ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#23657] [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1550: String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes

13 messages 2009/06/01
[#23662] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/01

Hi,
[#23663] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/01

On Jun 1, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#23664] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/01

Hi,
[#23671] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/02

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#23707] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/04

matz,
[#23714] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/05

Hi,
[#23665] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/01

I couldn't agree more! I'd find it most surprising if
[#23666] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/01

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#23672] [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/02

Issue #1550 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#23675] Re: [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Alex <imphasing@...> 2009/06/02

This change seems to break the build on my machine:
[#23681] Re: [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/03

Hi,
[#23689] Re: [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Alex <imphasing@...> 2009/06/03

[alex@platypus ruby]$ cat rbconfig.rb

[#23658] [Bug #1551] String#slice! Raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1551: String#slice! Raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes

2 messages 2009/06/01
[#23694] [Bug #1551](Closed) String#slice! Raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1551 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23659] [Bug #1552] String#strip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1552: String#strip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes

2 messages 2009/06/01
[#23695] [Bug #1552](Closed) String#strip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1552 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23660] [Bug #1553] String#index Ignores Out-of-Range Offset When Given Regexp Matching the Empty String — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1553: String#index Ignores Out-of-Range Offset When Given Regexp Matching the Empty String

2 messages 2009/06/01
[#24324] [Bug #1553](Closed) String#index Ignores Out-of-Range Offset When Given Regexp Matching the Empty String — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/07/14

Issue #1553 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23661] [Bug #1554] Enumerator#first & #take should consume only what is needed [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1554: Enumerator#first & #take should consume only what is needed [patch]

2 messages 2009/06/01
[#23680] [Bug #1554](Closed) Enumerator#first & #take should consume only what is needed [patch] — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1554 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23668] [Bug #1555] Inaccessible 'io' parameter in Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.initialize(x,y,io) — Howard Kapustein <redmine@...>

Bug #1555: Inaccessible 'io' parameter in Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.initialize(x,y,io)

1 message 2009/06/02

[#23670] [Bug #1557] Memory leak in DRb — Thibaut Neiger <redmine@...>

Bug #1557: Memory leak in DRb

3 messages 2009/06/02
[#23691] [Bug #1557] Memory leak in DRb — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1557 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23690] [Bug #1557] Memory leak in DRb — Thibaut Neiger <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1557 has been updated by Thibaut Neiger.

[#23674] [Bug #1558] test timeout issues in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1558: test timeout issues in windows

5 messages 2009/06/02
[#29552] [Bug #1558](Feedback) test timeout issues in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1558 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#30128] [Bug #1558] test timeout issues in windows — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/10

Issue #1558 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30131] [Bug #1558] test timeout issues in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/05/10

Issue #1558 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#30439] [Bug #1558](Closed) test timeout issues in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/26

Issue #1558 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23682] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — James Zhang <redmine@...>

Bug #1559: ERB single line comment does not work

6 messages 2009/06/03
[#23684] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1559 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.
[#24714] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — Johannes Fahrenkrug <redmine@...> 2009/08/03

Issue #1559 has been updated by Johannes Fahrenkrug.
[#24926] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — khaled alhabache <redmine@...> 2009/08/15

Issue #1559 has been updated by khaled alhabache.
[#29269] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — Robin Salkeld <redmine@...> 2010/04/06

Issue #1559 has been updated by Robin Salkeld.
[#29512] [Bug #1559](Rejected) ERB single line comment does not work — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #1559 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23683] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — David Cuadrado <redmine@...>

Bug #1560: multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression)

6 messages 2009/06/03
[#27872] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #1560 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#27955] Re: [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/29

Hi,
[#28675] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/03/15

Issue #1560 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#30219] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #1560 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30224] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #1560 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23685] [Backport #1562] r22674 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Backport #1562: r22674 should be backported to 1.8.6

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23686] [Bug #1563] Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Bug #1563: Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23687] [Backport #1563] Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Issue #1563 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23693] [Backport #1563](Closed) Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...>

Issue #1563 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23696] [Bug #1565] iconv self-destructed — Mark Eriksen <redmine@...>

Bug #1565: iconv self-destructed

2 messages 2009/06/03
[#23711] [Bug #1565] iconv self-destructed — Mark Eriksen <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1565 has been updated by Mark Eriksen.

[#23697] [Bug #1566] sprintf with %e or %E Format Specifer Incorrectly Capitalises Inf and NaN — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1566: sprintf with %e or %E Format Specifer Incorrectly Capitalises Inf and NaN

2 messages 2009/06/03
[#25462] [Bug #1566] sprintf with %e or %E Format Specifer Incorrectly Capitalises Inf and NaN — "m ." <redmine@...> 2009/09/07

Issue #1566 has been updated by m ..

[#23698] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #1567: socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures

5 messages 2009/06/03
[#23710] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1567 has been updated by Mike Pomraning.
[#27873] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #1567 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#29385] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1567 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30512] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #1567 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23699] Change in How $~ is Restored After String#sub/String#gsub with a ?Block — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

Hi,

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23700] Standard Ruby bytecode — Ioannis Nousias <s0238762@...>

I came across this post:

4 messages 2009/06/04
[#23701] Re: Standard Ruby bytecode — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/04

Excerpts from Ioannis Nousias's message of Thu Jun 04 12:11:06 +0300 2009:
[#23709] Re: Standard Ruby bytecode — Ioannis Nousias <s0238762@...> 2009/06/04

Eero and Rick,
[#23704] Re: Standard Ruby bytecode — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/06/04

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org> wrote:

[#23702] [Bug #1568] Revision 23639 build error OSX 10.5.7 — Mike Stok <redmine@...>

Bug #1568: Revision 23639 build error OSX 10.5.7

2 messages 2009/06/04
[#23708] [Bug #1568](Closed) Revision 23639 build error OSX 10.5.7 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/04

Issue #1568 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23703] [Bug #1569] gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Marc Paterno <redmine@...>

Bug #1569: gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault.

4 messages 2009/06/04
[#23705] Re: [Bug #1569] gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/04

gem update --system does seem to work with my p129
[#27877] [Bug #1569] gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #1569 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#29388] [Bug #1569](Feedback) gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1569 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23706] Inconsistent behavior on 1.8 and 1.9 of String#[]= with single Fixnum argument — brian ford <brixen@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2009/06/04
[#23712] Re: Inconsistent behavior on 1.8 and 1.9 of String#[]= with single Fixnum argument — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/05

That's a tricky question!

