From: Aaron Samuel Date: 2011-08-26T09:56:53+09:00 Subject: Re: Conventions for reusable component assets --0016363104434ea06404ab5e05a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 So funny story. I have been on this list for about 3 months. Always told myself 'make sure your first post is a good one'. Looks like my luck is what I thought. Pretty bad. Sorry about my rear end trying to hijack your thread! Enterprise Solutions Consultant Aaron Peter Samuel 347.998.4023 (mobile) On Aug 25, 2011 4:10 PM, "Aaron Samuel" wrote: > Cnjm > > Enterprise Solutions Consultant > Aaron Peter Samuel > 347.998.4023 (mobile) > On Aug 24, 2011 11:48 AM, "Richard Conroy" wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Intransition wrote: >> >>> What conventions have evolved for placing reusable website assets in a >>> project? Do people just mix in all a components assets in with the >>> other assets, >>> >>> cp -r foo/assets/images/* mysite/assets/images/ >>> cp -r foo/assets/stylesheets/* mysite/assets/stylesheets/ >>> ... >>> >>> >> Is this for content across projects? For example, company logos, flash >> animations? >> >> I have heard of companies making very atomic versions of gems to take DRY >> concepts across projects. >> >> Perhaps it might work well for static assets too. >> >> >> -- >> http://richardconroy.blogspot.com | http://twitter.com/RichardConroy --0016363104434ea06404ab5e05a2--