[#9644] Determinant Problem in Matrix.rb — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7001, was opened at 2006-12-01 03:50
This is 100% intended. You have to learn integer arithmetics when you
[#9654] Float numbers comparison — "Paulo Soeiro" <pcsoeiro@...>
Hi,
On 12/1/06, Paulo Soeiro <pcsoeiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#9661] Dir.exist? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>
hi!
[#9664] Bigdecimal isn't comparable — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7045, was opened at 2006-12-04 19:20
On 12/4/06, noreply@rubyforge.org <noreply@rubyforge.org> wrote:
[#9685] Segmentation fault - bignorm() — ico@... (Ico Doornekamp)
[#9713] Sets and String subclasses — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7253, was opened at 2006-12-13 12:26
> I would expect the second puts to return 5, not nil. In fact, I'd expect s.to_a[0] to return the same object as a.
[#9722] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7278, was opened at 2006-12-14 13:59
Hi,
I bet your script /usr/local/bin/p4 is a shell script which doesn't have a
On Dec 14, 2006, at 18:57, Michael Selig wrote:
[#9725] Fixes going into 1.8.5.9 — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>
Hello,
[#9749] System V IPC in standard library? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>
Back in August, I needed a semaphore to serialize access to an external
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
[#9753] CVS freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
* Shugo Maeda (shugo@ruby-lang.org) wrote:
[#9794] Fwd: [Vit-core] Ruby 1.8.5-p2 Stable Version download bug-fix confusion. — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
The following is a complaint we received about the Ruby home page today.
[#9797] Where to start — "Strong Cypher" <cypherstrong@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#9803] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — <noreply@...>
Patches item #7499, was opened at 2006-12-30 05:23
On 12/30/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Dec 30, 2006, at 19:16, Daniel Berger wrote:
On Dec 31, 2006, at 24:31, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#9816] merge YARV — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Re: Float numbers comparison
Hi,
Thank you all for your awnsers, i haven't read them all. But i don't see
this problem occurring in java language, when comparing 1.9 with 1.8+0.1.
And java, seems to be using the same standard:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/vmspec/2nd-edition/html/Concepts.doc.html#33377
Thank you very much.
Paulo Soeiro
-------------------
package javaapplication1;
import java.lang.* ;
public class Main {
public Main() {
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
// TODO code application logic here
for(int i=0; i<1000; i++){
float a=(float)1.9;
float b=(float)1.8+(float)0.1;
System.out.println(a==b);
System.out.println("a-b="+(a-b));
}
}
}
--
...
true
a-b=0.0
true
a-b=0.0
true
a-b=0.0
true
a-b=0.0
true
...
On 12/2/06, Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/1/06, Paulo Soeiro <pcsoeiro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a doubt about the floating point comparisons:
> >
> > a=1.9
> > b= 1.8 +0.1
> > puts a==b #false
> >
> > The result is false.
> >
> > If i change the values,
> >
> > a=1.6
> > b= 1.5 +0.1
> > puts a==b #true
> >
> > The result is true
> >
> > This doesn't seem to happen in C language or in Java language.
> > Is it a bug? I'm using ruby version 1.8.5.
> >
>
> 0.1 is a repeating series in binary, like 1/3 in decimal. (0.3333333333~)
> Adding small FP values to certain others can have unexpected results.
> Equality is not guaranteed in IEEE floating point.
>
> See here for more info:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_754
>
> This is not specific to Ruby, but basically amounts to the way your
> computer's CPU represents floating-point numbers.
>
>