ruby-core

[#23657] [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1550: String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes

13 messages 2009/06/01

[#23662] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/01

Hi,

[#23663] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — James Gray <james@...> 2009/06/01

On Jun 1, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#23664] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/01

Hi,

[#23671] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/02

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=

[#23707] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/04

matz,

[#23714] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/05

Hi,

[#23665] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/01

I couldn't agree more! I'd find it most surprising if

[#23666] Re: [Bug #1550] String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/01

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=

[#23672] [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/02

Issue #1550 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23675] Re: [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Alex <imphasing@...> 2009/06/02

This change seems to break the build on my machine:

[#23681] Re: [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/03

Hi,

[#23689] Re: [Bug #1550](Closed) String#lstrip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Alex <imphasing@...> 2009/06/03

[alex@platypus ruby]$ cat rbconfig.rb

[#23658] [Bug #1551] String#slice! Raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1551: String#slice! Raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes

2 messages 2009/06/01

[#23694] [Bug #1551](Closed) String#slice! Raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1551 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23659] [Bug #1552] String#strip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1552: String#strip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes

2 messages 2009/06/01

[#23695] [Bug #1552](Closed) String#strip! raises RuntimeError on Frozen String Despite Making No Changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1552 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23660] [Bug #1553] String#index Ignores Out-of-Range Offset When Given Regexp Matching the Empty String — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1553: String#index Ignores Out-of-Range Offset When Given Regexp Matching the Empty String

2 messages 2009/06/01

[#24324] [Bug #1553](Closed) String#index Ignores Out-of-Range Offset When Given Regexp Matching the Empty String — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/07/14

Issue #1553 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23661] [Bug #1554] Enumerator#first & #take should consume only what is needed [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1554: Enumerator#first & #take should consume only what is needed [patch]

2 messages 2009/06/01

[#23680] [Bug #1554](Closed) Enumerator#first & #take should consume only what is needed [patch] — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1554 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23668] [Bug #1555] Inaccessible 'io' parameter in Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.initialize(x,y,io) — Howard Kapustein <redmine@...>

Bug #1555: Inaccessible 'io' parameter in Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.initialize(x,y,io)

1 message 2009/06/02

[#23670] [Bug #1557] Memory leak in DRb — Thibaut Neiger <redmine@...>

Bug #1557: Memory leak in DRb

3 messages 2009/06/02

[#23691] [Bug #1557] Memory leak in DRb — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1557 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23690] [Bug #1557] Memory leak in DRb — Thibaut Neiger <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1557 has been updated by Thibaut Neiger.

[#23674] [Bug #1558] test timeout issues in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1558: test timeout issues in windows

5 messages 2009/06/02

[#29552] [Bug #1558](Feedback) test timeout issues in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1558 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#30128] [Bug #1558] test timeout issues in windows — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/10

Issue #1558 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30131] [Bug #1558] test timeout issues in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/05/10

Issue #1558 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#30439] [Bug #1558](Closed) test timeout issues in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/26

Issue #1558 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23682] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — James Zhang <redmine@...>

Bug #1559: ERB single line comment does not work

6 messages 2009/06/03

[#23684] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1559 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.

[#24714] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — Johannes Fahrenkrug <redmine@...> 2009/08/03

Issue #1559 has been updated by Johannes Fahrenkrug.

[#24926] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — khaled alhabache <redmine@...> 2009/08/15

Issue #1559 has been updated by khaled alhabache.

[#29269] [Bug #1559] ERB single line comment does not work — Robin Salkeld <redmine@...> 2010/04/06

Issue #1559 has been updated by Robin Salkeld.

[#29512] [Bug #1559](Rejected) ERB single line comment does not work — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #1559 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23683] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — David Cuadrado <redmine@...>

Bug #1560: multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression)

6 messages 2009/06/03

[#27872] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #1560 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#27955] Re: [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/29

Hi,

[#28675] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/03/15

Issue #1560 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#30219] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #1560 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30224] [Bug #1560] multi core operations are slower on trunk (possible regression) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #1560 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23685] [Backport #1562] r22674 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Backport #1562: r22674 should be backported to 1.8.6

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23686] [Bug #1563] Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Bug #1563: Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23687] [Backport #1563] Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Issue #1563 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23693] [Backport #1563](Closed) Bigdecimal extension does not compile with debug build — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...>

Issue #1563 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23696] [Bug #1565] iconv self-destructed — Mark Eriksen <redmine@...>

Bug #1565: iconv self-destructed

2 messages 2009/06/03

[#23711] [Bug #1565] iconv self-destructed — Mark Eriksen <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1565 has been updated by Mark Eriksen.