[#23713] [Bug]Is this a bug about thread_reset_event_flags? — "Tetsu Soh" <tetsu.soh.dev@...>

Hello,

1 message 2009/06/05

[#23715] [Bug #1571] Hash Methods Behaving Inconsistently with Frozen Hashes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1571: Hash Methods Behaving Inconsistently with Frozen Hashes

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#23751] [Bug #1571](Closed) Hash Methods Behaving Inconsistently with Frozen Hashes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/08

Issue #1571 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23716] [Bug #1572] Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching — Thomas Martitz <redmine@...>

Bug #1572: Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching

3 messages 2009/06/05
[#23719] [Bug #1572](Rejected) Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1572 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#23731] Re: [Bug #1572] Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,

[#23717] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Morris Brodersen <redmine@...>

Bug #1573: $0 behaves unexpectedly

7 messages 2009/06/05
[#23718] Re: [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/05

Excerpts from Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca's message of Fri Jun 05 19:07:18 +0300 2009:
[#23720] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Morris Brodersen <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1573 has been updated by Morris Brodersen.
[#29403] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/10

Issue #1573 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29482] Re: [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/12

Hi,
[#30584] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/06/04

Issue #1573 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30591] [Bug #1573][Closed] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/06/05

Issue #1573 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23721] [Bug #1574] test_systemcallerror_eq(TestDelegateClass) on windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1574: test_systemcallerror_eq(TestDelegateClass) on windows

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#29781] [Bug #1574](Closed) test_systemcallerror_eq(TestDelegateClass) on windows — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/04/24

Issue #1574 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#23722] [Bug #1575] TestEtc failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1575: TestEtc failures in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#30011] [Bug #1575](Closed) TestEtc failures in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/05/05

Issue #1575 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23723] [Bug #1576] TestFile failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1576: TestFile failures in windows

4 messages 2009/06/05
[#30174] [Bug #1576](Assigned) TestFile failures in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/12

Issue #1576 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#30204] [Bug #1576](Closed) TestFile failures in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #1576 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#30188] [Bug #1576] TestFile failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/05/12

Issue #1576 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23724] [Bug #1577] testFileUtils failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1577: testFileUtils failure in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#29995] [Bug #1577](Closed) testFileUtils failure in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/05/04

Issue #1577 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23725] [Bug #1578] TestFloat failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1578: TestFloat failure in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#29547] [Bug #1578](Closed) TestFloat failure in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1578 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23726] [Bug #1579] TestGDBM failure in mingw — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1579: TestGDBM failure in mingw

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#29551] [Bug #1579](Third Party's Issue) TestGDBM failure in mingw — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1579 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23727] [Bug #1580] TestIOScanF failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1580: TestIOScanF failure in windows

4 messages 2009/06/05
[#23734] Re: [Bug #1580] TestIOScanF failure in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,
[#23810] [Bug #1580](Closed) TestIOScanF failure in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1580 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23826] Re: [Bug #1580](Closed) TestIOScanF failure in windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> Issue #1580 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23728] [Bug #1581] Test_IO17M failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1581: Test_IO17M failure in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05
[#29548] [Bug #1581] Test_IO17M failure in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1581 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23729] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1583: Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError?

14 messages 2009/06/05
[#27283] [Bug #1583](Closed) Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/12/22

Issue #1583 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#23816] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#23733] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,
[#23735] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,
[#23743] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#23744] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — daz <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2009/06/07

Akira Tanaka wrote:
[#23746] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/07

Hi,
[#23748] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/07

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Sun Jun 07 17:07:06 +0300 2009:
[#23752] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...> 2009/06/08

On 2009/06/08 0:27, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#23756] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/08

I'd like to second long explicit names. Maybe it's because I'm not
[#23747] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#24043] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#26995] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/12/02

Issue #1583 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23730] SVN for committers seems to be down — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

$ svn info

1 message 2009/06/05

[#23732] Fwd: ruby_frame in 1.8 is what in 1.9? — Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@...>

So I have some C++ extension code that nicely uses ruby_frame->orig_func and

1 message 2009/06/06

[#23736] [Bug #1584] return from lambda within 2 procs freezes — Glen Gerstman <redmine@...>

Bug #1584: return from lambda within 2 procs freezes

3 messages 2009/06/06
[#29390] [Bug #1584](Closed) return from lambda within 2 procs freezes — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1584 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#23855] [Bug #1584] return from lambda within 2 procs freezes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1584 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#23737] [Bug #1585] general auto string literal concatenation — Glen Gerstman <redmine@...>

Bug #1585: general auto string literal concatenation

2 messages 2009/06/06
[#28989] [Feature #1585] general auto string literal concatenation — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1585 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23738] Ducktyping interface — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

Matz,

6 messages 2009/06/07
[#23739] Re: Ducktyping interface — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/06/07

I should add that further examination reveals that people who make proxy
[#23788] Re: Ducktyping interface — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/06/10

Hi,
[#23745] Re: Ducktyping interface — Stephen Sykes <sdsykes@...> 2009/06/07

I would hope that it's a spec.
[#23789] Re: Ducktyping interface — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/06/10

Hi,
[#23758] Re: Ducktyping interface — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/06/08

Hi,

[#23740] [Bug #1586] Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...>

Bug #1586: Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored

3 messages 2009/06/07
[#23741] [Feature #1586] Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored — Rick DeNatale <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1586 has been updated by Rick DeNatale.
[#23742] [Feature #1586] Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1586 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.

[#23749] idLAST_TOKEN definition in '.../template/id.h.tmpl' — "daz (c)" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>

I can't see idLAST_TOKEN in use anywhere in the source distribution

2 messages 2009/06/07
[#23750] Re: idLAST_TOKEN definition in '.../template/id.h.tmpl' — "daz (c)" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2009/06/07

or, strictly ...

[#23753] [Bug #1587] Problem with string sharing — Quet Zal <redmine@...>

Bug #1587: Problem with string sharing

4 messages 2009/06/08
[#23754] Re: [Bug #1587] Problem with string sharing — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/08

Excerpts from redmine message on Mon Jun 08 15:07:21 +0300 2009:
[#23755] Re: [Bug #1587] Problem with string sharing — Quet Zal <i.am.quetz@...> 2009/06/08

Here's even more simplified example how to reproduce this bug. (First one
[#29973] [Bug #1587](Closed) Problem with string sharing — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #1587 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#23757] [Backport #1589] Backport BigDecimal fixes — Kirk Haines <redmine@...>

Backport #1589: Backport BigDecimal fixes

2 messages 2009/06/08
[#23786] [Backport #1589](Closed) Backport BigDecimal fixes — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2009/06/10

Issue #1589 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#23759] [Bug #1590] Unexpected behaviour of Array.| — Jens Kanschik <redmine@...>

Bug #1590: Unexpected behaviour of Array.|

1 message 2009/06/08

[#23766] [Bug #1591] DATA handle unusable in required modules — Chris Davaz <redmine@...>

Bug #1591: DATA handle unusable in required modules

1 message 2009/06/09

[#23767] [Bug #1592] [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue — Joseph Pecoraro <redmine@...>

Bug #1592: [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue

3 messages 2009/06/09
[#24038] [Bug #1592] [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue — Joseph Pecoraro <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1592 has been updated by Joseph Pecoraro.
[#24039] [Bug #1592](Closed) [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1592 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23768] [Bug #1593] Exception backtrace within eval lacks topmost function — Chris Howlett <redmine@...>

Bug #1593: Exception backtrace within eval lacks topmost function

1 message 2009/06/09

[#23769] [Bug #1594] Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows — Barry DeZonia <redmine@...>

Bug #1594: Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows

3 messages 2009/06/09
[#23771] [Bug #1594] Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows — Barry DeZonia <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1594 has been updated by Barry DeZonia.
[#23774] [Bug #1594] Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1594 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23770] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Robert Gonzalez <redmine@...>

Bug #1595: rake unusable on windows install

10 messages 2009/06/09
[#23772] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1595 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23773] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2009/06/09

SGF2ZSB5b3UgY2hlY2tlZCB0aGUgY21kIGZpbGU/IEl0IG1pZ2h0IGJlIHBvaW50aW5nIHRvIGFu
[#23775] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2009/06/09

UGxlYXNlIGRpc3JlZ2FyZCB0aGlzLCBJIGRpZG4ndCByZWFkIHRoZSBvcmlnaW5hbCB2ZXJ5IHdl
[#23776] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/09

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Robert Gonzalez<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrot=
[#23779] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Robert Gonzalez <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1595 has been updated by Robert Gonzalez.
[#23782] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2009/06/10

