[#28395] [Bug #2830] Some methods raise ArgumentError instead of TypeError — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #2830: Some methods raise ArgumentError instead of TypeError
[#28405] [Feature #2832] Vector#each and Enumerable — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #2832: Vector#each and Enumerable
[#28452] Watched issues on redmine — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...>
Is there a page on redmine that will show me the list of issues that
[#28482] Question on scoped constant resolution Class vs Module — Peter McLain <peter.mclain@...>
I asked this on ruby-talk, but didn't get anywhere. Someone suggested
[#28505] [Bug #2838] Ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) strange round behaviour — P K <redmine@...>
Bug #2838: Ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) strange round behaviour
[#28552] [Bug #2945] Regexp#=== is failed by an exception when the exception is occurred in method_missing — Kenta Murata <redmine@...>
Bug #2945: Regexp#=== is failed by an exception when the exception is occurred in method_missing
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#28561] Ruby::DL vs Ruby::FFI — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>
Ruby.DL and FFI libraries are great for programmers like me who are not internet programmers, but are more interested in scientific and number processing etc.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Aston <blackapache512-ticket@yahoo.com> wrote:
[#28576] "rake not found" error on a rubygems test — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Hi Eric Hodel,
[#28583] build failure on 26861 using msys/mingw — Jon <jon.forums@...>
Can anyone replicate? I've recently updated both binutils and the mingw runtime so this may very well be my configuration.
[#28602] [Bug #2952] Time.strftime format %N — Russell Penney <redmine@...>
Bug #2952: Time.strftime format %N
[#28643] [Bug #2957] IO.print emits field separator after each object, rather than between — Daniel Kelley <redmine@...>
Bug #2957: IO.print emits field separator after each object, rather than between
[#28665] [ANN] 1.9.2 release plan — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Hi,
[#28686] trunk (26947) build fail with msys/mingw/vista — Jon <jon.forums@...>
I get the following build failure when msysgit's "c:\git\cmd" dir is on PATH.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Jon <jon.forums@gmail.com> wrote:
[#28712] When a trace hook raises an exception, should it terminate the program? — Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...>
In Ruby 1.8 and the Ruby 1.9 trunk when running a trace hook that raises an
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@rubyforge.org> wrote:
Let me clarify a bit because I think some of the facts (some by me) may have
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@rubyforge.org> wrote:
[#28724] [Feature:trunk] Array#repeated_(permutation|combination) — "KISHIMOTO, Makoto" <ksmakoto@...4u.or.jp>
New methods Array#repeated_(permutation|combination).
[#28735] [Bug #2982] Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>
Bug #2982: Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline
Issue #2982 has been updated by caleb clausen.
Hi,
[#28783] [Feature #2065] An ancestors iterator — Simon Chiang <redmine@...>
Issue #2065 has been updated by Simon Chiang.
Hi,
[#28837] [Bug #2993] Module#instance_methods' flag seems to be ignored in singleton classes — Xavier Noria <redmine@...>
Bug #2993: Module#instance_methods' flag seems to be ignored in singleton classes
[#28859] st.c: pool allocator for tables and entries — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all,
[#28865] Can DRb be used across a fork() — Chris Schlaeger <cschlaeger@...>
I'm trying to use DRb to communicate between a parent and child
[#28871] WeakRef extending Delegator is a bug waiting to happen? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
Hopefully this doesn't contradict my other email too much :)
[#28902] [Bug #2998] gets fails in mingw — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #2998: gets fails in mingw
[#28907] [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>
Bug #3000: Open SSL Segfaults
Issue #3000 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#28924] [Bug #3005] Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Sebastian YEPES <redmine@...>
Bug #3005: Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0
[#28954] [Feature #3010] slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1 — Miao Jiang <redmine@...>
Feature #3010: slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1
[#29019] [Bug #3015] NetBSD vs test/dl — Michael Graff <redmine@...>
Bug #3015: NetBSD vs test/dl
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:49:59AM +0900, Michael Graff wrote:
[#29031] [Feature #1395](Open) Steppable Kernel::eval — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>
Issue #1395 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29045] [Feature #3021] Array#product should accept a block. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #3021: Array#product should accept a block.
[#29092] merged psych to trunk — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Hey everyone,
[#29118] [Bug #3051] psych is too osx-specifc — Michael Graff <redmine@...>
Bug #3051: psych is too osx-specifc
[#29128] [Bug #3052] DRb::start_service fails to detect used port — Chris Schlaeger <redmine@...>
Bug #3052: DRb::start_service fails to detect used port
Issue #3052 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29131] [trunk:bug] Many rubygems tests fail with psych tests. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
Many rubygems tests fail with psych tests.
(2010/03/30 17:55), Tanaka Akira wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:13:32PM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#29161] [Bug #3058] Inconsistent eol conversion of IO#read on Windows — Heesob Park <redmine@...>
Bug #3058: Inconsistent eol conversion of IO#read on Windows
[#29167] [Feature #3067] complex.c : Question: why Complex#~ is disabled? It's in the doc — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
Feature #3067: complex.c : Question: why Complex#~ is disabled? It's in the doc
[#29179] [Bug #3071] Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Bug #3071: Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych
Doesn't this mean the the RubyGems codevase would now be forked
Issue #3071 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#29186] [Bug #3072] Classes Inheriting from Data — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #3072: Classes Inheriting from Data
[ruby-core:29082] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain
Hi,
U.Nakamura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In message "[ruby-core:28979] [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain"
> on Mar.25,2010 19:10:35, <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>> I wonder if there is a reason this should not be merged
>> into trunk ASAP?
>
> Because I'm too busy to test this branch well :(
>
> Endoh-san says that the feature freeze is March 31.
> Then, it is necessary to complete merging it until then,
> if we want to include it in 1.9.2 release...
>
> win32-unicode-branch has not contained the globbing features
> yet, as Vit pointed in [ruby-core:28977] (thank you, Vit).
> However, because it relates to the command line interpretation,
> it might be difficult to implement until March 31.
I understand how this might be considered a 'feature', but
I think it is also possible to consider it a bug fix.
1.9.1 was supposed to support unicode path on win32, but
this was deferred to 1.9.2.
Nevertheless, I quote matz from November, 2008:
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: [ruby-core:20109] Re: 1.9, encoding & win32 wide char support"
> on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:26:53 +0900, "Bill Kelly" <billk@cts.com> writes:
>
> |> Does anyone have information as to the current status of
> |> adding Unicode-savvy path handling to 1.9 ruby?
> |
> |Ugh. Sorry, I mean of course: Unicode-savvy path handling
> |on *win32* ruby 1.9.
>
> Every path encoding is UTF-8 and converted to UTF-16 internally. If
> there's something still use *A functions, it will eventually replaced
> by *W functions. In short, if you're using UTF-8 for your program
> encoding, you should not see any problem (if you do, it's a bug).
>
> matz.
I don't know if matz has changed his mind, but; personally I would
like to consider it a bug that ruby 1.9.x fails for unicode paths
on windows.
> Should we wait until all functions are covered, or merge the
> current one?
>
> Summary:
> (1) need the decision whether merging it or not
> (2) need testers :)
> (3) need the worker(s) to make the patch to trunk
(1) Please, yes. Let us merge. 93.75% is better than current 6.25% coverage.
(2) I hope to contribute unicode_path unit-tests. (such as in bootstraptest/)
(3) I would like to contribute to the patch if my efforts can be useful.
(diffs on io.c, file.c, and dir.c look pretty straightforward.)
(diffs on win32/win32.c look more difficult, but I can attempt.)
Regards,
Bill