[#23697] [Bug #1566] sprintf with %e or %E Format Specifer Incorrectly Capitalises Inf and NaN — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1566: sprintf with %e or %E Format Specifer Incorrectly Capitalises Inf and NaN

2 messages 2009/06/03

[#25462] [Bug #1566] sprintf with %e or %E Format Specifer Incorrectly Capitalises Inf and NaN — "m ." <redmine@...> 2009/09/07

Issue #1566 has been updated by m ..

[#23698] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #1567: socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures

5 messages 2009/06/03

[#23710] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1567 has been updated by Mike Pomraning.

[#27873] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #1567 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#29385] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1567 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30512] [Bug #1567] socket.c silently discards internal listen(2) failures — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #1567 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23699] Change in How $~ is Restored After String#sub/String#gsub with a ?Block — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

Hi,

1 message 2009/06/03

[#23700] Standard Ruby bytecode — Ioannis Nousias <s0238762@...>

I came across this post:

4 messages 2009/06/04

[#23701] Re: Standard Ruby bytecode — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/04

Excerpts from Ioannis Nousias's message of Thu Jun 04 12:11:06 +0300 2009:

[#23709] Re: Standard Ruby bytecode — Ioannis Nousias <s0238762@...> 2009/06/04

Eero and Rick,

[#23704] Re: Standard Ruby bytecode — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/06/04

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org> wrote:

[#23702] [Bug #1568] Revision 23639 build error OSX 10.5.7 — Mike Stok <redmine@...>

Bug #1568: Revision 23639 build error OSX 10.5.7

2 messages 2009/06/04

[#23708] [Bug #1568](Closed) Revision 23639 build error OSX 10.5.7 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/04

Issue #1568 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23703] [Bug #1569] gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Marc Paterno <redmine@...>

Bug #1569: gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault.

4 messages 2009/06/04

[#23705] Re: [Bug #1569] gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/04

gem update --system does seem to work with my p129

[#27877] [Bug #1569] gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #1569 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#29388] [Bug #1569](Feedback) gem update --system crashes ruby with a segmentation fault. — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1569 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23706] Inconsistent behavior on 1.8 and 1.9 of String#[]= with single Fixnum argument — brian ford <brixen@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2009/06/04

[#23712] Re: Inconsistent behavior on 1.8 and 1.9 of String#[]= with single Fixnum argument — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/05

That's a tricky question!

[#23713] [Bug]Is this a bug about thread_reset_event_flags? — "Tetsu Soh" <tetsu.soh.dev@...>

Hello,

1 message 2009/06/05

[#23715] [Bug #1571] Hash Methods Behaving Inconsistently with Frozen Hashes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1571: Hash Methods Behaving Inconsistently with Frozen Hashes

2 messages 2009/06/05

[#23751] [Bug #1571](Closed) Hash Methods Behaving Inconsistently with Frozen Hashes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/08

Issue #1571 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23716] [Bug #1572] Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching — Thomas Martitz <redmine@...>

Bug #1572: Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching

3 messages 2009/06/05

[#23719] [Bug #1572](Rejected) Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1572 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23731] Re: [Bug #1572] Regex range: upper range limit apparently not applied on digit matching — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,

[#23717] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Morris Brodersen <redmine@...>

Bug #1573: $0 behaves unexpectedly

7 messages 2009/06/05

[#23718] Re: [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/05

Excerpts from Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca's message of Fri Jun 05 19:07:18 +0300 2009:

[#23720] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Morris Brodersen <redmine@...> 2009/06/05

Issue #1573 has been updated by Morris Brodersen.

