[#9644] Determinant Problem in Matrix.rb — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7001, was opened at 2006-12-01 03:50
This is 100% intended. You have to learn integer arithmetics when you
[#9654] Float numbers comparison — "Paulo Soeiro" <pcsoeiro@...>
Hi,
On 12/1/06, Paulo Soeiro <pcsoeiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#9661] Dir.exist? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>
hi!
[#9664] Bigdecimal isn't comparable — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7045, was opened at 2006-12-04 19:20
On 12/4/06, noreply@rubyforge.org <noreply@rubyforge.org> wrote:
[#9685] Segmentation fault - bignorm() — ico@... (Ico Doornekamp)
[#9713] Sets and String subclasses — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7253, was opened at 2006-12-13 12:26
> I would expect the second puts to return 5, not nil. In fact, I'd expect s.to_a[0] to return the same object as a.
[#9722] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7278, was opened at 2006-12-14 13:59
Hi,
I bet your script /usr/local/bin/p4 is a shell script which doesn't have a
On Dec 14, 2006, at 18:57, Michael Selig wrote:
[#9725] Fixes going into 1.8.5.9 — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>
Hello,
[#9749] System V IPC in standard library? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>
Back in August, I needed a semaphore to serialize access to an external
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
[#9753] CVS freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
* Shugo Maeda (shugo@ruby-lang.org) wrote:
[#9794] Fwd: [Vit-core] Ruby 1.8.5-p2 Stable Version download bug-fix confusion. — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
The following is a complaint we received about the Ruby home page today.
[#9797] Where to start — "Strong Cypher" <cypherstrong@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#9803] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — <noreply@...>
Patches item #7499, was opened at 2006-12-30 05:23
On 12/30/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Dec 30, 2006, at 19:16, Daniel Berger wrote:
On Dec 31, 2006, at 24:31, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#9816] merge YARV — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6987 ] Double-free problem in the interpreter
> Thank you for the report. Although this indicates double free
> problem, the information is not enough to locate the place to fix.
> Can you show us the program to reproduce the error?
Well, I can show you the *application* which does that. The problem is that
I cannot really narrow down the problem since if I remove code it seems to
disappear.
Anyway, you can get the relevant part of the code at
http://www.jhaampe.org/~doudou/roby-rubybug.tar.bz2
You'll need
* to build the extension in ext/ and to make a symbolic link of
ext/bgl.so in lib/roby
* the utilrb library. It is available as a gem. I released 0.2.2 (which
is needed) today, so if it is not available yet on the gem server, you can
get it at
http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/15216/utilrb-0.2.2.gem
You can trigger the problem by launching test/suite_distributed.rb with
testrb
testrb test/suite_distributed.rb
It is 100% reproducible on 3 machines I have access to:
- FC5 with vanilla ruby
- Debian/i386 and Debian/PPC, unstable, with the debian package
In general, when problem appears, you get the following messages:
*** glibc detected *** corrupted double-linked list: 0xa7df74f8 ***
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/monitor.rb:296: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i486-linux]
(and since I'm doing DRb stuff across forked instances, a
Errno::ECONNREFUSED exception)
--
Sylvain Joyeux