ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#9644] Determinant Problem in Matrix.rb — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7001, was opened at 2006-12-01 03:50

8 messages 2006/12/01

[#9651] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7001 ] Determinant Problem in Matrix.rb — Nex3 <nex342@...> 2006/12/01

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

[#9645] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7001 ] Determinant Problem in Matrix.rb — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/12/01

This is 100% intended. You have to learn integer arithmetics when you

[#9646] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7001 ] Determinant Problem in Matrix.rb — Nex3 <nex342@...> 2006/12/01

URABE Shyouhei wrote:

[#9649] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7001 ] Determinant Problem in Matrix.rb — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/12/01

Nex3 wrote:

[#9650] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7001 ] Determinant Problem in Matrix.rb — Nex3 <nex342@...> 2006/12/01

Steven Jenkins wrote:

[#9652] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7001 ] Determinant Problem in Matrix.rb — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/12/01

Nex3 wrote:

[#9647] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7001 ] Determinant Problem in Matrix.rb — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/12/01

Nex3 wrote:

[#9654] Float numbers comparison — "Paulo Soeiro" <pcsoeiro@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/12/02

[#9655] Re: Float numbers comparison — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2006/12/02

On 12/1/06, Paulo Soeiro <pcsoeiro@gmail.com> wrote:

[#9656] Re: Float numbers comparison — zdennis <zdennis@...> 2006/12/02

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#9657] Re: Float numbers comparison — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2006/12/02

> a=1.9

[#9735] Re: Float numbers comparison — "Paulo Soeiro" <pcsoeiro@...> 2006/12/16

Hi,

[#9736] Re: Float numbers comparison — mathew <meta@...> 2006/12/17

On 12/16/06, Paulo Soeiro <pcsoeiro@gmail.com> wrote:

[#9737] Re: Float numbers comparison — "Paulo Soeiro" <pcsoeiro@...> 2006/12/17

Thank you very much.

[#9673] Re: Float numbers comparison — gwtmp01@... 2006/12/07

[#9658] What's up with dates? — "Micah Wylde" <wyldeone@...>

I have a question about why dates are like they are in ruby. In ruby,

2 messages 2006/12/02

[#9659] Re: What's up with dates? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/02

On Dec 1, 2006, at 20:32 , Micah Wylde wrote:

[#9661] Dir.exist? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>

hi!

7 messages 2006/12/04

[#9663] Re: Dir.exist? — Nate Wiger <nwiger@...> 2006/12/04

Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:

[#9667] Re: Dir.exist? — nobu@... 2006/12/05

Hi,

[#9668] Re: Dir.exist? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2006/12/05

> Also Socket.exist?, Pipe.exist?, Symlink.exist? and so on?

[#9669] Re: Dir.exist? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2006/12/05

> Also Socket.exist?, Pipe.exist?, Symlink.exist? and so on?

[#9674] Re: Dir.exist? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/12/07

Hi,

[#9699] Re: Dir.exist? — murphy <murphy@...> 2006/12/11

> # Dir.exist? was added anyway.

[#9662] Cannot parse one-way WSDL - binding style="document", no wsdl:output tag — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7036, was opened at 2006-12-04 23:25

1 message 2006/12/04

[#9664] Bigdecimal isn't comparable — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7045, was opened at 2006-12-04 19:20

6 messages 2006/12/04

[#9665] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7045 ] Bigdecimal isn't comparable — "Arnaud Bergeron" <abergeron@...> 2006/12/04

On 12/4/06, noreply@rubyforge.org <noreply@rubyforge.org> wrote:

[#9709] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7045 ] Bigdecimal isn't comparable — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/12/13

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:03:08PM +0100, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:

[#9710] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7045 ] Bigdecimal isn't comparable — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/12/13

Hi,

[#9711] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7045 ] Bigdecimal isn't comparable — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/12/13

[#9712] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7045 ] Bigdecimal isn't comparable — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/12/13

Hi,

[#9666] Re: Ruby performance improvements — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...>

> I'd like to test the patch (I'm interested in this kind of performance

3 messages 2006/12/04

[#9734] Re: Ruby performance improvements — khaines@... 2006/12/16

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Michael Selig wrote:

[#9739] Re: Ruby performance improvements — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2006/12/17

Thank you for testing my patches.