[#23780] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Robert Gonzalez <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1595 has been updated by Robert Gonzalez.
[#24436] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Pat Parslow <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1595 has been updated by Pat Parslow.
[#24438] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/18

On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Pat Parslow<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#23781] [HEADSUP] RubyGems 1.3.4 in trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

I have updated RubyGems to 1.3.4 r2223

2 messages 2009/06/09
[#23823] Re: [HEADSUP] RubyGems 1.3.4 in trunk — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Eric Hodel<drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#23784] Observable on Set? — James Coglan <jcoglan@...>

Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage

2 messages 2009/06/10
[#23785] Re: Observable on Set? — James Coglan <jcoglan@...> 2009/06/10

2009/6/10 James Coglan <jcoglan@googlemail.com>

[#23793] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — okkez _ <redmine@...>

Feature #1599: ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message

6 messages 2009/06/11
[#23794] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1599 has been updated by Lin Jen-Shin.
[#23795] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1599 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23814] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1599 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#28854] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/22

Issue #1599 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29077] Re: [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/03/28

[#23796] [Bug #1602] TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1602: TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole)

3 messages 2009/06/11
[#29550] [Bug #1602](Assigned) TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1602 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#29563] [Bug #1602](Closed) TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole) — Masaki Suketa <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1602 has been updated by Masaki Suketa.

[#23797] [Bug #1603] TestOpen3 failure (windows) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1603: TestOpen3 failure (windows)

3 messages 2009/06/11
[#29878] [Bug #1603] TestOpen3 failure (windows) — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/04/29

Issue #1603 has been updated by _ wanabe.
[#29879] [Bug #1603](Closed) TestOpen3 failure (windows) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/29

Issue #1603 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23798] [Bug #1604] TestPath failure (mingw) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1604: TestPath failure (mingw)

2 messages 2009/06/11
[#29549] [Bug #1604](Closed) TestPath failure (mingw) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1604 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23799] [Bug #1605] TestProcess failure — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1605: TestProcess failure

2 messages 2009/06/11
[#30272] [Bug #1605](Closed) TestProcess failure — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/17

Issue #1605 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23800] [Bug #1606] TestRequire failure — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1606: TestRequire failure

3 messages 2009/06/11
[#24944] [Bug #1606] TestRequire failure — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/08/17

Issue #1606 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#26849] [Bug #1606](Rejected) TestRequire failure — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1606 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23801] [Bug #1607] TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1607: TestSocket failures

4 messages 2009/06/11
[#24384] [Bug #1607] TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1607 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23803] [Bug #1607] TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1607 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#26846] [Bug #1607](Closed) TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1607 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23802] [Bug #1608] einval in getsockname (windows) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1608: einval in getsockname (windows)

3 messages 2009/06/11
[#24414] [Bug #1608] einval in getsockname (windows) — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1608 has been updated by Heesob Park.
[#24423] [Bug #1608](Closed) einval in getsockname (windows) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1608 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23804] [Bug #1609] inetv6 failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1609: inetv6 failures in windows

3 messages 2009/06/11
[#23819] Re: [Bug #1609] inetv6 failures in windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> 117) Error:
[#26847] [Bug #1609](Closed) inetv6 failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1609 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23805] [Bug #1610] BasicSocket errors (doze) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1610: BasicSocket errors (doze)

2 messages 2009/06/11
[#26848] [Bug #1610] BasicSocket errors (doze) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1610 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23806] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1611: win32ole errors from make test all

5 messages 2009/06/11
[#24385] [Bug #1611](Closed) win32ole errors from make test all — Masaki Suketa <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1611 has been updated by Masaki Suketa.
[#24386] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Masaki Suketa <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1611 has been updated by Masaki Suketa.
[#23809] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1611 has been updated by Heesob Park.
[#24366] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1611 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23807] suggestion for string concatenation [RCR] — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Currently with Ruby if you want to concatenate objects to a string,

2 messages 2009/06/11
[#23808] Re: suggestion for string concatenation [RCR] — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/11

Hi,

[#23813] [Bug #1613] Segfault due to stack overflow — Robert Dober <redmine@...>

Bug #1613: Segfault due to stack overflow

4 messages 2009/06/12
[#23958] [Bug #1613](Closed) Segfault due to stack overflow — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1613 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#23890] Re: [Bug #1613] Segfault due to stack overflow — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/17

Hi,
[#23817] Re: [Bug #1613] Segfault due to stack overflow — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> When using a closure or param to cache values for recursive calls, the stack overflow is not caught but segfaults.

[#23815] inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...>

Hello,

9 messages 2009/06/12
[#23818] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> This works on Linux by persisting socket.fileno from the parent process a=
[#23820] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Knutaf H <knutaf@...> 2009/06/12

Well, I'm already not exactly using pure Ruby, since I'm wrapping
[#23822] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> Besides that, I think using WSADuplicateSocket will suffer from the
[#23837] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...> 2009/06/13

I tried that with both the HANDLE value and with an fd value that I
[#23838] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/13

> I tried that with both the HANDLE value and with an fd value that I
[#23841] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...> 2009/06/13

I don't think I gave enough context...
[#23871] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...> 2009/06/16

Any other data I should present?
[#23874] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/16

> Any other data I should present?

[#23821] [Bug #1616] Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError — Michael Fellinger <redmine@...>

Bug #1616: Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError

3 messages 2009/06/12
[#23825] Re: [Bug #1616] Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> =A0 =A0# Another name for Timeout::Error, defined for backwards compatibi=
[#23830] [Bug #1616](Closed) Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1616 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23824] [Bug #1617] Exception Raised by Uncaught Throw (Disagreement Between Documentation and Reality) — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1617: Exception Raised by Uncaught Throw (Disagreement Between Documentation and Reality)

2 messages 2009/06/12
[#23829] [Bug #1617](Closed) Exception Raised by Uncaught Throw (Disagreement Between Documentation and Reality) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1617 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23827] [Bug #1618] Kernel.catch without Arguments — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1618: Kernel.catch without Arguments

2 messages 2009/06/12
[#23831] [Bug #1618](Closed) Kernel.catch without Arguments — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1618 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23828] [Bug #1619] [PATCH] Kernel.local_variables Documentation: Symbols are Returned on 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1619: [PATCH] Kernel.local_variables Documentation: Symbols are Returned on 1.9

2 messages 2009/06/12
[#23832] [Bug #1619](Closed) [PATCH] Kernel.local_variables Documentation: Symbols are Returned on 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1619 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23833] [Bug #1620] [PATCH] Kernel.require Normalises Paths in 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1620: [PATCH] Kernel.require Normalises Paths in 1.9

2 messages 2009/06/13
[#23895] [Bug #1620](Closed) [PATCH] Kernel.require Normalises Paths in 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1620 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23834] [Bug #1621] autoload Doesn't Call #to_path on non-String Argument — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1621: autoload Doesn't Call #to_path on non-String Argument

2 messages 2009/06/13
[#23836] [Bug #1621](Closed) autoload Doesn't Call #to_path on non-String Argument — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/13

Issue #1621 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23835] [Bug #1622] [PATCH] Module.autoload Documentation Fix — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1622: [PATCH] Module.autoload Documentation Fix

2 messages 2009/06/13
[#23894] [Bug #1622](Closed) [PATCH] Module.autoload Documentation Fix — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1622 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23839] [Bug #1624] [PATCH] Documentation for File#size — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1624: [PATCH] Documentation for File#size

2 messages 2009/06/13
[#23846] [Bug #1624](Closed) [PATCH] Documentation for File#size — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1624 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23840] [Bug #1625] Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1625: Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option

