TestIOScanF failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1580: TestIOScanF failure in windows

4 messages 2009/06/05
[#23734] Re: [Bug #1580] TestIOScanF failure in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,
[#23810] [Bug #1580](Closed) TestIOScanF failure in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1580 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23826] Re: [Bug #1580](Closed) TestIOScanF failure in windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> Issue #1580 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23728] [Bug #1581] Test_IO17M failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1581: Test_IO17M failure in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#29548] [Bug #1581] Test_IO17M failure in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1581 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23729] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1583: Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError?

14 messages 2009/06/05
[#27283] [Bug #1583](Closed) Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/12/22

Issue #1583 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#23816] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#23733] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,
[#23735] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,
[#23743] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#23744] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — daz <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2009/06/07

Akira Tanaka wrote:
[#23746] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/07

Hi,
[#23748] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/07

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Sun Jun 07 17:07:06 +0300 2009:
[#23752] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...> 2009/06/08

On 2009/06/08 0:27, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#23756] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/08

I'd like to second long explicit names. Maybe it's because I'm not
[#23747] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#24043] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#26995] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/12/02

Issue #1583 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23730] SVN for committers seems to be down — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

$ svn info

1 message 2009/06/05

[#23732] Fwd: ruby_frame in 1.8 is what in 1.9? — Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@...>

So I have some C++ extension code that nicely uses ruby_frame->orig_func and

1 message 2009/06/06

[#23736] [Bug #1584] return from lambda within 2 procs freezes — Glen Gerstman <redmine@...>

Bug #1584: return from lambda within 2 procs freezes

3 messages 2009/06/06
[#29390] [Bug #1584](Closed) return from lambda within 2 procs freezes — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1584 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#23855] [Bug #1584] return from lambda within 2 procs freezes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1584 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#23737] [Bug #1585] general auto string literal concatenation — Glen Gerstman <redmine@...>

Bug #1585: general auto string literal concatenation

2 messages 2009/06/06
[#28989] [Feature #1585] general auto string literal concatenation — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1585 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23738] Ducktyping interface — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

Matz,

6 messages 2009/06/07
[#23739] Re: Ducktyping interface — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/06/07

I should add that further examination reveals that people who make proxy
[#23788] Re: Ducktyping interface — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/06/10

Hi,
[#23745] Re: Ducktyping interface — Stephen Sykes <sdsykes@...> 2009/06/07

I would hope that it's a spec.
[#23789] Re: Ducktyping interface — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/06/10

Hi,
[#23758] Re: Ducktyping interface — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/06/08

Hi,

[#23740] [Bug #1586] Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...>

Bug #1586: Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored

3 messages 2009/06/07
[#23741] [Feature #1586] Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored — Rick DeNatale <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1586 has been updated by Rick DeNatale.
[#23742] [Feature #1586] Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1586 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.

[#23749] idLAST_TOKEN definition in '.../template/id.h.tmpl' — "daz (c)" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>

I can't see idLAST_TOKEN in use anywhere in the source distribution

2 messages 2009/06/07
[#23750] Re: idLAST_TOKEN definition in '.../template/id.h.tmpl' — "daz (c)" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2009/06/07

or, strictly ...

[#23753] [Bug #1587] Problem with string sharing — Quet Zal <redmine@...>

Bug #1587: Problem with string sharing

4 messages 2009/06/08
[#23754] Re: [Bug #1587] Problem with string sharing — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/08

Excerpts from redmine message on Mon Jun 08 15:07:21 +0300 2009:
[#23755] Re: [Bug #1587] Problem with string sharing — Quet Zal <i.am.quetz@...> 2009/06/08

Here's even more simplified example how to reproduce this bug. (First one
[#29973] [Bug #1587](Closed) Problem with string sharing — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #1587 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#23757] [Backport #1589] Backport BigDecimal fixes — Kirk Haines <redmine@...>

Backport #1589: Backport BigDecimal fixes

2 messages 2009/06/08
[#23786] [Backport #1589](Closed) Backport BigDecimal fixes — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2009/06/10

Issue #1589 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#23759] [Bug #1590] Unexpected behaviour of Array.| — Jens Kanschik <redmine@...>

Bug #1590: Unexpected behaviour of Array.|

1 message 2009/06/08

[#23766] [Bug #1591] DATA handle unusable in required modules — Chris Davaz <redmine@...>

Bug #1591: DATA handle unusable in required modules

1 message 2009/06/09

[#23767] [Bug #1592] [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue — Joseph Pecoraro <redmine@...>

Bug #1592: [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue

3 messages 2009/06/09
[#24038] [Bug #1592] [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue — Joseph Pecoraro <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1592 has been updated by Joseph Pecoraro.
[#24039] [Bug #1592](Closed) [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1592 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23768] [Bug #1593] Exception backtrace within eval lacks topmost function — Chris Howlett <redmine@...>

Bug #1593: Exception backtrace within eval lacks topmost function

1 message 2009/06/09

[#23769] [Bug #1594] Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows — Barry DeZonia <redmine@...>

Bug #1594: Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows

3 messages 2009/06/09
[#23771] [Bug #1594] Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows — Barry DeZonia <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1594 has been updated by Barry DeZonia.
[#23774] [Bug #1594] Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1594 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23770] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Robert Gonzalez <redmine@...>

Bug #1595: rake unusable on windows install

10 messages 2009/06/09
[#23772] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1595 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23773] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2009/06/09

SGF2ZSB5b3UgY2hlY2tlZCB0aGUgY21kIGZpbGU/IEl0IG1pZ2h0IGJlIHBvaW50aW5nIHRvIGFu
[#23775] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2009/06/09

UGxlYXNlIGRpc3JlZ2FyZCB0aGlzLCBJIGRpZG4ndCByZWFkIHRoZSBvcmlnaW5hbCB2ZXJ5IHdl
[#23776] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/09

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Robert Gonzalez<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrot=
[#23779] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Robert Gonzalez <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1595 has been updated by Robert Gonzalez.
[#23782] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2009/06/10

[#23780] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Robert Gonzalez <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1595 has been updated by Robert Gonzalez.
[#24436] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Pat Parslow <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1595 has been updated by Pat Parslow.
[#24438] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/18

On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Pat Parslow<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#23781] [HEADSUP] RubyGems 1.3.4 in trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