[#29403] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/10

Issue #1573 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#29482] Re: [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/04/12

Hi,

[#30584] [Bug #1573] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/06/04

Issue #1573 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30591] [Bug #1573][Closed] $0 behaves unexpectedly — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/06/05

Issue #1573 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23721] [Bug #1574] test_systemcallerror_eq(TestDelegateClass) on windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1574: test_systemcallerror_eq(TestDelegateClass) on windows

2 messages 2009/06/05

[#29781] [Bug #1574](Closed) test_systemcallerror_eq(TestDelegateClass) on windows — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/04/24

Issue #1574 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#23722] [Bug #1575] TestEtc failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1575: TestEtc failures in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05

[#30011] [Bug #1575](Closed) TestEtc failures in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/05/05

Issue #1575 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23723] [Bug #1576] TestFile failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1576: TestFile failures in windows

4 messages 2009/06/05

[#30174] [Bug #1576](Assigned) TestFile failures in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/12

Issue #1576 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#30204] [Bug #1576](Closed) TestFile failures in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #1576 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#30188] [Bug #1576] TestFile failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/05/12

Issue #1576 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23724] [Bug #1577] testFileUtils failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1577: testFileUtils failure in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05

[#29995] [Bug #1577](Closed) testFileUtils failure in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/05/04

Issue #1577 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23725] [Bug #1578] TestFloat failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1578: TestFloat failure in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05

[#29547] [Bug #1578](Closed) TestFloat failure in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1578 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23726] [Bug #1579] TestGDBM failure in mingw — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1579: TestGDBM failure in mingw

2 messages 2009/06/05

[#29551] [Bug #1579](Third Party's Issue) TestGDBM failure in mingw — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1579 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23727] [Bug #1580] TestIOScanF failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1580: TestIOScanF failure in windows

4 messages 2009/06/05

[#23734] Re: [Bug #1580] TestIOScanF failure in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,

[#23810] [Bug #1580](Closed) TestIOScanF failure in windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1580 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23826] Re: [Bug #1580](Closed) TestIOScanF failure in windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> Issue #1580 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23728] [Bug #1581] Test_IO17M failure in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1581: Test_IO17M failure in windows

2 messages 2009/06/05

[#29548] [Bug #1581] Test_IO17M failure in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1581 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23729] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1583: Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError?

14 messages 2009/06/05

[#27283] [Bug #1583](Closed) Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/12/22

Issue #1583 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23816] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#23733] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,

[#23735] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/06

Hi,

[#23743] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#23744] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — daz <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2009/06/07

Akira Tanaka wrote:

[#23746] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/07

Hi,

[#23748] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/07

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Sun Jun 07 17:07:06 +0300 2009:

[#23752] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...> 2009/06/08

On 2009/06/08 0:27, Eero Saynatkari wrote:

[#23756] Re: [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/06/08

I'd like to second long explicit names. Maybe it's because I'm not

[#23747] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#24043] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1583 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#26995] [Bug #1583] Time + String no Longer Raises TypeError? — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/12/02

Issue #1583 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23730] SVN for committers seems to be down — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

$ svn info

1 message 2009/06/05

[#23732] Fwd: ruby_frame in 1.8 is what in 1.9? — Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@...>

So I have some C++ extension code that nicely uses ruby_frame->orig_func and

1 message 2009/06/06

[#23736] [Bug #1584] return from lambda within 2 procs freezes — Glen Gerstman <redmine@...>

Bug #1584: return from lambda within 2 procs freezes

3 messages 2009/06/06

[#29390] [Bug #1584](Closed) return from lambda within 2 procs freezes — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1584 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23855] [Bug #1584] return from lambda within 2 procs freezes — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1584 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#23737] [Bug #1585] general auto string literal concatenation — Glen Gerstman <redmine@...>

Bug #1585: general auto string literal concatenation

2 messages 2009/06/06

[#28989] [Feature #1585] general auto string literal concatenation — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1585 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23738] Ducktyping interface — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

Matz,

6 messages 2009/06/07

[#23739] Re: Ducktyping interface — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/06/07

I should add that further examination reveals that people who make proxy

[#23788] Re: Ducktyping interface — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/06/10

Hi,

[#23745] Re: Ducktyping interface — Stephen Sykes <sdsykes@...> 2009/06/07

I would hope that it's a spec.