3 messages 2009/06/13
[#29329] [Bug #1625](Feedback) Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1625 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30510] [Bug #1625][Closed] Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #1625 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23842] request for updated ri/rdoc on 1.8.7 branch — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

would it be possible to get a newer version of ri/rdoc installed on

3 messages 2009/06/13
[#23865] Re: request for updated ri/rdoc on 1.8.7 branch — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2009/06/15

On Jun 13, 2009, at 13:27, Roger Pack wrote:
[#24291] Re: request for updated ri/rdoc on 1.8.7 branch — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/12

>> would it be possible to get a newer version of ri/rdoc installed on

[#23843] Differences in Rational Between 1.8 and 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

I'm writing RubySpec specifications for Rational in 1.9. Enumerated

3 messages 2009/06/13
[#23856] Re: Differences in Rational Between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/14

Hi,
[#23857] Re: Differences in Rational Between 1.8 and 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/15

> All of above are intentional. =C2=A0No need to file bug. =C2=A0Most of th=

[#23844] [Bug #1626] Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1626: Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments

3 messages 2009/06/13
[#27220] [Bug #1626](Closed) Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/12/19

Issue #1626 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#27221] [Bug #1626] Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/12/19

Issue #1626 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23845] [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1627: Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths

5 messages 2009/06/13
[#23847] [Bug #1627](Closed) Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1627 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23848] [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1627 has been updated by Heesob Park.
[#23896] Re: [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/17

Hi,
[#23897] Re: [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/17

Hi,

[#23849] [Bug #1629] [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Markus Fischer <redmine@...>

Bug #1629: [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults

4 messages 2009/06/14
[#23861] Re: [Bug #1629] [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/15

> C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\mfischer>irb
[#23862] Re: [Bug #1629] [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2009/06/15

2009/6/15 Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com>:
[#29330] [Bug #1629](Rejected) [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1629 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23850] instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — apeiros <apeiros@...>

Hi folks

10 messages 2009/06/14
[#23877] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2009/06/16

Hi,
[#23879] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — apeiros <apeiros@...> 2009/06/16

Am 16.06.2009 um 22:12 schrieb Yusuke ENDOH:
[#23880] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Florian Gilcher <flo@...> 2009/06/16

[#23904] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — apeiros <apeiros@...> 2009/06/17

Am 17.06.2009 um 00:01 schrieb Florian Gilcher:
[#23905] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Florian Gilcher <flo@...> 2009/06/17

[#24334] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/15

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Florian Gilcher<flo@andersground.net> wrote:
[#24524] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/23

> I for one would support instance_exec getting backported to Ruby.
[#23866] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/06/16

[#23870] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/16

Hi,

[#23851] [Bug #1631] Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1631: Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable

3 messages 2009/06/14
[#29331] [Bug #1631] Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1631 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30509] [Bug #1631][Closed] Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #1631 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23852] [Bug #1632] ARGF's Iterators Return nill Instead of self — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1632: ARGF's Iterators Return nill Instead of self

2 messages 2009/06/14
[#23860] [Bug #1632](Closed) ARGF's Iterators Return nill Instead of self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/15

Issue #1632 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23853] [Bug #1633] ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1633: ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9

4 messages 2009/06/14
[#23867] [Bug #1633](Closed) ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/16

Issue #1633 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#23868] Re: [Bug #1633] ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/16

Hi,
[#24591] [Backport #1633](Assigned) ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/07/29

Issue #1633 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23854] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1635: ARGF Has No Documentation

7 messages 2009/06/14
[#24049] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1635 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#23891] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1635 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#23858] Re: [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/15

Hi,
[#24656] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/08/01

Issue #1635 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#25430] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/09/05

Issue #1635 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#25433] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Nobuhiro IMAI <redmine@...> 2009/09/06

Issue #1635 has been updated by Nobuhiro IMAI.

[#23859] [Bug #1636] Rational#coerce(Rational) Raises TypeError — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1636: Rational#coerce(Rational) Raises TypeError

2 messages 2009/06/15
[#23884] [Bug #1636](Closed) Rational#coerce(Rational) Raises TypeError — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/16

Issue #1636 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.

[#23864] [Bug #1639] YAML.load fails on some Regexps — viktor tron <redmine@...>

Bug #1639: YAML.load fails on some Regexps

1 message 2009/06/15

[#23869] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1640: [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class

12 messages 2009/06/16
[#23921] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#23922] Re: [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/19

> ok, i understand.
[#23923] Re: [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2009/06/19

On Jun 18, 2009, at 17:42, Run Paint Run Run wrote:
[#23899] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#23901] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1640 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#23906] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#23909] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/18

Issue #1640 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#23916] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/18

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#23920] Re: [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/18

> i'm not good at english.
[#23927] [Bug #1640] [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#24442] [Bug #1640](Closed) [PATCH] Documentation for the Rational Class — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/07/19

Issue #1640 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.

[#23872] [Bug #1641] File::SEPARATOR not platform-specific — 戈 吕 <redmine@...>

Bug #1641: File::SEPARATOR not platform-specific

2 messages 2009/06/16
[#23873] [Bug #1641](Rejected) File::SEPARATOR not platform-specific — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/16

Issue #1641 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23875] [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Issue #1392 has been updated by Roger Pack.

1 message 2009/06/16

[#23876] [Bug #1643] documentation are installed to the wrong dir in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1643: documentation are installed to the wrong dir in windows

3 messages 2009/06/16
[#23900] [Bug #1643] documentation are installed to the wrong dir in windows — Yutaka Kanemoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1643 has been updated by Yutaka Kanemoto.
[#23902] [Bug #1643](Closed) documentation are installed to the wrong dir in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1643 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23878] trouble registering and logging in to the issue tracking system — Knutaf H <knutaf@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2009/06/16
[#23882] Re: trouble registering and logging in to the issue tracking system — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/16

> Any ideas what might be wrong?
[#23885] Re: trouble registering and logging in to the issue tracking system — Knutaf H <knutaf@...> 2009/06/16

Opera and multiple versions of IE give exactly the same result:
[#23886] Re: trouble registering and logging in to the issue tracking system — Tommy Nordgren <tommy.nordgren@...> 2009/06/16

[#23892] Re: trouble registering and logging in to the issue tracking system — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...> 2009/06/17

I am brilliant and typoed my username, not password. Hooray for me now being

[#23883] Merging recent Ruby threading improvements — Joe Damato <ice799@...>

Hi ruby-core and CC'ed friends -

5 messages 2009/06/16
[#23888] Re: Merging recent Ruby threading improvements — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/17

Hi,
[#23889] Re: Merging recent Ruby threading improvements — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/06/17

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#23887] Re: Merging recent Ruby threading improvements — Brian Mitchell <binary42@...> 2009/06/17

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 19:20, Joe Damato<ice799@gmail.com> wrote:
[#23898] Re: Merging recent Ruby threading improvements — Kirk Haines <wyhaines@...> 2009/06/17

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Joe Damato<ice799@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23893] [Bug #1644] recv on inherited socket wrapped in TCPSocket does not read data, on Windows — Kedar H <redmine@...>

Bug #1644: recv on inherited socket wrapped in TCPSocket does not read data, on Windows

2 messages 2009/06/17
[#24531] [Feature #1644] recv on inherited socket wrapped in TCPSocket does not read data, on Windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/23

Issue #1644 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23903] [Bug #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1648: Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument

9 messages 2009/06/17
[#25168] [Bug #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — David Calavera <redmine@...> 2009/08/27