I have updated RubyGems to 1.3.4 r2223

2 messages 2009/06/09
[#23823] Re: [HEADSUP] RubyGems 1.3.4 in trunk — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Eric Hodel<drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#23784] Observable on Set? — James Coglan <jcoglan@...>

Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage

2 messages 2009/06/10
[#23785] Re: Observable on Set? — James Coglan <jcoglan@...> 2009/06/10

2009/6/10 James Coglan <jcoglan@googlemail.com>

[#23793] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — okkez _ <redmine@...>

Feature #1599: ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message

6 messages 2009/06/11
[#23794] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1599 has been updated by Lin Jen-Shin.
[#23795] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1599 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23814] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1599 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#28854] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/22

Issue #1599 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29077] Re: [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/03/28

[#23796] [Bug #1602] TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1602: TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole)

3 messages 2009/06/11
[#29550] [Bug #1602](Assigned) TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1602 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#29563] [Bug #1602](Closed) TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole) — Masaki Suketa <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1602 has been updated by Masaki Suketa.

[#23797] [Bug #1603] TestOpen3 failure (windows) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1603: TestOpen3 failure (windows)

3 messages 2009/06/11
[#29878] [Bug #1603] TestOpen3 failure (windows) — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/04/29

Issue #1603 has been updated by _ wanabe.
[#29879] [Bug #1603](Closed) TestOpen3 failure (windows) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/29

Issue #1603 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23798] [Bug #1604] TestPath failure (mingw) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1604: TestPath failure (mingw)

2 messages 2009/06/11
[#29549] [Bug #1604](Closed) TestPath failure (mingw) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1604 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23799] [Bug #1605] TestProcess failure — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1605: TestProcess failure

2 messages 2009/06/11
[#30272] [Bug #1605](Closed) TestProcess failure — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/17

Issue #1605 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23800] [Bug #1606] TestRequire failure — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1606: TestRequire failure

3 messages 2009/06/11
[#24944] [Bug #1606] TestRequire failure — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/08/17

Issue #1606 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#26849] [Bug #1606](Rejected) TestRequire failure — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1606 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23801] [Bug #1607] TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1607: TestSocket failures

4 messages 2009/06/11
[#24384] [Bug #1607] TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1607 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23803] [Bug #1607] TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1607 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#26846] [Bug #1607](Closed) TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1607 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23802] [Bug #1608] einval in getsockname (windows) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1608: einval in getsockname (windows)

3 messages 2009/06/11
[#24414] [Bug #1608] einval in getsockname (windows) — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1608 has been updated by Heesob Park.
[#24423] [Bug #1608](Closed) einval in getsockname (windows) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1608 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23804] [Bug #1609] inetv6 failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1609: inetv6 failures in windows

3 messages 2009/06/11
[#23819] Re: [Bug #1609] inetv6 failures in windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> 117) Error:
[#26847] [Bug #1609](Closed) inetv6 failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1609 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23805] [Bug #1610] BasicSocket errors (doze) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1610: BasicSocket errors (doze)

2 messages 2009/06/11
[#26848] [Bug #1610] BasicSocket errors (doze) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1610 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23806] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1611: win32ole errors from make test all

5 messages 2009/06/11
[#24385] [Bug #1611](Closed) win32ole errors from make test all — Masaki Suketa <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1611 has been updated by Masaki Suketa.
[#24386] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Masaki Suketa <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1611 has been updated by Masaki Suketa.
[#23809] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1611 has been updated by Heesob Park.
[#24366] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1611 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23807] suggestion for string concatenation [RCR] — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Currently with Ruby if you want to concatenate objects to a string,

2 messages 2009/06/11
[#23808] Re: suggestion for string concatenation [RCR] — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/11

Hi,

[#23813] [Bug #1613] Segfault due to stack overflow — Robert Dober <redmine@...>

Bug #1613: Segfault due to stack overflow

4 messages 2009/06/12
[#23958] [Bug #1613](Closed) Segfault due to stack overflow — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1613 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#23890] Re: [Bug #1613] Segfault due to stack overflow — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/17

Hi,
[#23817] Re: [Bug #1613] Segfault due to stack overflow — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> When using a closure or param to cache values for recursive calls, the stack overflow is not caught but segfaults.

[#23815] inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...>

Hello,

9 messages 2009/06/12
[#23818] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> This works on Linux by persisting socket.fileno from the parent process a=
[#23820] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Knutaf H <knutaf@...> 2009/06/12

Well, I'm already not exactly using pure Ruby, since I'm wrapping
[#23822] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> Besides that, I think using WSADuplicateSocket will suffer from the
[#23837] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...> 2009/06/13

I tried that with both the HANDLE value and with an fd value that I
[#23838] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/13

> I tried that with both the HANDLE value and with an fd value that I
[#23841] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...> 2009/06/13

I don't think I gave enough context...
[#23871] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...> 2009/06/16

Any other data I should present?
[#23874] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/16

> Any other data I should present?

[#23821] [Bug #1616] Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError — Michael Fellinger <redmine@...>

Bug #1616: Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError

3 messages 2009/06/12
[#23825] Re: [Bug #1616] Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> =A0 =A0# Another name for Timeout::Error, defined for backwards compatibi=
[#23830] [Bug #1616](Closed) Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1616 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23824] [Bug #1617] Exception Raised by Uncaught Throw (Disagreement Between Documentation and Reality) — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1617: Exception Raised by Uncaught Throw (Disagreement Between Documentation and Reality)

2 messages 2009/06/12
[#23829] [Bug #1617](Closed) Exception Raised by Uncaught Throw (Disagreement Between Documentation and Reality) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1617 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23827] [Bug #1618] Kernel.catch without Arguments — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1618: Kernel.catch without Arguments

2 messages 2009/06/12
[#23831] [Bug #1618](Closed) Kernel.catch without Arguments — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1618 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23828] [Bug #1619] [PATCH] Kernel.local_variables Documentation: Symbols are Returned on 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1619: [PATCH] Kernel.local_variables Documentation: Symbols are Returned on 1.9

2 messages 2009/06/12
[#23832] [Bug #1619](Closed) [PATCH] Kernel.local_variables Documentation: Symbols are Returned on 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1619 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23833] [Bug #1620] [PATCH] Kernel.require Normalises Paths in 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1620: [PATCH] Kernel.require Normalises Paths in 1.9