[#23789] Re: Ducktyping interface — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/06/10

Hi,

[#23758] Re: Ducktyping interface — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/06/08

Hi,

[#23740] [Bug #1586] Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...>

Bug #1586: Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored

3 messages 2009/06/07

[#23741] [Feature #1586] Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored — Rick DeNatale <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1586 has been updated by Rick DeNatale.

[#23742] [Feature #1586] Including a module already present in ancestors should not be ignored — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2009/06/07

Issue #1586 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.

[#23749] idLAST_TOKEN definition in '.../template/id.h.tmpl' — "daz (c)" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>

I can't see idLAST_TOKEN in use anywhere in the source distribution

2 messages 2009/06/07

[#23750] Re: idLAST_TOKEN definition in '.../template/id.h.tmpl' — "daz (c)" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2009/06/07

or, strictly ...

[#23753] [Bug #1587] Problem with string sharing — Quet Zal <redmine@...>

Bug #1587: Problem with string sharing

4 messages 2009/06/08

[#23754] Re: [Bug #1587] Problem with string sharing — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/08

Excerpts from redmine message on Mon Jun 08 15:07:21 +0300 2009:

[#23755] Re: [Bug #1587] Problem with string sharing — Quet Zal <i.am.quetz@...> 2009/06/08

Here's even more simplified example how to reproduce this bug. (First one

[#29973] [Bug #1587](Closed) Problem with string sharing — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #1587 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#23757] [Backport #1589] Backport BigDecimal fixes — Kirk Haines <redmine@...>

Backport #1589: Backport BigDecimal fixes

2 messages 2009/06/08

[#23786] [Backport #1589](Closed) Backport BigDecimal fixes — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2009/06/10

Issue #1589 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#23759] [Bug #1590] Unexpected behaviour of Array.| — Jens Kanschik <redmine@...>

Bug #1590: Unexpected behaviour of Array.|

1 message 2009/06/08

[#23766] [Bug #1591] DATA handle unusable in required modules — Chris Davaz <redmine@...>

Bug #1591: DATA handle unusable in required modules

1 message 2009/06/09

[#23767] [Bug #1592] [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue — Joseph Pecoraro <redmine@...>

Bug #1592: [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue

3 messages 2009/06/09

[#24038] [Bug #1592] [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue — Joseph Pecoraro <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1592 has been updated by Joseph Pecoraro.

[#24039] [Bug #1592](Closed) [Docs] Dir#glob Style Issue — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/25

Issue #1592 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23768] [Bug #1593] Exception backtrace within eval lacks topmost function — Chris Howlett <redmine@...>

Bug #1593: Exception backtrace within eval lacks topmost function

1 message 2009/06/09

[#23769] [Bug #1594] Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows — Barry DeZonia <redmine@...>

Bug #1594: Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows

3 messages 2009/06/09

[#23771] [Bug #1594] Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows — Barry DeZonia <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1594 has been updated by Barry DeZonia.

[#23774] [Bug #1594] Dir.foreach() mistakenly throws EINVAL in Windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1594 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23770] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Robert Gonzalez <redmine@...>

Bug #1595: rake unusable on windows install

10 messages 2009/06/09

[#23772] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1595 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23773] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2009/06/09

SGF2ZSB5b3UgY2hlY2tlZCB0aGUgY21kIGZpbGU/IEl0IG1pZ2h0IGJlIHBvaW50aW5nIHRvIGFu

[#23775] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2009/06/09

UGxlYXNlIGRpc3JlZ2FyZCB0aGlzLCBJIGRpZG4ndCByZWFkIHRoZSBvcmlnaW5hbCB2ZXJ5IHdl

[#23776] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/09

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Robert Gonzalez<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrot=

[#23779] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Robert Gonzalez <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1595 has been updated by Robert Gonzalez.

[#23782] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2009/06/10

[#23780] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Robert Gonzalez <redmine@...> 2009/06/09

Issue #1595 has been updated by Robert Gonzalez.

[#24436] [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Pat Parslow <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1595 has been updated by Pat Parslow.