Issue #1648 has been updated by David Calavera.
[#25169] [Bug #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Rick DeNatale <redmine@...> 2009/08/27

Issue #1648 has been updated by Rick DeNatale.
[#25171] [Bug #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/08/27

Issue #1648 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#25172] [Bug #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — David Calavera <redmine@...> 2009/08/28

Issue #1648 has been updated by David Calavera.
[#25753] [Bug #1648](Closed) Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/24

Issue #1648 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26796] [Backport #1648](Assigned) Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/11/18

Issue #1648 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#26823] [Backport #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/11/19

Issue #1648 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#26811] [Backport #1648] Rational#div Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Argument — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/11/18

Issue #1648 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23907] [Bug #1649] use of #send in MonitorMixin::extend_object fails for BasicSocket objects — Young Hyun <redmine@...>

Bug #1649: use of #send in MonitorMixin::extend_object fails for BasicSocket objects

2 messages 2009/06/18
[#23941] [Bug #1649](Closed) use of #send in MonitorMixin::extend_object fails for BasicSocket objects — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1649 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23908] [Bug #1650] Time range === is slow — Dmitry Bilunov <redmine@...>

Bug #1650: Time range === is slow

4 messages 2009/06/18
[#23919] [Bug #1650] Time range === is slow — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2009/06/18

Issue #1650 has been updated by Eric Hodel.
[#23935] Re: [Bug #1650] Time range === is slow — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/19

Hi,
[#33972] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#1650] Time range === is slow — Christopher Dunn <redmine@...> 2010/12/28

Issue #1650 has been updated by Christopher Dunn.

[#23910] [Bug #1651] Segfault for #numerator and #denominator on Numeric Subclass — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1651: Segfault for #numerator and #denominator on Numeric Subclass

2 messages 2009/06/18
[#23915] [Bug #1651](Closed) Segfault for #numerator and #denominator on Numeric Subclass — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/18

Issue #1651 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.

[#23911] [Bug #1652] pathname issues warning — Robert Dober <redmine@...>

Bug #1652: pathname issues warning

2 messages 2009/06/18
[#23940] [Bug #1652](Closed) pathname issues warning — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1652 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23912] [Bug #1653] YAML load_documents fails on specification example without newline at end — Benjamin ter Kuile <redmine@...>

Bug #1653: YAML load_documents fails on specification example without newline at end

1 message 2009/06/18

[#23913] Broken finalizers in ruby 1.8 — Stanislav Sedov <stas@...>

Hi!

3 messages 2009/06/18
[#23918] Re: Broken finalizers in ruby 1.8 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/18

Hi,
[#23928] Re: Broken finalizers in ruby 1.8 — Stanislav Sedov <stas@...> 2009/06/19

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:33:44 +0900

[#23914] [Bug #1654] Segmentation fault after a "make install" under OpenSolaris 2009.06 — Pedro Saraiva <redmine@...>

Bug #1654: Segmentation fault after a "make install" under OpenSolaris 2009.06

4 messages 2009/06/18
[#24312] [Bug #1654] Segmentation fault after a "make install" under OpenSolaris 2009.06 — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1654 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#24408] [Bug #1654] Segmentation fault after a "make install" under OpenSolaris 2009.06 — Pedro Saraiva <redmine@...> 2009/07/17

Issue #1654 has been updated by Pedro Saraiva.
[#25024] [Bug #1654] Segmentation fault after a "make install" under OpenSolaris 2009.06 — Pedro Saraiva <redmine@...> 2009/08/21

Issue #1654 has been updated by Pedro Saraiva.

[#23917] ruby 1.8/1.9 URI merge call for FTP uris is broken. — Stanislav Sedov <stas@...>

Hi!

1 message 2009/06/18

[#23925] [Bug #1657] Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version — karim rayani <redmine@...>

Bug #1657: Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version

5 messages 2009/06/19
[#23937] Re: [Bug #1657] Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/19

> on Windows XP when performing =A0>> gem install db2
[#23930] [Bug #1657] Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1657 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#23963] [Bug #1657] Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version — karim rayani <redmine@...> 2009/06/22

Issue #1657 has been updated by karim rayani.
[#23964] [Bug #1657] Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version — karim rayani <redmine@...> 2009/06/22

Issue #1657 has been updated by karim rayani.

[#23926] [Bug #1658] Encoding.name_list Returns Dummy Encodings Contrary to Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1658: Encoding.name_list Returns Dummy Encodings Contrary to Documentation

3 messages 2009/06/19
[#23929] Re: [Bug #1658] Encoding.name_list Returns Dummy Encodings Contrary to Documentation — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/19

Hi,
[#23931] [Bug #1658](Closed) Encoding.name_list Returns Dummy Encodings Contrary to Documentation — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1658 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23932] [Bug #1659] Segfault with Encoding::Converter.asciicompat_encoding('internal') — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1659: Segfault with Encoding::Converter.asciicompat_encoding('internal')

2 messages 2009/06/19
[#23953] [Bug #1659](Closed) Segfault with Encoding::Converter.asciicompat_encoding('internal') — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1659 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23933] Stack size detection algorithm — Stanislav Sedov <stas@...>

Hi!

1 message 2009/06/19

[#23934] [Bug #1661] RegExp mismatch — Adam Carheden <redmine@...>

Bug #1661: RegExp mismatch

6 messages 2009/06/19
[#23936] [Bug #1661](Assigned) RegExp mismatch — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1661 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#23939] [Bug #1661](Rejected) RegExp mismatch — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/19

Issue #1661 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23942] Re: [Bug #1661](Rejected) RegExp mismatch — Hirotsugu Asari <asari.ruby@...> 2009/06/20

[#23951] Re: [Bug #1661](Rejected) RegExp mismatch — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/21

Hi,
[#23954] Re: [Bug #1661](Rejected) RegExp mismatch — Hirotsugu Asari <asari.ruby@...> 2009/06/21

[#23938] [Bug #1662] 1.8.6 + windows + udp socket + ctrl +c -> hang — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1662: 1.8.6 + windows + udp socket + ctrl +c -> hang

3 messages 2009/06/19
[#23967] [Bug #1662] 1.8.6 + windows + udp socket + ctrl +c -> hang — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/22

Issue #1662 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#26844] [Bug #1662](Rejected) 1.8.6 + windows + udp socket + ctrl +c -> hang — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1662 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23943] [Bug #1663] Small documentation fixes [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1663: Small documentation fixes [patch]

2 messages 2009/06/20
[#24109] [Bug #1663](Closed) Small documentation fixes [patch] — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/07/01

Issue #1663 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23944] [Bug #1664] Kernel#define_singleton_method not documented [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1664: Kernel#define_singleton_method not documented [patch]

3 messages 2009/06/20
[#24313] [Bug #1664](Closed) Kernel#define_singleton_method not documented [patch] — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1664 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#24345] Re: [Bug #1664] Kernel#define_singleton_method not documented [patch] — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...> 2009/07/15

Thank you. The patch was applied except the last sentence.

[#23945] [Bug #1665] Enumerable#reverse_each, #entries, #to_a documentation [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1665: Enumerable#reverse_each, #entries, #to_a documentation [patch]

2 messages 2009/06/20
[#23947] [Bug #1665] Enumerable#reverse_each, #entries, #to_a documentation [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/06/20

Issue #1665 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23946] [Bug #1385] Wonderful undocumented feature in Ruby 1.8.7 & 1.9 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Issue #1385 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

1 message 2009/06/20

[#23948] [Bug #1666] Confusion in documentation for lines vs each_line, etc... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1666: Confusion in documentation for lines vs each_line, etc...