2 messages 2009/06/13
[#23895] [Bug #1620](Closed) [PATCH] Kernel.require Normalises Paths in 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1620 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23834] [Bug #1621] autoload Doesn't Call #to_path on non-String Argument — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1621: autoload Doesn't Call #to_path on non-String Argument

2 messages 2009/06/13
[#23836] [Bug #1621](Closed) autoload Doesn't Call #to_path on non-String Argument — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/13

Issue #1621 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23835] [Bug #1622] [PATCH] Module.autoload Documentation Fix — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1622: [PATCH] Module.autoload Documentation Fix

2 messages 2009/06/13
[#23894] [Bug #1622](Closed) [PATCH] Module.autoload Documentation Fix — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1622 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23839] [Bug #1624] [PATCH] Documentation for File#size — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1624: [PATCH] Documentation for File#size

2 messages 2009/06/13
[#23846] [Bug #1624](Closed) [PATCH] Documentation for File#size — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1624 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23840] [Bug #1625] Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1625: Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option

3 messages 2009/06/13
[#29329] [Bug #1625](Feedback) Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1625 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30510] [Bug #1625][Closed] Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #1625 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23842] request for updated ri/rdoc on 1.8.7 branch — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

would it be possible to get a newer version of ri/rdoc installed on

3 messages 2009/06/13
[#23865] Re: request for updated ri/rdoc on 1.8.7 branch — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2009/06/15

On Jun 13, 2009, at 13:27, Roger Pack wrote:
[#24291] Re: request for updated ri/rdoc on 1.8.7 branch — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/12

>> would it be possible to get a newer version of ri/rdoc installed on

[#23843] Differences in Rational Between 1.8 and 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

I'm writing RubySpec specifications for Rational in 1.9. Enumerated

3 messages 2009/06/13
[#23856] Re: Differences in Rational Between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/14

Hi,
[#23857] Re: Differences in Rational Between 1.8 and 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/15

> All of above are intentional. =C2=A0No need to file bug. =C2=A0Most of th=

[#23844] [Bug #1626] Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1626: Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments

3 messages 2009/06/13
[#27220] [Bug #1626](Closed) Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/12/19

Issue #1626 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#27221] [Bug #1626] Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/12/19

Issue #1626 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23845] [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1627: Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths

5 messages 2009/06/13
[#23847] [Bug #1627](Closed) Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1627 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23848] [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1627 has been updated by Heesob Park.
[#23896] Re: [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/17

Hi,
[#23897] Re: [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/17

Hi,

[#23849] [Bug #1629] [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Markus Fischer <redmine@...>

Bug #1629: [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults

4 messages 2009/06/14
[#23861] Re: [Bug #1629] [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/15

> C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\mfischer>irb
[#23862] Re: [Bug #1629] [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2009/06/15

2009/6/15 Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com>:
[#29330] [Bug #1629](Rejected) [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1629 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23850] instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — apeiros <apeiros@...>

Hi folks

10 messages 2009/06/14
[#23877] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2009/06/16

Hi,
[#23879] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — apeiros <apeiros@...> 2009/06/16

Am 16.06.2009 um 22:12 schrieb Yusuke ENDOH:
[#23880] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Florian Gilcher <flo@...> 2009/06/16

[#23904] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — apeiros <apeiros@...> 2009/06/17

Am 17.06.2009 um 00:01 schrieb Florian Gilcher:
[#23905] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Florian Gilcher <flo@...> 2009/06/17

[#24334] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/15

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Florian Gilcher<flo@andersground.net> wrote:
[#24524] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/23

> I for one would support instance_exec getting backported to Ruby.
[#23866] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/06/16

[#23870] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/16

Hi,

[#23851] [Bug #1631] Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1631: Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable

3 messages 2009/06/14
[#29331] [Bug #1631] Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1631 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30509] [Bug #1631][Closed] Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #1631 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23852] [Bug #1632] ARGF's Iterators Return nill Instead of self — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1632: ARGF's Iterators Return nill Instead of self

2 messages 2009/06/14
[#23860] [Bug #1632](Closed) ARGF's Iterators Return nill Instead of self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/15

Issue #1632 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23853] [Bug #1633] ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1633: ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9

4 messages 2009/06/14
[#23867] [Bug #1633](Closed) ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/16

Issue #1633 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#23868] Re: [Bug #1633] ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/16

Hi,
[#24591] [Backport #1633](Assigned) ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/07/29

Issue #1633 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23854] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1635: ARGF Has No Documentation

7 messages 2009/06/14
[#24049] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1635 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#23891] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1635 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#23858] Re: [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/15

Hi,
[#24656] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/08/01

Issue #1635 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#25430] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/09/05

Issue #1635 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#25433] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Nobuhiro IMAI <redmine@...> 2009/09/06

Issue #1635 has been updated by Nobuhiro IMAI.

[#23859] [Bug #1636] Rational#coerce(Rational) Raises TypeError — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1636: Rational#coerce(Rational) Raises TypeError

2 messages 2009/06/15
[#23884] [Bug #1636](Closed) Rational#coerce(Rational) Raises TypeError — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/16

Issue #1636 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.

[#23864] [Bug #1639] YAML.load fails on some Regexps — viktor tron <redmine@...>

Bug #1639: YAML.load fails on some Regexps

1 message 2009/06/15

[#23869] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1640: [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class

12 messages 2009/06/16
[#23921] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#23922] Re: [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/19

> ok, i understand.
[#23923] Re: [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2009/06/19

On Jun 18, 2009, at 17:42, Run Paint Run Run wrote:
[#23899] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#23901] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1640 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#23906] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#23909] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/18

Issue #1640 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#23916] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/18

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#23920] Re: [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/18

> i'm not good at english.
[#23927] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#24442] [Bug #1640](Closed) [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/07/19

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.

[#23872] [Bug #1641] File::SEPARATOR not platform-specific — 戈 吕 <redmine@...>

Bug #1641: File::SEPARATOR not platform-specific

2 messages 2009/06/16
[#23873] [Bug #1641](Rejected) File::SEPARATOR not platform-specific — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/16

Issue #1641 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23875] [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Issue #1392 has been updated by Roger Pack.