[#24438] Re: [Bug #1595] rake unusable on windows install — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/18

On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Pat Parslow<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#23781] [HEADSUP] RubyGems 1.3.4 in trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

I have updated RubyGems to 1.3.4 r2223

2 messages 2009/06/09

[#23823] Re: [HEADSUP] RubyGems 1.3.4 in trunk — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Eric Hodel<drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#23784] Observable on Set? — James Coglan <jcoglan@...>

Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage

2 messages 2009/06/10

[#23785] Re: Observable on Set? — James Coglan <jcoglan@...> 2009/06/10

2009/6/10 James Coglan <jcoglan@googlemail.com>

[#23793] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — okkez _ <redmine@...>

Feature #1599: ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message

6 messages 2009/06/11

[#23794] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1599 has been updated by Lin Jen-Shin.

[#23795] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1599 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23814] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1599 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#28854] [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/22

Issue #1599 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#29077] Re: [Feature #1599] ruby test_foo.rb --help do not show help message — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/03/28

[#23796] [Bug #1602] TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1602: TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole)

3 messages 2009/06/11

[#29550] [Bug #1602](Assigned) TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1602 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#29563] [Bug #1602](Closed) TestInvokeVerb failure mingw (win32ole) — Masaki Suketa <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1602 has been updated by Masaki Suketa.

[#23797] [Bug #1603] TestOpen3 failure (windows) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1603: TestOpen3 failure (windows)

3 messages 2009/06/11

[#29878] [Bug #1603] TestOpen3 failure (windows) — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/04/29

Issue #1603 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#29879] [Bug #1603](Closed) TestOpen3 failure (windows) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/29

Issue #1603 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23798] [Bug #1604] TestPath failure (mingw) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1604: TestPath failure (mingw)

2 messages 2009/06/11

[#29549] [Bug #1604](Closed) TestPath failure (mingw) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/16

Issue #1604 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23799] [Bug #1605] TestProcess failure — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1605: TestProcess failure

2 messages 2009/06/11

[#30272] [Bug #1605](Closed) TestProcess failure — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/17

Issue #1605 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23800] [Bug #1606] TestRequire failure — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1606: TestRequire failure

3 messages 2009/06/11

[#24944] [Bug #1606] TestRequire failure — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/08/17

Issue #1606 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#26849] [Bug #1606](Rejected) TestRequire failure — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1606 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23801] [Bug #1607] TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1607: TestSocket failures

4 messages 2009/06/11

[#24384] [Bug #1607] TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1607 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23803] [Bug #1607] TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1607 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#26846] [Bug #1607](Closed) TestSocket failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1607 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23802] [Bug #1608] einval in getsockname (windows) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1608: einval in getsockname (windows)

3 messages 2009/06/11

[#24414] [Bug #1608] einval in getsockname (windows) — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1608 has been updated by Heesob Park.

[#24423] [Bug #1608](Closed) einval in getsockname (windows) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1608 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23804] [Bug #1609] inetv6 failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1609: inetv6 failures in windows

3 messages 2009/06/11

[#23819] Re: [Bug #1609] inetv6 failures in windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> 117) Error:

[#26847] [Bug #1609](Closed) inetv6 failures in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1609 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23805] [Bug #1610] BasicSocket errors (doze) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1610: BasicSocket errors (doze)

2 messages 2009/06/11

[#26848] [Bug #1610] BasicSocket errors (doze) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1610 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23806] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1611: win32ole errors from make test all

5 messages 2009/06/11

[#24385] [Bug #1611](Closed) win32ole errors from make test all — Masaki Suketa <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1611 has been updated by Masaki Suketa.

[#24386] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Masaki Suketa <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1611 has been updated by Masaki Suketa.

[#23809] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/06/11

Issue #1611 has been updated by Heesob Park.

[#24366] [Bug #1611] win32ole errors from make test all — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1611 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23807] suggestion for string concatenation [RCR] — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Currently with Ruby if you want to concatenate objects to a string,

2 messages 2009/06/11

[#23808] Re: suggestion for string concatenation [RCR] — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/11

Hi,

[#23813] [Bug #1613] Segfault due to stack overflow — Robert Dober <redmine@...>

Bug #1613: Segfault due to stack overflow

4 messages 2009/06/12

[#23958] [Bug #1613](Closed) Segfault due to stack overflow — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1613 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23890] Re: [Bug #1613] Segfault due to stack overflow — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/17

Hi,

[#23817] Re: [Bug #1613] Segfault due to stack overflow — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> When using a closure or param to cache values for recursive calls, the stack overflow is not caught but segfaults.