4 messages 2009/06/20
[#28416] [Bug #1666] Confusion in documentation for lines vs each_line, etc... — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/02

Issue #1666 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#28417] [Bug #1666](Closed) Confusion in documentation for lines vs each_line, etc... — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/02

Issue #1666 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#28569] [Bug #1666] Confusion in documentation for lines vs each_line, etc... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2010/03/09

Issue #1666 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23949] [Feature #1667] IO#codepoints, IO#each_codepoint, and StringIO — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #1667: IO#codepoints, IO#each_codepoint, and StringIO

2 messages 2009/06/20
[#23965] [Feature #1667](Closed) IO#codepoints, IO#each_codepoint, and StringIO — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/22

Issue #1667 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23950] [Bug #1668] Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista — Kristian Mandrup <redmine@...>

Bug #1668: Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista

4 messages 2009/06/20
[#23959] [Bug #1668] Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista — Kristian Mandrup <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1668 has been updated by Kristian Mandrup.
[#23961] Re: [Bug #1668] Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/21

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Kristian Mandrup<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#26110] [Bug #1668](Closed) Error installing ruby gems for 1.9.1 on windows vista — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/10/16

Issue #1668 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23952] [Bug #1669] FileUtils.cp file mode — Alex Dircksen <redmine@...>

Bug #1669: FileUtils.cp file mode

2 messages 2009/06/21
[#23955] [Bug #1669](Closed) FileUtils.cp file mode — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1669 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23962] Why are rb_hash_xxx symbols static to hash.c? — brian ford <brixen@...>

Hi Matz,

1 message 2009/06/22

[#23966] request for officially sanctioned tutorial/howto location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Current situation:

1 message 2009/06/22

[#23968] [Bug #1677] memory leak in DBD-mysql — Qi Lu <redmine@...>

Bug #1677: memory leak in DBD-mysql

3 messages 2009/06/22
[#23969] Re: [Bug #1677] memory leak in DBD-mysql — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2009/06/22

2009/6/22 Qi Lu <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#23970] Re: [Bug #1677] memory leak in DBD-mysql — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/22

Hi,

[#23971] [Bug #1678] uninitialized value in ossl_x509store_initialize causes occasional segfault — Peter Pawlowski <redmine@...>

Bug #1678: uninitialized value in ossl_x509store_initialize causes occasional segfault

3 messages 2009/06/22
[#23972] [Bug #1678] uninitialized value in ossl_x509store_initialize causes occasional segfault — Peter Pawlowski <redmine@...> 2009/06/22

Issue #1678 has been updated by Peter Pawlowski.
[#29035] [Bug #1678](Closed) uninitialized value in ossl_x509store_initialize causes occasional segfault — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/26

Issue #1678 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23974] REXML pretty.rb — Ed Gamble <ed.gamble@...>

[Sorry if this is the wrong forum; please forward to the proper person/

1 message 2009/06/23

[#23976] Ruby Installer - One-Click contest voting is now open! — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

I'm glad to inform that voting for One-Click Ruby Installer website

2 messages 2009/06/23
[#23982] Re: Ruby Installer - One-Click contest voting is now open! — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/06/23

2009/6/23 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:

[#23977] [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2009/06/23
[#23978] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/23

Good!
[#23979] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/23

Thanks for the update. :-)
[#24009] Re: Encoding of ENV (Was: Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2009/06/24

On Jun 23, 2009, at 02:23, Run Paint Run Run wrote:
[#24047] Re: Encoding of ENV (Was: Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622) — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/26

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Eric Hodel<drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#24048] Re: Encoding of ENV (Was: Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622) — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/26

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Eric Hodel<drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#23984] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/23

On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:23 AM, Run Paint Run Run wrote:
[#23985] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2009/06/23

> There's a far superior SQLite interface for Ruby called Amalgalite:
[#23993] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2009/06/23

James Gray wrote:
[#23996] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...> 2009/06/23

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Joel VanderWerf<vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
[#23998] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/23

On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:19 PM, Jeremy Kemper wrote:
[#24016] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/24

> It's a kind of amalgamation of boolean flip-flops and
[#24173] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/07

Sorry for late response,
[#24174] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/07

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:12 AM, NARUSE, Yui<naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#24242] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/09

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luis Lavena<luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#24250] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Jörg W Mittag <joergwmittag@...> 2009/07/10

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#24261] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/11

I agree pretty much across the board. I was actually hoping that
[#24264] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#24265] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — James Gray <james@...> 2009/07/11

On Jul 11, 2009, at 3:06 PM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#24267] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2009/07/11

James Gray wrote:
[#24294] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/12

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#24269] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

James Gray wrote:
[#24276] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — James Gray <james@...> 2009/07/11

On Jul 11, 2009, at 5:28 PM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#24266] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/11

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 5:06 PM, NARUSE, Yui<naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#24273] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

J旦rg W Mittag wrote:
[#24262] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

Luis Lavena wrote:
[#24175] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — James Gray <james@...> 2009/07/07

On Jul 6, 2009, at 10:12 PM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#24268] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

James Gray wrote:
[#23995] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...> 2009/06/23

2009/6/23 Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp>
[#24040] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/25

Hi,
[#24041] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/06/25

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto<matz@ruby-lang.org> wro=
[#24042] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/26

Hi,
[#24000] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "Muhammad A. Ali" <oldmoe@...> 2009/06/24

Good work
[#24106] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/01

2009/6/23 Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp>:
[#24107] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/01

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Charles Oliver
[#24108] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/01

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Luis Lavena<luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#24274] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/07/11

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#24168] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/06

>
[#24170] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...> 2009/07/07

It's possible adding an instruction-sequence method (iseq) into Proc would
[#24246] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/10

> I hope to include the following features into the 1.9.2. But they might
[#24260] Re: [ANN] meeting log of RubyDeveloperKaigi20090622 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/11

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23983] [Bug #1679] rb_w32_getenv() invalidates previous environment pointers — Jarek Jurasz <redmine@...>

Bug #1679: rb_w32_getenv() invalidates previous environment pointers

3 messages 2009/06/23
[#25822] [Bug #1679] rb_w32_getenv() invalidates previous environment pointers — Jarek Jurasz <redmine@...> 2009/09/28

Issue #1679 has been updated by Jarek Jurasz.
[#25823] [Bug #1679] rb_w32_getenv() invalidates previous environment pointers — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/09/28

Issue #1679 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23986] possible bug with windows `` they don't set $? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Looks like a bug? [1.8 or 1.9]

4 messages 2009/06/23
[#23987] Re: possible bug with windows `` they don't set $? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/23

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
[#23991] Re: possible bug with windows `` they don't set $? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/23

> Hello Roger,
[#23992] Re: possible bug with windows `` they don't set $? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/23

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23988] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Xuân Baldauf <redmine@...>

Bug #1680: URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default)

7 messages 2009/06/23
[#23990] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2009/06/23

Issue #1680 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.
[#24011] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Xuân Baldauf <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1680 has been updated by Xu但n Baldauf.
[#24012] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1680 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#24013] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Xuân Baldauf <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1680 has been updated by Xu但n Baldauf.
[#24014] [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1680 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#24015] Re: [Bug #1680] URI.encode does not encode '+' (by default) — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/24

Excerpts from ruby-core message of Wed Jun 24 16:55:47 +0300 2009:

[#23994] update for NEWS? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Should NEWS be updated to note that floats are more stingey now?

