[#9722] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7278, was opened at 2006-12-14 13:59

8 messages 2006/12/14

[#9749] System V IPC in standard library? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>

Back in August, I needed a semaphore to serialize access to an external

14 messages 2006/12/19

[#9753] CVS freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2006/12/20
[#9755] Re: [ruby-dev:30039] CVS freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2006/12/20

Hi,

[#9757] Re: [ruby-dev:30040] Re: CVS freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2006/12/20

Hi,

Re: Fixes going into 1.8.5.9

From: "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>
Date: 2006-12-15 03:26:13 UTC
List: ruby-core #9727
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:00:18 +0900, Urabe Shyouhei  
<shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

> "Preventable incidents should be untouched" is our primary policy for
> 1.8.5 series and I see 1.2.2.14 of ri_options.rb is one of those.
> Please let me know if it is not.

Do you have a link that explains this policy?  Japanese is fine.

As for the ri_options, all I can say is that previous ruby versions
worked and now with ruby 1.8.5 I constantly have to patch it in order
to get some of my tools to not crash.

>> Is there any plan to merge this fix into the 1.8.5 tag set?  I also
>> noticed that 1.8.5 has not been branched yet.  Are there plans to do
>> this?  If so it might be easier to merge bug fixes if it is branched.
>
> 1.8.5 has been branched under ruby_1_8_5:
>
> % cvs -qz3 -d :pserver:anonymous@cvs.ruby-lang.org:/src co -r ruby_1_8_5  
> -P ruby

Ah, I missed that. I assumed that the cvsweb would have shown all the
branches, but 1_8_5 was not in the link I posted.

Thanks,
Zev

In This Thread