From: luke gruber <luke.gru@...>
Date: 2011-08-24T10:39:17+09:00
Subject: Re: Gritty Details of super()

>Therefore, your statement here:

---mine
> the anonymous superclass that
> proxies the module (ASCTPTM...hehe)
> does not proxy the singleton methods of the module.
---mine (Luke)

>is non-sensical because a regular class (or an anonymous class) never
>contains the singleton methods.

>7stud

Right, what I should have said, and what I really meant (that's my story 
and I'm sticking to it...) is that the ... ASCTPTM ... has a singleton 
class, and that singleton class doesn't proxy the included module's 
singleton class for some unknown reason. Maybe it's because anonymous 
classes can't have singleton classes after all. Who knows about the 
implementation, but that's probably the easiest way for me to 
remember/deal with it.

Anyway, thanks for the thoughts.

Now if I could only figure out how to edit the name of this thread...

-Luke

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.