1 message 2009/06/23

[#23997] [Bug #1681] Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1681: Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint

6 messages 2009/06/23
[#23999] Re: [Bug #1681] Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/23

Hi,
[#24001] Re: [Bug #1681] Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/24

>> This seems needlessly verbose given that Ruby already knows
[#24030] Re: [Bug #1681] Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/25

Hi,
[#24044] Re: [Bug #1681] Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2009/06/26

We have String#encode (without any arguments), which transcodes to
[#24057] [Bug #1681](Closed) Integer#chr Should Infer Encoding of Given Codepoint — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1681 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#24002] [Bug #1682] Low probability error in gc — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1682: Low probability error in gc

3 messages 2009/06/24
[#24003] [Bug #1682] Low probability error in gc — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1682 has been updated by John Carter.
[#24004] [Bug #1682] Low probability error in gc — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1682 has been updated by John Carter.

[#24005] Object#to: Possible Refinements on the .try_convert Methods for Type Coercion — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

Musing on type conversion, I hit on the idea of an Object#to method

1 message 2009/06/24

[#24006] [Bug #1683] Invalid Source Encodings Raise Vauge Errors — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1683: Invalid Source Encodings Raise Vauge Errors

2 messages 2009/06/24
[#24008] [Bug #1683](Closed) Invalid Source Encodings Raise Vauge Errors — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1683 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#24007] [Bug #1684] ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1 — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1684: ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1

4 messages 2009/06/24
[#24020] [Bug #1684] ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1 — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1684 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24021] Re: [Bug #1684] ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/24

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Roger Pack<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#24367] [Bug #1684](Closed) ruby/rubyw.rc still say 1.9.1 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1684 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#24010] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — B Kelly <redmine@...>

Bug #1685: Some windows unicode path issues remain

26 messages 2009/06/24
[#27696] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...> 2010/01/22

Issue #1685 has been updated by Vit Ondruch.
[#28961] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — B Kelly <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1685 has been updated by B Kelly.
[#28977] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1685 has been updated by Vit Ondruch.
[#28979] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — B Kelly <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1685 has been updated by B Kelly.
[#28984] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/03/25

Hello,
[#29082] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/03/28

Hi,
[#29085] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/03/28

Hello,
[#29173] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/03/31

U.Nakamura wrote:
[#28986] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1685 has been updated by Vit Ondruch.
[#29189] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2010/04/01

Issue #1685 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#29200] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/04/01

Yuki Sonoda wrote:
[#29892] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/04/29

Hi,
[#30004] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/04

Hello,
[#30012] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/05

U.Nakamura wrote:
[#30013] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/05

Hello,
[#30052] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/06

U.Nakamura wrote:
[#30053] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/06

Hello,
[#30054] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/06

Hi,
[#30057] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/06

Hello,
[#30071] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/06

Hi,
[#30077] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/07

Hello,
[#30079] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/07

Hi,
[#30296] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/18

Hi,
[#30302] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/18

Hello,
[#30307] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain — Bill Kelly <billk@...> 2010/05/19

Hi,

[#24017] [Bug #1686] Enumerable#first broken — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1686: Enumerable#first broken

2 messages 2009/06/24
[#24019] [Bug #1686](Closed) Enumerable#first broken — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/24

Issue #1686 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#24018] Net::HTTP Hangs — James Gray <james@...>

I have a weird case that seems to case Net::HTTP to hang in the middle

3 messages 2009/06/24
[#24022] Re: Net::HTTP Hangs — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/24

> 1. I call into Net::HTTP to post some data to the server
[#24023] Re: Net::HTTP Hangs — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/24

On Jun 24, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Roger Pack wrote:

[#24024] [Bug #1687] ARGF.lineno Always Returns 0 for ARGF.chars and ARGF.bytes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1687: ARGF.lineno Always Returns 0 for ARGF.chars and ARGF.bytes

4 messages 2009/06/25
[#24026] Re: [Bug #1687] ARGF.lineno Always Returns 0 for ARGF.chars and ARGF.bytes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/25

Hi,
[#24027] [Bug #1687] ARGF.lineno Always Returns 0 for ARGF.chars and ARGF.bytes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1687 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#24028] [Bug #1687](Closed) ARGF.lineno Always Returns 0 for ARGF.chars and ARGF.bytes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1687 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#24025] [Bug #1688] Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #1688: Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data

5 messages 2009/06/25
[#24034] [Bug #1688] Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1688 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24035] Re: [Bug #1688] Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/25

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Roger Pack<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#24036] Re: [Bug #1688] Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/25

>> do different versions of zlib.dll fix the problem?
[#24037] Re: [Bug #1688] Zlib raises a buffer error when inflating some kinds of data — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/25

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:

[#24029] [Bug #1689] ARGF.binmode Affects Encoding Inconsistently — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1689: ARGF.binmode Affects Encoding Inconsistently

2 messages 2009/06/25
[#24031] [Bug #1689](Closed) ARGF.binmode Affects Encoding Inconsistently — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1689 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#24032] [Bug #1690] backticks don't set $? in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1690: backticks don't set $? in windows

6 messages 2009/06/25
[#24314] [Bug #1690](Rejected) backticks don't set $? in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1690 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#24317] [Bug #1690] backticks don't set $? in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1690 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24318] Re: [Bug #1690] backticks don't set $? in windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/13

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Roger Pack<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#24320] Re: [Bug #1690] backticks don't set $? in windows — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2009/07/14

Hello,
[#25074] [Bug #1690] backticks don't set $? in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/08/24

Issue #1690 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#24033] [Bug #1691] ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1691: ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option

5 messages 2009/06/25
[#24056] [Bug #1691] ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1691 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#24302] [Bug #1691](Rejected) ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1691 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#24303] [Bug #1691] ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1691 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24325] Re: [Bug #1691] ruby --help doesn't display the "skip rubygems" option — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...> 2009/07/14

On 7/13/09 8:35 PM, Roger Pack wrote:

[#24045] YAML omap test and object id collisions — Marcus Rueckert <darix@...>

hi,

1 message 2009/06/26

[#24046] [Bug #1693] ARGF.rewind Doesn't Reset ARGF.lineno — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1693: ARGF.rewind Doesn't Reset ARGF.lineno

3 messages 2009/06/26
[#25370] [Bug #1693] ARGF.rewind Doesn't Reset ARGF.lineno — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/09/04

Issue #1693 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#27099] [Bug #1693] ARGF.rewind Doesn't Reset ARGF.lineno — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/12/08

Issue #1693 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[#24050] 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

I humbly suggest that a prerequisite of 1.9.2 being released is that

6 messages 2009/06/26
[#24052] Re: 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/26

> 1.9 HEAD currently has over 350 failures and 638 errors with RubySpec.
[#24065] Re: 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/28

> Perhaps you could post the various failures somewhere and core people
[#24093] Re: 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/30

To start with, please could I have answers to the following threads?
[#25381] Re: 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/09/04

An update on the remaining 'core' spec failures under 1.9 HEAD:
[#25382] Re: 1.9.2 Should Pass RubySpec Before Release — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/09/04

An update on the remaining 'core' spec failures under 1.9 HEAD:

[#24051] [Bug #1695] String interpolation Issue with escape characters inside an in-string evaluated statement — Jason Pearlman <redmine@...>

Bug #1695: String interpolation Issue with escape characters inside an in-string evaluated statement

4 messages 2009/06/26
[#24053] Re: [Bug #1695] String interpolation Issue with escape characters inside an in-string evaluated statement — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/26

> # Inside a string in #{} - bombs
[#24054] [Bug #1695] String interpolation Issue with escape characters inside an in-string evaluated statement — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1695 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#24055] [Bug #1695] String interpolation Issue with escape characters inside an in-string evaluated statement — Jason Pearlman <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1695 has been updated by Jason Pearlman.