[#9670] CSV Issue — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Greg Brown located an issue with the CSV library last night. I won't

2 messages 2006/12/05

[#9672] Re: CSV Issue — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2006/12/06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#9675] Exceptions raised during 'at_exit' hooks produce inaccurate messages — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7150, was opened at 2006-12-07 11:42

3 messages 2006/12/07

[#9678] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7150 ] Exceptions raised during 'at_exit' hooks produce inaccurate messages — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/12/08

Hi,

[#9679] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7150 ] Exceptions raised during 'at_exit' hooks produce inaccurate messages — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/12/08

Hi,

[#9676] WeakRefs not "weak" on FreeBSD/Mac OS X — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7153, was opened at 2006-12-07 13:51

2 messages 2006/12/07

[#9677] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7153 ] WeakRefs not "weak" on FreeBSD/Mac OS X — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/07

On Dec 7, 2006, at 10:52 , <noreply@rubyforge.org>

[#9680] ri cannot display documents about the attributes of classes — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>

Hello,

3 messages 2006/12/08

[#9681] Re: ri cannot display documents about the attributes of classes — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/08

On Dec 7, 2006, at 23:55 , U.Nakamura wrote:

[#9682] Re: ri cannot display documents about the attributes of classes — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/12/08

こんにちは、なかむら(う)です。

[#9683] rdoc aborting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

2 messages 2006/12/08

[#9684] Re: rdoc aborting? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/12/08

On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#9685] Segmentation fault - bignorm() — ico@... (Ico Doornekamp)

9 messages 2006/12/08

[#9686] Re: Segmentation fault - bignorm() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/12/08

Hi,

[#9689] Re: Segmentation fault - bignorm() — Tadashi Saito <shiba@...2.accsnet.ne.jp> 2006/12/09

Hi all,

[#9690] Re: Segmentation fault - bignorm() — ico@... (Ico Doornekamp) 2006/12/09

[#9691] Re: Segmentation fault - bignorm() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/12/09

Hi,

[#9692] Re: Segmentation fault - bignorm() — ico@... (Ico Doornekamp) 2006/12/09

[#9694] Re: Segmentation fault - bignorm() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/12/09

Hi,

[#9687] Re: Segmentation fault - bignorm() — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/12/08

Ico Doornekamp wrote:

[#9688] Re: Segmentation fault - bignorm() — ico@... (Ico Doornekamp) 2006/12/08

[#9693] Error msg: /tmp/mysql.sock not found — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7191, was opened at 2006-12-09 21:38

1 message 2006/12/09

[#9695] String#[]= decimal bug — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7202, was opened at 2006-12-09 23:21

2 messages 2006/12/10

[#9760] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7202 ] String#[]= decimal bug — Lei Ming <ming.lei@...> 2006/12/20

Hi,

[#9696] using OptionParser.on_tail leads to missed AmbiguousOption — Jim Meyering <list+ruby@...>

From a quick look at ruby1.9's optparse.rb, it seems options registered

2 messages 2006/12/10

[#9698] Re: using OptionParser.on_tail leads to missed AmbiguousOption — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/12/11

Hi,

[#9697] ERb throws SystemStackError on Solaris 10 — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7205, was opened at 2006-12-10 19:35

1 message 2006/12/10

[#9700] OpenSSL library not updated with new PKCS #12 features — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7218, was opened at 2006-12-11 17:55

1 message 2006/12/11

[#9701] File.syscopy: close from if open on to fails — Matthias Lederhofer <matled@...>

File.syscopy did not close from if open on to failed. The garbage

2 messages 2006/12/11

[#9705] Re: [PATCH] File.syscopy: close from if open on to fails — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/12/12