1 message 2009/06/16

[#23876] [Bug #1643] documentation are installed to the wrong dir in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1643: documentation are installed to the wrong dir in windows

3 messages 2009/06/16
[#23900] [Bug #1643] documentation are installed to the wrong dir in windows — Yutaka Kanemoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1643 has been updated by Yutaka Kanemoto.
[#23902] [Bug #1643](Closed) documentation are installed to the wrong dir in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1643 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23878] trouble registering and logging in to the issue tracking system — Knutaf H <knutaf@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2009/06/16
[#23882] Re: trouble registering and logging in to the issue tracking system — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/16

> Any ideas what might be wrong?
[#23885] Re: trouble registering and logging in to the issue tracking system — Knutaf H <knutaf@...> 2009/06/16

Opera and multiple versions of IE give exactly the same result:
[#23886] Re: trouble registering and logging in to the issue tracking system — Tommy Nordgren <tommy.nordgren@...> 2009/06/16

[#23892] Re: trouble registering and logging in to the issue tracking system — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...> 2009/06/17

I am brilliant and typoed my username, not password. Hooray for me now being

[#23883] Merging recent Ruby threading improvements — Joe Damato <ice799@...>

Hi ruby-core and CC'ed friends -

5 messages 2009/06/16
[#23888] Re: Merging recent Ruby threading improvements — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/17

Hi,
[#23889] Re: Merging recent Ruby threading improvements — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/06/17

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#23887] Re: Merging recent Ruby threading improvements — Brian Mitchell <binary42@...> 2009/06/17

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 19:20, Joe Damato<ice799@gmail.com> wrote:
[#23898] Re: Merging recent Ruby threading improvements — Kirk Haines <wyhaines@...> 2009/06/17

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Joe Damato<ice799@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23893] [Bug #1644] recv on inherited socket wrapped in TCPSocket does not read data, on Windows — Kedar H <redmine@...>

Bug #1644: recv on inherited socket wrapped in TCPSocket does not read data, on Windows

2 messages 2009/06/17
[#24531] [Feature #1644] recv on inherited socket wrapped in TCPSocket does not read data, on Windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/23

Issue #1644 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23903] [Bug #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1648: Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument

9 messages 2009/06/17
[#25168] [Bug #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — David Calavera <redmine@...> 2009/08/27

Issue #1648 has been updated by David Calavera.
[#25169] [Bug #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Rick DeNatale <redmine@...> 2009/08/27

Issue #1648 has been updated by Rick DeNatale.
[#25171] [Bug #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/08/27

Issue #1648 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#25172] [Bug #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — David Calavera <redmine@...> 2009/08/28

Issue #1648 has been updated by David Calavera.
[#25753] [Bug #1648](Closed) Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/24

Issue #1648 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26796] [Backport #1648](Assigned) Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/11/18

Issue #1648 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#26823] [Backport #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/11/19

Issue #1648 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#26811] [Backport #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/11/18

Issue #1648 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23907] [Bug #1649] use of #send in MonitorMixin::extend_object fails for BasicSocket objects — Young Hyun <redmine@...>

Bug #1649: use of #send in MonitorMixin::extend_object fails for BasicSocket objects

2 messages 2009/06/18
[#23941] [Bug #1649](Closed) use of #send in MonitorMixin::extend_object fails for BasicSocket objects — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1649 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23908] [Bug #1650] Time range === is slow — Dmitry Bilunov <redmine@...>

Bug #1650: Time range === is slow

4 messages 2009/06/18
[#23919] [Bug #1650] Time range === is slow — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2009/06/18

Issue #1650 has been updated by Eric Hodel.
[#23935] Re: [Bug #1650] Time range === is slow — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/19

Hi,
[#33972] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#1650] Time range === is slow — Christopher Dunn <redmine@...> 2010/12/28

Issue #1650 has been updated by Christopher Dunn.

[#23910] [Bug #1651] Segfault for #numerator and #denominator on Numeric Subclass — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1651: Segfault for #numerator and #denominator on Numeric Subclass

2 messages 2009/06/18
[#23915] [Bug #1651](Closed) Segfault for #numerator and #denominator on Numeric Subclass — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/18

Issue #1651 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.

[#23911] [Bug #1652] pathname issues warning — Robert Dober <redmine@...>

Bug #1652: pathname issues warning

2 messages 2009/06/18
[#23940] [Bug #1652](Closed) pathname issues warning — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1652 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23912] [Bug #1653] YAML load_documents fails on specification example without newline at end — Benjamin ter Kuile <redmine@...>

Bug #1653: YAML load_documents fails on specification example without newline at end

1 message 2009/06/18

[#23913] Broken finalizers in ruby 1.8 — Stanislav Sedov <stas@...>

Hi!

3 messages 2009/06/18
[#23918] Re: Broken finalizers in ruby 1.8 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/18

Hi,
[#23928] Re: Broken finalizers in ruby 1.8 — Stanislav Sedov <stas@...> 2009/06/19

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:33:44 +0900

[#23914] [Bug #1654] Segmentation fault after a "make install" under OpenSolaris 2009.06 — Pedro Saraiva <redmine@...>

Bug #1654: Segmentation fault after a "make install" under OpenSolaris 2009.06

4 messages 2009/06/18
[#24312] [Bug #1654] Segmentation fault after a "make install" under OpenSolaris 2009.06 — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1654 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#24408] [Bug #1654] Segmentation fault after a "make install" under OpenSolaris 2009.06 — Pedro Saraiva <redmine@...> 2009/07/17

Issue #1654 has been updated by Pedro Saraiva.
[#25024] [Bug #1654] Segmentation fault after a "make install" under OpenSolaris 2009.06 — Pedro Saraiva <redmine@...> 2009/08/21

Issue #1654 has been updated by Pedro Saraiva.

[#23917] ruby 1.8/1.9 URI merge call for FTP uris is broken. — Stanislav Sedov <stas@...>

Hi!

1 message 2009/06/18

[#23925] [Bug #1657] Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version — karim rayani <redmine@...>

Bug #1657: Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version

5 messages 2009/06/19
[#23937] Re: [Bug #1657] Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/19

> on Windows XP when performing =A0>> gem install db2
[#23930] [Bug #1657] Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1657 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#23963] [Bug #1657] Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version — karim rayani <redmine@...> 2009/06/22

Issue #1657 has been updated by karim rayani.
[#23964] [Bug #1657] Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version — karim rayani <redmine@...> 2009/06/22

Issue #1657 has been updated by karim rayani.

