[#9381] Native Thread extension for 1.8 — "Abhisek Datta" <abhisek@...>
Hello,
[#9382] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2 — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #6468, was opened at 2006-11-03 17:25
On 11/3/06, noreply@rubyforge.org <noreply@rubyforge.org> wrote:
Jacob Fugal wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9385] merge YARV into Ruby — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
On Nov 3, 2006, at 9:11 PM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
On 11/4/06, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 16:01, Kirill Shutemov wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 10:15, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
On 11/6/06, Sean Russell <ser@germane-software.com> wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 13:37, Kirill Shutemov wrote:
On 11/6/06, Kirill Shutemov <k.shutemov@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/8/06, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/6/06, ville.mattila@stonesoft.com <ville.mattila@stonesoft.com> wrote:
On 2006-11-07 00:47:20 +0900, Kirill Shutemov wrote:
On 11/6/06, Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@suse.de> wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Joshua Haberman wrote:
[#9402] fast mutexes for 1.8? — MenTaLguY <mental@...>
Many people have been using Thread.critical for locking because Ruby
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 23:17 +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 23:21 +0900, khaines@enigo.com wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 09:38, MenTaLguY wrote:
[#9450] Bikeshed: No more Symbol < String? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>
Hi ruby-core!
Hi,
David wrote:
On Nov 7, 2006, at 2:28 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Too bad, I was rejoicing to remove the need of
[#9470] Ruby performanmce improvements — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...>
I know you guys are in the middle of YARV stuff, but I thought you might be
Hi,
[#9472] Re: fast mutexes for 1.8? — Brent Roman <brent@...>
At RubyConf 2005 I gave an off-the-wall little talk about the
[#9493] Future Plans for Ruby 1.8 Series — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
This week Japanese rubyists were talking about the future of ruby_1_8
[#9515] External entropy pool for random number generator — "Kirill Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>
In the attachment patch which allow to use external entropy pool for
Hi,
On 11/13/06, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 11/13/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
[#9520] Re: fast mutexes for 1.8? — Brent Roman <brent@...>
[#9540] Different return values for setter methods — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...>
>> class Setter; def set=(value) 1 end end
[#9547] Net::FTP should check the control connection on EPIPE — Simon Williams <simon.williams@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 11:23:01AM +0900, Shugo Maeda wrote:
[#9554] Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I've been thinking about how version numbers are restricting what we can do.
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Nov 16, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On 11/16/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Nov 19, 2006, at 6:35 AM, Robert Dober wrote:
On Nov 19, 2006, at 8:13 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
> What if we need to exceed 1.8.9?
On Nov 19, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#9572] io_write (io.c) bug (and its fix) under MS Windows for GUI apps (rubyw) — "Mounir Idrassi" <idrassi@...>
Hi all,
[#9581] type information — Deni George <denigeorge@...>
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#9604] #ancestors never includes the singleton class (inconsistent) — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #6820, was opened at 2006-11-22 08:49
Hi,
> It is supposed to. Singleton classes (or eigenclasses, if you want to
On 11/27/06, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
> 2) You could think of all objects already having a singleton class
Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6788 ] In a c++ program, when I call "fclose()", or "ofstream::close()" in a file that includes ruby.h, the program crashes
On 11/20/06, noreply@rubyforge.org <noreply@rubyforge.org> wrote:
> Bugs item #6788, was opened at 2006-11-20 16:35
> You can respond by visiting:
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=6788&group_id=426
>
> Category: Core
> Group: 1.8.2
> Status: Open
> Resolution: None
> Priority: 3
> Submitted By: ozi alt (ozizus)
> Assigned to: Nobody (None)
> Summary: In a c++ program, when I call "fclose()", or "ofstream::close()" in a file that includes ruby.h, the program crashes
>
> Initial Comment:
> I am embedding ruby strings to my c++ application and calling them with rb_eval_string, and I love it.
>
> But I noticed this problem:
>
> When I call the C call "fclose()", or "ofstream::close()" in a file that includes ruby.h:
>
> First the Compiler gives a varning:
>
> Warning 4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'close'
>
> But compilation finishes fine. Then on runtime, debugger catches an unhandled exception in the fstream file on this code:
> ...
> if (fclose(_Myfile) != 0)
> _Ans = 0;
> }
> ...
>
> If I put the ruby.h inclusion and fclose() call in different files, the system still gives the warnings, but the program works fine.
>
> I cannot seem to reproduce now, but when I was trying to find the problem I saw some warnings about "rb_w32_fclose" of ruby API.
>
> No, There is no problem with my code, as the problem reoccurs even with this simple program that I copy/pasted from web: remove the '#include "ruby.h"' and the program works. Else, it crashes.
>
>
> /* fopen example */
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> #include "ruby.h"
>
> int main ()
> {
> FILE * pFile;
> pFile = fopen ("myfile.txt","wt");
> if (pFile!=NULL)
> {
> fputs ("fopen example",pFile);
> fclose (pFile);
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> My system:
>
> IDE: MSVS2005 on WinXPPro
> RUBY: ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-mswin32]
>
> Good Luck
I've had a similar problem recently, when compiling a C++ extension
with vs2005 and 1.8.5 libs, this time I had a
Warning 4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'write'
and
Warning 4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'read'
in ostream and istream respectively ('write' is an argument to some STL method)
I got around this with #undef write and #undef read just before
#Include <ostream> or whatever the main included file was. I don't
call 'write' and 'read' in my code anyway, and none of the header
mentions them either. So far it seems to work, although I don't feel
really safe ;-)
My problem didn't happen in 1.8.4 as those macros were enclosed within
#ifdef __BORLANDC__ (although this is not the case with close and
fclose).