[#23815] inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...>

Hello,

9 messages 2009/06/12

[#23818] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> This works on Linux by persisting socket.fileno from the parent process a=

[#23820] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Knutaf H <knutaf@...> 2009/06/12

Well, I'm already not exactly using pure Ruby, since I'm wrapping

[#23822] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> Besides that, I think using WSADuplicateSocket will suffer from the

[#23837] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...> 2009/06/13

I tried that with both the HANDLE value and with an fd value that I

[#23838] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/13

> I tried that with both the HANDLE value and with an fd value that I

[#23841] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...> 2009/06/13

I don't think I gave enough context...

[#23871] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — "Knutaf" <knutaf@...> 2009/06/16

Any other data I should present?

[#23874] Re: inheriting socket in child process on native Windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/16

> Any other data I should present?

[#23821] [Bug #1616] Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError — Michael Fellinger <redmine@...>

Bug #1616: Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError

3 messages 2009/06/12

[#23825] Re: [Bug #1616] Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/12

> =A0 =A0# Another name for Timeout::Error, defined for backwards compatibi=

[#23830] [Bug #1616](Closed) Net::BufferedIO tries to raise Timeout::TimeoutError — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1616 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23824] [Bug #1617] Exception Raised by Uncaught Throw (Disagreement Between Documentation and Reality) — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1617: Exception Raised by Uncaught Throw (Disagreement Between Documentation and Reality)

2 messages 2009/06/12

[#23829] [Bug #1617](Closed) Exception Raised by Uncaught Throw (Disagreement Between Documentation and Reality) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1617 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23827] [Bug #1618] Kernel.catch without Arguments — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1618: Kernel.catch without Arguments

2 messages 2009/06/12

[#23831] [Bug #1618](Closed) Kernel.catch without Arguments — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1618 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23828] [Bug #1619] [PATCH] Kernel.local_variables Documentation: Symbols are Returned on 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1619: [PATCH] Kernel.local_variables Documentation: Symbols are Returned on 1.9

2 messages 2009/06/12

[#23832] [Bug #1619](Closed) [PATCH] Kernel.local_variables Documentation: Symbols are Returned on 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/12

Issue #1619 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23833] [Bug #1620] [PATCH] Kernel.require Normalises Paths in 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1620: [PATCH] Kernel.require Normalises Paths in 1.9

2 messages 2009/06/13

[#23895] [Bug #1620](Closed) [PATCH] Kernel.require Normalises Paths in 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1620 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23834] [Bug #1621] autoload Doesn't Call #to_path on non-String Argument — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1621: autoload Doesn't Call #to_path on non-String Argument

2 messages 2009/06/13

[#23836] [Bug #1621](Closed) autoload Doesn't Call #to_path on non-String Argument — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/13

Issue #1621 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23835] [Bug #1622] [PATCH] Module.autoload Documentation Fix — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1622: [PATCH] Module.autoload Documentation Fix

2 messages 2009/06/13

[#23894] [Bug #1622](Closed) [PATCH] Module.autoload Documentation Fix — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1622 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23839] [Bug #1624] [PATCH] Documentation for File#size — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1624: [PATCH] Documentation for File#size

2 messages 2009/06/13

[#23846] [Bug #1624](Closed) [PATCH] Documentation for File#size — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1624 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23840] [Bug #1625] Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1625: Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option

3 messages 2009/06/13

[#29329] [Bug #1625](Feedback) Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1625 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30510] [Bug #1625][Closed] Segfault when NoMethodError is Raised Under IRB with Tracer Option — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #1625 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23842] request for updated ri/rdoc on 1.8.7 branch — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

would it be possible to get a newer version of ri/rdoc installed on

3 messages 2009/06/13

[#23865] Re: request for updated ri/rdoc on 1.8.7 branch — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2009/06/15

On Jun 13, 2009, at 13:27, Roger Pack wrote:

[#24291] Re: request for updated ri/rdoc on 1.8.7 branch — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/12