[#23926] [Bug #1658] Encoding.name_list Returns Dummy Encodings Contrary to Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1658: Encoding.name_list Returns Dummy Encodings Contrary to Documentation

3 messages 2009/06/19
[#23929] Re: [Bug #1658] Encoding.name_list Returns Dummy Encodings Contrary to Documentation — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/19

Hi,
[#23931] [Bug #1658](Closed) Encoding.name_list Returns Dummy Encodings Contrary to Documentation — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1658 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23932] [Bug #1659] Segfault with Encoding::Converter.asciicompat_encoding('internal') — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1659: Segfault with Encoding::Converter.asciicompat_encoding('internal')

2 messages 2009/06/19
[#23953] [Bug #1659](Closed) Segfault with Encoding::Converter.asciicompat_encoding('internal') — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1659 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23933] Stack size detection algorithm — Stanislav Sedov <stas@...>

Hi!

1 message 2009/06/19

[#23934] [Bug #1661] RegExp mismatch — Adam Carheden <redmine@...>

Bug #1661: RegExp mismatch

6 messages 2009/06/19
[#23936] [Bug #1661](Assigned) RegExp mismatch — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1661 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#23939] [Bug #1661](Rejected) RegExp mismatch — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1661 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23942] Re: [Bug #1661](Rejected) RegExp mismatch — Hirotsugu Asari <asari.ruby@...> 2009/06/20

[#23951] Re: [Bug #1661](Rejected) RegExp mismatch — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/21

Hi,
[#23954] Re: [Bug #1661](Rejected) RegExp mismatch — Hirotsugu Asari <asari.ruby@...> 2009/06/21

[#23938] [Bug #1662] 1.8.6 + windows + udp socket + ctrl +c -> hang — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1662: 1.8.6 + windows + udp socket + ctrl +c -> hang

3 messages 2009/06/19
[#23967] [Bug #1662] 1.8.6 + windows + udp socket + ctrl +c -> hang — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/22

Issue #1662 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#26844] [Bug #1662](Rejected) 1.8.6 + windows + udp socket + ctrl +c -> hang — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1662 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23943] [Bug #1663] Small documentation fixes [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1663: Small documentation fixes [patch]

2 messages 2009/06/20
[#24109] [Bug #1663](Closed) Small documentation fixes [patch] — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/07/01

Issue #1663 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23944] [Bug #1664] Kernel#define_singleton_method not documented [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1664: Kernel#define_singleton_method not documented [patch]

3 messages 2009/06/20
[#24313] [Bug #1664](Closed) Kernel#define_singleton_method not documented [patch] — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1664 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#24345] Re: [Bug #1664] Kernel#define_singleton_method not documented [patch] — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...> 2009/07/15

Thank you. The patch was applied except the last sentence.

[#23945] [Bug #1665] Enumerable#reverse_each, #entries, #to_a documentation [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1665: Enumerable#reverse_each, #entries, #to_a documentation [patch]

2 messages 2009/06/20
[#23947] [Bug #1665] Enumerable#reverse_each, #entries, #to_a documentation [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/06/20

Issue #1665 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23946] [Bug #1385] Wonderful undocumented feature in Ruby 1.8.7 & 1.9 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Issue #1385 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

1 message 2009/06/20

[#23948] [Bug #1666] Confusion in documentation for lines vs each_line, etc... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1666: Confusion in documentation for lines vs each_line, etc...

4 messages 2009/06/20
[#28416] [Bug #1666] Confusion in documentation for lines vs each_line, etc... — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/02

Issue #1666 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#28417] [Bug #1666](Closed) Confusion in documentation for lines vs each_line, etc... — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/02

Issue #1666 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#28569] [Bug #1666] Confusion in documentation for lines vs each_line, etc... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2010/03/09

Issue #1666 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23949] [Feature #1667] IO#codepoints, IO#each_codepoint, and StringIO — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #1667: IO#codepoints, IO#each_codepoint, and StringIO

2 messages 2009/06/20
[#23965] [Feature #1667](Closed) IO#codepoints, IO#each_codepoint, and StringIO — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/22

Issue #1667 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23950] [Bug #1668] Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista — Kristian Mandrup <redmine@...>

Bug #1668: Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista

4 messages 2009/06/20
[#23959] [Bug #1668] Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista — Kristian Mandrup <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1668 has been updated by Kristian Mandrup.
[#23961] Re: [Bug #1668] Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/21

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Kristian Mandrup<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#26110] [Bug #1668](Closed) Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/10/16

Issue #1668 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23952] [Bug #1669] FileUtils.cp file mode — Alex Dircksen <redmine@...>

Bug #1669: FileUtils.cp file mode

2 messages 2009/06/21
[#23955] [Bug #1669](Closed) FileUtils.cp file mode — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1669 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23962] Why are rb_hash_xxx symbols static to hash.c? — brian ford <brixen@...>

Hi Matz,

1 message 2009/06/22

[#23966] request for officially sanctioned tutorial/howto location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Current situation:

1 message 2009/06/22

[#23968] [Bug #1677] memory leak in DBD-mysql — Qi Lu <redmine@...>

Bug #1677: memory leak in DBD-mysql

3 messages 2009/06/22
[#23969] Re: [Bug #1677] memory leak in DBD-mysql — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2009/06/22

2009/6/22 Qi Lu <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#23970] Re: [Bug #1677] memory leak in DBD-mysql — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/22

Hi,

[#23971] [Bug #1678] uninitialized value in ossl_x509store_initialize causes occasional segfault — Peter Pawlowski <redmine@...>

Bug #1678: uninitialized value in ossl_x509store_initialize causes occasional segfault

3 messages 2009/06/22
[#23972] [Bug #1678] uninitialized value in ossl_x509store_initialize causes occasional segfault — Peter Pawlowski <redmine@...> 2009/06/22

Issue #1678 has been updated by Peter Pawlowski.
[#29035] [Bug #1678](Closed) uninitialized value in ossl_x509store_initialize causes occasional segfault — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/26

Issue #1678 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23974] REXML pretty.rb — Ed Gamble <ed.gamble@...>

[Sorry if this is the wrong forum; please forward to the proper person/

1 message 2009/06/23

[#23976] Ruby Installer - One-Click contest voting is now open! — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