[#24058] [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Steven Hartland <redmine@...>

Bug #1696: http downloads are unuseably slow

19 messages 2009/06/27
[#24059] [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Steven Hartland <redmine@...> 2009/06/27

Issue #1696 has been updated by Steven Hartland.
[#24060] [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Steven Hartland <redmine@...> 2009/06/27

Issue #1696 has been updated by Steven Hartland.
[#24061] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — "Muhammad A. Ali" <oldmoe@...> 2009/06/27

Net/HTTP in 1.9.2dev is already working as you described with two
[#24062] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/27

> Net/HTTP in 1.9.2dev is already working as you described with two
[#24064] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — "Muhammad A. Ali" <oldmoe@...> 2009/06/28

Not sure really, never tested it.
[#24066] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/28

Excerpts from rogerdpack's message of Sun Jun 28 02:29:12 +0300 2009:
[#24071] [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Steven Hartland <redmine@...> 2009/06/28

Issue #1696 has been updated by Steven Hartland.
[#24072] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — "Muhammad A. Ali" <oldmoe@...> 2009/06/28

I believe if the descriptor is set to non blocking then sysread will return
[#24075] [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Steven Hartland <redmine@...> 2009/06/29

Issue #1696 has been updated by Steven Hartland.
[#24081] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/06/29

In article <4a464441bf3f7_13bd3907d016634@redmine.ruby-lang.org>,
[#24082] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/29

Excerpts from Tanaka Akira's message of Mon Jun 29 21:17:58 +0300 2009:
[#24085] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/29

On Jun 29, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#24098] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Young Hyun <youngh@...> 2009/06/30

[#24087] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/29

Excerpts from James Gray's message of Tue Jun 30 00:12:23 +0300 2009:
[#24088] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/29

On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#24090] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/06/30

In article <473C3283-40AA-4079-92C0-31FA11A64BE0@grayproductions.net>,
[#24096] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/30

On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:05 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#24086] Re: [Bug #1696] http downloads are unuseably slow — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/29

On Jun 29, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#24063] [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #1697: Object#<=>

15 messages 2009/06/28
[#24068] [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Rick DeNatale <redmine@...> 2009/06/28

Issue #1697 has been updated by Rick DeNatale.
[#24070] Re: [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/28

Excerpts from Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca's message of Sun Jun 28 16:22:45 +0300 2009:
[#24079] Re: [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/29

On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Eero Saynatkari<ruby-ml@kittensoft.org> wr=
[#24080] Re: [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/29

Excerpts from Marc-Andre's message of Mon Jun 29 15:35:52 +0300 2009:
[#25384] Re: [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/09/04

Hi,
[#26067] [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/10/13

Issue #1697 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26276] [Feature #1697](Closed) Object#<=> — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/10/24

Issue #1697 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#26318] [Feature #1697](Open) Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/10/26

Issue #1697 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26321] Re: [Feature #1697](Open) Object#<=> — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/10/26

Hi,
[#26322] Re: [Feature #1697](Open) Object#<=> — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/10/26

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Mon Oct 26 15:24:12 +0200 2009:
[#26325] [Feature #1697] Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/10/26

Issue #1697 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#27300] [Feature #1697](Assigned) Object#<=> — "ujihisa ." <redmine@...> 2009/12/23

Issue #1697 has been updated by ujihisa ..
[#27302] Re: [Feature #1697](Assigned) Object#<=> — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/24

Hi,
[#27303] [Feature #1697](Closed) Object#<=> — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/12/24

Issue #1697 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#24069] [ANN] RubyInstaller: Building installers story and news — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hey guys,

4 messages 2009/06/28
[#24083] Re: [ANN] RubyInstaller: Building installers story and news — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2009/06/29

> We have preview1!!!
[#24084] Re: [ANN] RubyInstaller: Building installers story and news — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/29

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jon<jon.forums@gmail.com> wrote:
[#24094] Re: [ANN] RubyInstaller: Building installers story and news — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2009/06/30

> The DevKit will be released as a gem.

[#24073] [Bug #1698] Incorrect return value for writer methods. — Mike Ryan <redmine@...>

Bug #1698: Incorrect return value for writer methods.

3 messages 2009/06/28
[#24074] [Bug #1698] Incorrect return value for writer methods. — Mike Ryan <redmine@...> 2009/06/28

Issue #1698 has been updated by Mike Ryan.
[#24076] Re: [Bug #1698] Incorrect return value for writer methods. — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/06/29

[#24077] [Bug #1699] URI::FTP to_s problem after modification — Norihisa Fujita <redmine@...>

Bug #1699: URI::FTP to_s problem after modification

4 messages 2009/06/29
[#27371] [Bug #1699] URI::FTP to_s problem after modification — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/02

Issue #1699 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#29530] [Bug #1699] URI::FTP to_s problem after modification — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/15

Issue #1699 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29531] [Bug #1699](Closed) URI::FTP to_s problem after modification — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/15

Issue #1699 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#24078] [Backport #1700] r22937 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Backport #1700: r22937 should be backported to 1.8.6

2 messages 2009/06/29
[#30398] [Backport #1700](Closed) r22937 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2010/05/24

Issue #1700 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#24091] [Bug #1705] Ruby macros on windows — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...>

Bug #1705: Ruby macros on windows

2 messages 2009/06/30
[#24092] [Bug #1705](Rejected) Ruby macros on windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/30

Issue #1705 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#24095] [Bug #1706] Broken Finalizers — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1706: Broken Finalizers

1 message 2009/06/30

[#24097] [Bug #1707] Proc#call Raises ThreadError on 1.8 HEAD; LocalJumpError on Other Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1707: Proc#call Raises ThreadError on 1.8 HEAD; LocalJumpError on Other Versions

3 messages 2009/06/30
[#24102] Re: [Bug #1707] Proc#call Raises ThreadError on 1.8 HEAD; LocalJumpError on Other Versions — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/07/01

Hi,
[#24103] [Bug #1707](Closed) Proc#call Raises ThreadError on 1.8 HEAD; LocalJumpError on Other Versions — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/07/01

Issue #1707 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#24099] [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1708: require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour

8 messages 2009/06/30
[#24126] [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/07/03

Issue #1708 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#24128] Re: [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/07/03

Hi,
[#24129] [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/07/03

Issue #1708 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#24130] Re: [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/07/03

Hi,
[#24131] [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/07/03

Issue #1708 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#24133] [Bug #1708] require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/07/04

Issue #1708 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#24306] [Bug #1708](Rejected) require 'complex' Causes Unexpected Behaviour — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1708 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#24100] [Bug #1709] Marshal.dump Uses Different Definition of 'Depth' on 1.9? — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1709: Marshal.dump Uses Different Definition of 'Depth' on 1.9?

2 messages 2009/06/30
[#24101] [Bug #1709](Closed) Marshal.dump Uses Different Definition of 'Depth' on 1.9? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/30

Issue #1709 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[ruby-core:23930] [Bug #1657] Windows XP segmentation fault error Ruby 1.9.1 version

From: Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-06-19 11:56:40 UTC
List: ruby-core #23930 
Issue #1657 has been updated by Luis Lavena.


Two questions:

Do you have zlib.dll (renamed from zlib1.dll) installed? If so, which version?
Do you have OpenSSL dependencies properly installed? If so, which version?

Since you're using mswin32 platform, did you follow the instructions here:

http://www.garbagecollect.jp/ruby/mswin32/en/documents/install.html

--
Luis Lavena

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1657

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next