>> would it be possible to get a newer version of ri/rdoc installed on

[#23843] Differences in Rational Between 1.8 and 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

I'm writing RubySpec specifications for Rational in 1.9. Enumerated

3 messages 2009/06/13

[#23856] Re: Differences in Rational Between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/14

Hi,

[#23857] Re: Differences in Rational Between 1.8 and 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/15

> All of above are intentional. =C2=A0No need to file bug. =C2=A0Most of th=

[#23844] [Bug #1626] Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1626: Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments

3 messages 2009/06/13

[#27220] [Bug #1626](Closed) Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/12/19

Issue #1626 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#27221] [Bug #1626] Set Raises NoMethodError for Non-Enumerable Arguments — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/12/19

Issue #1626 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23845] [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1627: Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths

5 messages 2009/06/13

[#23847] [Bug #1627](Closed) Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1627 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23848] [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/06/14

Issue #1627 has been updated by Heesob Park.

[#23896] Re: [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/17

Hi,

[#23897] Re: [Bug #1627] Kernel.require Should Canonicalise Paths — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/17

Hi,

[#23849] [Bug #1629] [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Markus Fischer <redmine@...>

Bug #1629: [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults

4 messages 2009/06/14

[#23861] Re: [Bug #1629] [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/15

> C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\mfischer>irb

[#23862] Re: [Bug #1629] [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2009/06/15

2009/6/15 Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com>:

[#29330] [Bug #1629](Rejected) [Segfault] z = Zlib::GzipReader.new segfaults — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1629 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23850] instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — apeiros <apeiros@...>

Hi folks

10 messages 2009/06/14

[#23877] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2009/06/16

Hi,

[#23879] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — apeiros <apeiros@...> 2009/06/16

Am 16.06.2009 um 22:12 schrieb Yusuke ENDOH:

[#23880] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Florian Gilcher <flo@...> 2009/06/16

[#23904] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — apeiros <apeiros@...> 2009/06/17

Am 17.06.2009 um 00:01 schrieb Florian Gilcher:

[#23905] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Florian Gilcher <flo@...> 2009/06/17

[#24334] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2009/07/15

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Florian Gilcher<flo@andersground.net> wrote:

[#24524] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/23

> I for one would support instance_exec getting backported to Ruby.

[#23866] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/06/16

[#23870] Re: instance_eval no longer yielding self in ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/16

Hi,

[#23851] [Bug #1631] Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1631: Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable

3 messages 2009/06/14

[#29331] [Bug #1631] Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1631 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30509] [Bug #1631][Closed] Kernel.require Gives Misleading Error Message When File is Unreadable — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/30

Issue #1631 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23852] [Bug #1632] ARGF's Iterators Return nill Instead of self — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1632: ARGF's Iterators Return nill Instead of self

2 messages 2009/06/14

[#23860] [Bug #1632](Closed) ARGF's Iterators Return nill Instead of self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/15

Issue #1632 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23853] [Bug #1633] ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1633: ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9

4 messages 2009/06/14

[#23867] [Bug #1633](Closed) ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/06/16

Issue #1633 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23868] Re: [Bug #1633] ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/16

Hi,

[#24591] [Backport #1633](Assigned) ARGF#close and ARGF#skip are Often Fatal on 1.9 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/07/29

Issue #1633 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23854] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1635: ARGF Has No Documentation

7 messages 2009/06/14

[#24049] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/26

Issue #1635 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#23891] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/17

Issue #1635 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#23858] Re: [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/06/15

Hi,

[#24656] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/08/01

Issue #1635 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#25430] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/09/05

Issue #1635 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#25433] [Bug #1635] ARGF Has No Documentation — Nobuhiro IMAI <redmine@...> 2009/09/06

Issue #1635 has been updated by Nobuhiro IMAI.

[#23859] [Bug #1636] Rational#coerce(Rational) Raises TypeError — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1636: Rational#coerce(Rational) Raises TypeError

2 messages 2009/06/15

[#23884] [Bug #1636](Closed) Rational#coerce(Rational) Raises TypeError — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/06/16

Issue #1636 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.

[#23864] [Bug #1639] YAML.load fails on some Regexps — viktor tron <redmine@...>

Bug #1639: YAML.load fails on some Regexps

1 message 2009/06/15