and <pre> :) The <hx> class of tags is useful too (semantic markup!), as is the <table> for tabular data. > However, I don't think I'm representative of the Ruby community at > large. Nope, I prefer a lack of JS, frames, and nonsense like that, too. -- Phillip Gawlowski phgaw.posterous.com | twitter.com/phgaw | gplus.to/phgaw A method of solution is perfect if we can forsee from the start, and even prove, that following that method we shall attain our aim. -- Leibniz

From: Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@...>
Date: 2011-08-06T05:37:00+09:00
Subject: Re: Brainstorming ideas how to improve Ruby's documentation

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
>
> While I'm bikeshedding, I do wish RDoc didn't use icons/JS at all.  The
> The only useful tags in HTML to me are <a>, <title> and <pre> :)

The <hx> class of tags is useful too (semantic markup!), as is the
<table> for tabular data.

> However, I don't think I'm representative of the Ruby community at
> large.

Nope, I prefer a lack of JS, frames, and nonsense like that, too.

-- 
Phillip Gawlowski

phgaw.posterous.com | twitter.com/phgaw | gplus.to/phgaw

A method of solution is perfect if we can forsee from the start,
and even prove, that following that method we shall attain our aim.
              -- Leibniz