[#28687] [Bug #2973] rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213 — rudolf gavlas <redmine@...>

Bug #2973: rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213

10 messages 2010/03/16

[#28735] [Bug #2982] Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2982: Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline

16 messages 2010/03/18

[#28736] [Bug #2983] Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3) — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2983: Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3)

10 messages 2010/03/18

[#28907] [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>

Bug #3000: Open SSL Segfaults

19 messages 2010/03/23

[#28924] [Bug #3005] Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Sebastian YEPES <redmine@...>

Bug #3005: Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0

10 messages 2010/03/24

[#28954] [Feature #3010] slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1 — Miao Jiang <redmine@...>

Feature #3010: slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1

15 messages 2010/03/24

[#29179] [Bug #3071] Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3071: Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych

10 messages 2010/03/31

[ruby-core:29085] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain

From: "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Date: 2010-03-28 14:57:38 UTC
List: ruby-core #29085
Hello,

In message "[ruby-core:29082] Re: [Bug #1685] Some windows unicode path issues remain"
    on Mar.28,2010 16:51:26, <billk@cts.com> wrote:
> I understand how this might be considered a 'feature', but
> I think it is also possible to consider it a bug fix.

Hmm, it has a point in it.
The branch manager should judge whether this change is a bug fix or
feature change.
How do you think, Yugui-san?


> > Summary:
> >   (1) need the decision whether merging it or not
> >   (2) need testers :)
> >   (3) need the worker(s) to make the patch to trunk
> 
> (1) Please, yes. Let us merge. 93.75% is better than current 6.25% coverage.
> (2) I hope to contribute unicode_path unit-tests. (such as in bootstraptest/)
> (3) I would like to contribute to the patch if my efforts can be useful.
>     (diffs on io.c, file.c, and dir.c look pretty straightforward.)
>     (diffs on win32/win32.c look more difficult, but I can attempt.)

I'm very glad to hear your offer of cooperation.
Thank you!


Regards,
-- 
U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp>


In This Thread