[#9644] Determinant Problem in Matrix.rb — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7001, was opened at 2006-12-01 03:50
This is 100% intended. You have to learn integer arithmetics when you
[#9654] Float numbers comparison — "Paulo Soeiro" <pcsoeiro@...>
Hi,
On 12/1/06, Paulo Soeiro <pcsoeiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#9661] Dir.exist? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>
hi!
[#9664] Bigdecimal isn't comparable — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7045, was opened at 2006-12-04 19:20
On 12/4/06, noreply@rubyforge.org <noreply@rubyforge.org> wrote:
[#9685] Segmentation fault - bignorm() — ico@... (Ico Doornekamp)
[#9713] Sets and String subclasses — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7253, was opened at 2006-12-13 12:26
> I would expect the second puts to return 5, not nil. In fact, I'd expect s.to_a[0] to return the same object as a.
[#9722] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7278, was opened at 2006-12-14 13:59
Hi,
I bet your script /usr/local/bin/p4 is a shell script which doesn't have a
On Dec 14, 2006, at 18:57, Michael Selig wrote:
[#9725] Fixes going into 1.8.5.9 — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>
Hello,
[#9749] System V IPC in standard library? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>
Back in August, I needed a semaphore to serialize access to an external
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
[#9753] CVS freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
* Shugo Maeda (shugo@ruby-lang.org) wrote:
[#9794] Fwd: [Vit-core] Ruby 1.8.5-p2 Stable Version download bug-fix confusion. — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
The following is a complaint we received about the Ruby home page today.
[#9797] Where to start — "Strong Cypher" <cypherstrong@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#9803] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — <noreply@...>
Patches item #7499, was opened at 2006-12-30 05:23
On 12/30/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Dec 30, 2006, at 19:16, Daniel Berger wrote:
On Dec 31, 2006, at 24:31, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#9816] merge YARV — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Re: Float numbers comparison
> a=1.9
> b= 1.8 +0.1
> puts a==b #false
The Test::Unit library provides a special method to deal with that
technical issue, called
assert_in_delta:
Passes if +expected_float+ and +actual_float+ are equal
within +delta+ tolerance.
Example:
assert_in_delta 0.05, (50000.0 / 10**6), 0.00001
Inside, it's using this formula:
(expected_float.to_f - actual_float.to_f).abs <= delta.to_f
You can easily make a new Float#about_equal method out of this, or
you use Float#===,
or even overwrite Float#==.
Or, if you prefer calculating with fractions, you can use the
Rational library.
However, I wonder what the Float::EPSILON constant is about. Can it
be used as a sensible
default tolerance delta?
1.0 / (1.0 / 0.0) == 0.0 # ^^
[murphy]