I'm glad to inform that voting for One-Click Ruby Installer website

2 messages 2009/06/23
[#23982] Re: Ruby Installer - One-Click contest voting is now open! — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/06/23

2009/6/23 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:

[#23977] [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2009/06/23
[#23978] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/23

Good!
[#23979] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/23

Thanks for the update. :-)
[#24009] Re: Encoding of ENV (Was: Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2009/06/24

On Jun 23, 2009, at 02:23, Run Paint Run Run wrote:
[#24047] Re: Encoding of ENV (Was: Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622) — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/26

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Eric Hodel<drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#24048] Re: Encoding of ENV (Was: Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622) — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/26

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Eric Hodel<drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#23984] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/23

On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:23 AM, Run Paint Run Run wrote:
[#23985] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2009/06/23

> There's a far superior SQLite interface for Ruby called Amalgalite:
[#23993] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2009/06/23

James Gray wrote:
[#23996] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...> 2009/06/23

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Joel VanderWerf<vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
[#23998] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/23

On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:19 PM, Jeremy Kemper wrote:
[#24016] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/24

> It's a kind of amalgamation of boolean flip-flops and
[#24173] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/07

Sorry for late response,
[#24174] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/07

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:12 AM, NARUSE, Yui<naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#24242] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/09

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luis Lavena<luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#24250] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Jörg W Mittag <joergwmittag@...> 2009/07/10

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#24261] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/11

I agree pretty much across the board. I was actually hoping that
[#24264] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#24265] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — James Gray <james@...> 2009/07/11

On Jul 11, 2009, at 3:06 PM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#24267] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2009/07/11

James Gray wrote:
[#24294] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/12

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#24269] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

James Gray wrote:
[#24276] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — James Gray <james@...> 2009/07/11

On Jul 11, 2009, at 5:28 PM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#24266] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/11

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 5:06 PM, NARUSE, Yui<naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#24273] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

J旦rg W Mittag wrote:
[#24262] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

Luis Lavena wrote:
[#24175] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — James Gray <james@...> 2009/07/07

On Jul 6, 2009, at 10:12 PM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#24268] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

James Gray wrote:
[#23995] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...> 2009/06/23

2009/6/23 Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp>
[#24040] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/25

Hi,
[#24041] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/06/25

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto<matz@ruby-lang.org> wro=
[#24042] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/26

Hi,
[#24000] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "Muhammad A. Ali" <oldmoe@...> 2009/06/24

Good work
[#24106] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/01

2009/6/23 Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp>:
[#24107] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/01

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Charles Oliver
[#24108] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/01

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Luis Lavena<luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#24274] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#24168] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/06

>
[#24170] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...> 2009/07/07

It's possible adding an instruction-sequence method (iseq) into Proc would
[#24246] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/10

> I hope to include the following features into the 1.9.2. But they might
[#24260] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/11

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23983] [Bug #1679] rb_w32_getenv() invalidates previous environment pointers — Jarek Jurasz <redmine@...>

Bug #1679: rb_w32_getenv() invalidates previous environment pointers

3 messages 2009/06/23
[#25822] [Bug #1679] rb_w32_getenv() invalidates previous environment pointers — Jarek Jurasz <redmine@...> 2009/09/28

Issue #1679 has been updated by Jarek Jurasz.
[#25823] [Bug #1679] rb_w32_getenv() invalidates previous environment pointers — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/09/28

Issue #1679 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23986] possible bug with windows `` they don't set $? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Looks like a bug? [1.8 or 1.9]

4 messages 2009/06/23
[#23987] Re: possible bug with windows `` they don't set $? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/23

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
[#23991] Re: possible bug with windows `` they don't set $? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/23

> Hello Roger,
[#23992] Re: possible bug with windows `` they don't set $? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/23

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23988] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Xuân Baldauf <redmine@...>

Bug #1680: URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default)

7 messages 2009/06/23
[#23990] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2009/06/23

Issue #1680 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.
[#24011] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Xuân Baldauf <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1680 has been updated by Xu但n Baldauf.
[#24012] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1680 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#24013] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Xuân Baldauf <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1680 has been updated by Xu但n Baldauf.
[#24014] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1680 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#24015] Re: [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/24

Excerpts from ruby-core message of Wed Jun 24 16:55:47 +0300 2009:

[#23994] update for NEWS? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Should NEWS be updated to note that floats are more stingey now?

1 message 2009/06/23

[#23997] [Bug #1681] Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1681: Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint

6 messages 2009/06/23
[#23999] Re: [Bug #1681] Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/23

Hi,
[#24001] Re: [Bug #1681] Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/24

>> This seems needlessly verbose given that Ruby already knows
[#24030] Re: [Bug #1681] Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/25

Hi,
[#24044] Re: [Bug #1681] Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2009/06/26

We have String#encode (without any arguments), which transcodes to
[#24057] [Bug #1681](Closed) Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1681 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#24002] [Bug #1682] Low probability error in gc — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1682: Low probability error in gc

3 messages 2009/06/24
[#24003] [Bug #1682] Low probability error in gc — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1682 has been updated by John Carter.
[#24004] [Bug #1682] Low probability error in gc — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1682 has been updated by John Carter.

[#24005] Object#to: Possible Refinements on the .try_convert Methods for Type Coercion — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

Musing on type conversion, I hit on the idea of an Object#to method

1 message 2009/06/24

[#24006] [Bug #1683] Invalid Source Encodings Raise Vauge Errors — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1683: Invalid Source Encodings Raise Vauge Errors

2 messages 2009/06/24
[#24008] [Bug #1683](Closed) Invalid Source Encodings Raise Vauge Errors — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1683 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#24007] [Bug #1684] ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1 — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1684: ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1

4 messages 2009/06/24
[#24020] [Bug #1684] ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1 — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1684 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24021] Re: [Bug #1684] ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/24

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Roger Pack<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#24367] [Bug #1684](Closed) ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1684 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#24010] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — B Kelly <redmine@...>

Bug #1685: Some windows unicode path issues remain

26 messages 2009/06/24
[#27696] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...> 2010/01/22

Issue #1685 has been updated by Vit Ondruch.
[#28961] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — B Kelly <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1685 has been updated by B Kelly.
[#28977] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1685 has been updated by Vit Ondruch.
[#28979] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — B Kelly <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1685 has been updated by B Kelly.
[#28984] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/03/25

Hello,
[#29082] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/03/28

Hi,
[#29085] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/03/28

Hello,
[#29173] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/03/31

U.Nakamura wrote:
[#28986] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1685 has been updated by Vit Ondruch.
[#29189] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2010/04/01

Issue #1685 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#29200] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/04/01

Yuki Sonoda wrote:
[#29892] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/04/29

Hi,
[#30004] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/04

Hello,
[#30012] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/05

U.Nakamura wrote:
[#30013] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/05

Hello,
[#30052] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/06

U.Nakamura wrote:
[#30053] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/06

Hello,
[#30054] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/06

Hi,
[#30057] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/06

Hello,
[#30071] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/06

Hi,
[#30077] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/07

Hello,
[#30079] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/07

Hi,
[#30296] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/18

Hi,
[#30302] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/18

Hello,
[#30307] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/19

Hi,

[#24017] [Bug #1686] Enumerable#first broken — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1686: Enumerable#first broken

2 messages 2009/06/24
[#24019] [Bug #1686](Closed) Enumerable#first broken — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1686 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#24018] Net::HTTP Hangs — James Gray <james@...>

I have a weird case that seems to case Net::HTTP to hang in the middle

3 messages 2009/06/24
[#24022] Re: Net::HTTP Hangs — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/24

> 1. I call into Net::HTTP to post some data to the server
[#24023] Re: Net::HTTP Hangs — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/24

On Jun 24, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Roger Pack wrote:

[#24024] [Bug #1687] ARGF.lineno Always Returns 0 for ARGF.chars and ARGF.bytes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1687: ARGF.lineno Always Returns 0 for ARGF.chars and ARGF.bytes

4 messages 2009/06/25
[#24026] Re: [Bug #1687] ARGF.lineno Always Returns 0 for ARGF.chars and ARGF.bytes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/25

Hi,
[#24027] [Bug #1687] ARGF.lineno Always Returns 0 for ARGF.chars and ARGF.bytes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1687 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#24028] [Bug #1687](Closed) ARGF.lineno Always Returns 0 for ARGF.chars and ARGF.bytes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1687 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#24025] [Bug #1688] Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #1688: Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data

5 messages 2009/06/25
[#24034] [Bug #1688] Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1688 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24035] Re: [Bug #1688] Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/25

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Roger Pack<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#24036] Re: [Bug #1688] Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/25

>> do different versions of zlib.dll fix the problem?
[#24037] Re: [Bug #1688] Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/25

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:

[#24029] [Bug #1689] ARGF.binmode Affects Encoding Inconsistently — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1689: ARGF.binmode Affects Encoding Inconsistently

2 messages 2009/06/25
[#24031] [Bug #1689](Closed) ARGF.binmode Affects Encoding Inconsistently — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1689 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#24032] [Bug #1690] backticks don't set $? in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1690: backticks don't set $? in windows

6 messages 2009/06/25
[#24314] [Bug #1690](Rejected) backticks don't set $? in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1690 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#24317] [Bug #1690] backticks don't set $? in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1690 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24318] Re: [Bug #1690] backticks don't set $? in windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/13

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Roger Pack<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#24320] Re: [Bug #1690] backticks don't set $? in windows — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2009/07/14

Hello,
[#25074] [Bug #1690] backticks don't set $? in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/08/24

Issue #1690 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#24033] [Bug #1691] ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1691: ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option

5 messages 2009/06/25
[#24056] [Bug #1691] ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1691 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#24302] [Bug #1691](Rejected) ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1691 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#24303] [Bug #1691] ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1691 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24325] Re: [Bug #1691] ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...> 2009/07/14

On 7/13/09 8:35 PM, Roger Pack wrote:

[#24045] YAML omap test and object id collisions — Marcus Rueckert <darix@...>

hi,

1 message 2009/06/26

[#24046] [Bug #1693] ARGF.rewind Doesn't Reset ARGF.lineno — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1693: ARGF.rewind Doesn't Reset ARGF.lineno

3 messages 2009/06/26
[#25370] [Bug #1693] ARGF.rewind Doesn't Reset ARGF.lineno — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/09/04

Issue #1693 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#27099] [Bug #1693] ARGF.rewind Doesn't Reset ARGF.lineno — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/12/08

Issue #1693 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[#24050] 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

I humbly suggest that a prerequisite of 1.9.2 being released is that

6 messages 2009/06/26
[#24052] Re: 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/26

> 1.9 HEAD currently has over 350 failures and 638 errors with RubySpec.
[#24065] Re: 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/28

> Perhaps you could post the various failures somewhere and core people
[#24093] Re: 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/30

To start with, please could I have answers to the following threads?
[#25381] Re: 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/09/04

An update on the remaining 'core' spec failures under 1.9 HEAD:
[#25382] Re: 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/09/04

An update on the remaining 'core' spec failures under 1.9 HEAD:

[#24051] [Bug #1695] String interpolation Issue with escape characters inside an in-string evaluated statement — Jason Pearlman <redmine@...>

Bug #1695: String interpolation Issue with escape characters inside an in-string evaluated statement

4 messages 2009/06/26
[#24053] Re: [Bug #1695] String interpolation Issue with escape characters inside an in-string evaluated statement — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/26

> # Inside a string in #{} - bombs
[#24054] [Bug #1695] String interpolation Issue with escape characters inside an in-string evaluated statement — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1695 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#24055] [Bug #1695] String interpolation Issue with escape characters inside an in-string evaluated statement — Jason Pearlman <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1695 has been updated by Jason Pearlman.

[#24058] [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Steven Hartland <redmine@...>

Bug #1696: http downloads are unuseably slow

19 messages 2009/06/27
[#24059] [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Steven Hartland <redmine@...> 2009/06/27

Issue #1696 has been updated by Steven Hartland.
[#24060] [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Steven Hartland <redmine@...> 2009/06/27

Issue #1696 has been updated by Steven Hartland.
[#24061] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — "Muhammad A. Ali" <oldmoe@...> 2009/06/27

Net/HTTP in 1.9.2dev is already working as you described with two
[#24062] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/27

> Net/HTTP in 1.9.2dev is already working as you described with two
[#24064] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — "Muhammad A. Ali" <oldmoe@...> 2009/06/28

Not sure really, never tested it.
[#24066] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/28

Excerpts from rogerdpack's message of Sun Jun 28 02:29:12 +0300 2009:
[#24071] [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Steven Hartland <redmine@...> 2009/06/28

Issue #1696 has been updated by Steven Hartland.
[#24072] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — "Muhammad A. Ali" <oldmoe@...> 2009/06/28

I believe if the descriptor is set to non blocking then sysread will return
[#24075] [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Steven Hartland <redmine@...> 2009/06/29

Issue #1696 has been updated by Steven Hartland.
[#24081] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/06/29

In article <4a464441bf3f7_13bd3907d016634@redmine.ruby-lang.org>,
[#24082] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/29

Excerpts from Tanaka Akira's message of Mon Jun 29 21:17:58 +0300 2009:
[#24085] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/29

On Jun 29, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#24098] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Young Hyun <youngh@...> 2009/06/30

[#24087] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/29

Excerpts from James Gray's message of Tue Jun 30 00:12:23 +0300 2009:
[#24088] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/29

On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#24090] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/06/30

In article <473C3283-40AA-4079-92C0-31FA11A64BE0@grayproductions.net>,
[#24096] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/30

On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:05 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#24086] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/29

On Jun 29, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#24063] [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #1697: Object#<=>

15 messages 2009/06/28
[#24068] [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Rick DeNatale <redmine@...> 2009/06/28

Issue #1697 has been updated by Rick DeNatale.
[#24070] Re: [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/28

Excerpts from Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca's message of Sun Jun 28 16:22:45 +0300 2009:
[#24079] Re: [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/29

On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Eero Saynatkari<ruby-ml@kittensoft.org> wr=
[#24080] Re: [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/29

Excerpts from Marc-Andre's message of Mon Jun 29 15:35:52 +0300 2009:
[#25384] Re: [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/09/04

Hi,
[#26067] [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/10/13

Issue #1697 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26276] [Feature #1697](Closed) Object#<=> — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/10/24

Issue #1697 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#26318] [Feature #1697](Open) Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/10/26

Issue #1697 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26321] Re: [Feature #1697](Open) Object#<=> — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/10/26

Hi,
[#26322] Re: [Feature #1697](Open) Object#<=> — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/10/26

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Mon Oct 26 15:24:12 +0200 2009:
[#26325] [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/10/26

Issue #1697 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#27300] [Feature #1697](Assigned) Object#<=> — "ujihisa ." <redmine@...> 2009/12/23

Issue #1697 has been updated by ujihisa ..
[#27302] Re: [Feature #1697](Assigned) Object#<=> — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/24

Hi,
[#27303] [Feature #1697](Closed) Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/12/24

Issue #1697 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#24069] [ANN] RubyInstaller: Building installers story and news — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hey guys,

4 messages 2009/06/28
[#24083] Re: [ANN] RubyInstaller: Building installers story and news — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2009/06/29

> We have preview1!!!
[#24084] Re: [ANN] RubyInstaller: Building installers story and news — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/29

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jon<jon.forums@gmail.com> wrote:
[#24094] Re: [ANN] RubyInstaller: Building installers story and news — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2009/06/30

> The DevKit will be released as a gem.

[#24073] [Bug #1698] Incorrect return value for writer methods. — Mike Ryan <redmine@...>

Bug #1698: Incorrect return value for writer methods.

3 messages 2009/06/28
[#24074] [Bug #1698] Incorrect return value for writer methods. — Mike Ryan <redmine@...> 2009/06/28

Issue #1698 has been updated by Mike Ryan.
[#24076] Re: [Bug #1698] Incorrect return value for writer methods. — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/06/29

[#24077] [Bug #1699] URI::FTP to_s problem after modification — Norihisa Fujita <redmine@...>

Bug #1699: URI::FTP to_s problem after modification

4 messages 2009/06/29
[#27371] [Bug #1699] URI::FTP to_s problem after modification — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/02

Issue #1699 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#29530] [Bug #1699] URI::FTP to_s problem after modification — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/15

Issue #1699 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29531] [Bug #1699](Closed) URI::FTP to_s problem after modification — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/15

Issue #1699 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#24078] [Backport #1700] r22937 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Backport #1700: r22937 should be backported to 1.8.6

2 messages 2009/06/29
[#30398] [Backport #1700](Closed) r22937 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2010/05/24

Issue #1700 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#24091] [Bug #1705] Ruby macros on windows — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...>

Bug #1705: Ruby macros on windows

2 messages 2009/06/30
[#24092] [Bug #1705](Rejected) Ruby macros on windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/30

Issue #1705 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#24095] [Bug #1706] Broken Finalizers — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1706: Broken Finalizers

1 message 2009/06/30

[#24097] [Bug #1707] Proc#call Raises ThreadError on 1.8 HEAD; LocalJumpError on Other Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1707: Proc#call Raises ThreadError on 1.8 HEAD; LocalJumpError on Other Versions

3 messages 2009/06/30
[#24102] Re: [Bug #1707] Proc#call Raises ThreadError on 1.8 HEAD; LocalJumpError on Other Versions — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/07/01

Hi,
[#24103] [Bug #1707](Closed) Proc#call Raises ThreadError on 1.8 HEAD; LocalJumpError on Other Versions — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/07/01

Issue #1707 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#24099] [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1708: require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour

8 messages 2009/06/30
[#24126] [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/07/03

Issue #1708 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#24128] Re: [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/07/03

Hi,
[#24129] [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/07/03

Issue #1708 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#24130] Re: [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/07/03

Hi,
[#24131] [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/07/03

Issue #1708 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#24133] [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/07/04

Issue #1708 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#24306] [Bug #1708](Rejected) require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1708 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#24100] [Bug #1709] Marshal.dump Uses Different Definition of 'Depth' on 1.9? — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1709: Marshal.dump Uses Different Definition of 'Depth' on 1.9?

2 messages 2009/06/30
[#24101] [Bug #1709](Closed) Marshal.dump Uses Different Definition of 'Depth' on 1.9? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/30

Issue #1709 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[ruby-core:23773] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install

From: Jim Deville <jdeville@...>
Date: 2009-06-09 18:03:31 UTC
List: ruby-core #23773 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In This Thread

Prev Next