Hi,

[#9702] another unpatched CGI vulnerability from 2004? — murphy <murphy@...>

I came upon this:

3 messages 2006/12/11

[#9703] Re: another unpatched CGI vulnerability from 2004? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/12/11

Hi,

[#9704] Re: another unpatched CGI vulnerability from 2004? — murphy <murphy@...> 2006/12/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto schrieb:

[#9706] net/ftp login appears to be broken — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7224, was opened at 2006-12-12 13:34

2 messages 2006/12/12

[#9707] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7224 ] net/ftp login appears to be broken — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/12/12

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#9708] Net::IMAP seems unable to parse NOMODSEQ line from Cyrus IMAP server — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7233, was opened at 2006-12-12 11:36

1 message 2006/12/12

[#9713] Sets and String subclasses — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7253, was opened at 2006-12-13 12:26

4 messages 2006/12/13

[#9714] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7253 ] Sets and String subclasses — murphy <murphy@...> 2006/12/13

> I would expect the second puts to return 5, not nil. In fact, I'd expect s.to_a[0] to return the same object as a.

[#9715] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7253 ] Sets and String subclasses — "Jan Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2006/12/13

On 12/13/06, murphy <murphy@rubychan.de> wrote:

[#9716] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7253 ] Sets and String subclasses — "Jan Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2006/12/13

On 12/13/06, Jan Svitok <jan.svitok@gmail.com> wrote:

[#9717] Bug in string literal '\c' — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7262, was opened at 2006-12-14 00:19

1 message 2006/12/14

[#9718] bug with string literal '\c' — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7263, was opened at 2006-12-14 00:20

2 messages 2006/12/14

[#9719] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7263 ] bug with string literal '\c' — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/12/14

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#9720] Inconsistant parsing within a block — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7274, was opened at 2006-12-14 13:08

2 messages 2006/12/14

[#9721] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7274 ] Inconsistant parsing within a block — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/14

On Dec 14, 2006, at 13:08, <noreply@rubyforge.org>

[#9722] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7278, was opened at 2006-12-14 13:59

8 messages 2006/12/14

[#9733] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7278 ] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/12/16

Hi,

[#9767] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7278 ] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/20

On Dec 15, 2006, at 18:09, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#9768] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7278 ] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/12/21

Hi,

[#9723] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7278 ] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2006/12/14

I bet your script /usr/local/bin/p4 is a shell script which doesn't have a

[#9724] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7278 ] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/15

On Dec 14, 2006, at 18:57, Michael Selig wrote:

[#9728] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7278 ] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — "Jim Helm" <perlguy@...> 2006/12/15

Sounds like the difference betwen exec and /bin/sh running p4 could still be

[#9732] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7278 ] Kernel#system broken inside Dir.chdir(&block) if system command doesn't have shell characters — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/12/15

[#9725] Fixes going into 1.8.5.9 — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2006/12/15

[#9726] Re: Fixes going into 1.8.5.9 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/12/15

Hi,

[#9727] Re: Fixes going into 1.8.5.9 — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2006/12/15

On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:00:18 +0900, Urabe Shyouhei

[#9729] Re: Fixes going into 1.8.5.9 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/12/15

Hi,

[#9730] Re: Fixes going into 1.8.5.9 — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2006/12/15

Hello,

[#9731] Re: Fixes going into 1.8.5.9 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/15

On Dec 15, 2006, at 02:43, Zev Blut wrote:

[#9738] cgi.rb bug with Ruby 1.9 — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7322, was opened at 2006-12-17 20:49

3 messages 2006/12/17

[#9740] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7322 ] cgi.rb bug with Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/12/17

Hi,

[#9750] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7322 ] cgi.rb bug with Ruby 1.9 — Francois <fg@...> 2006/12/19

Hello,

[#9741] Ruby 1.8.5-p11 preview — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2006/12/18

[#9742] Re: Ruby 1.8.5-p11 preview — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/12/18

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#9743] Request MD5 for ruby185-21.exe (Win32 distribution) — Amanda Waltman <Amanda.Waltman@...>

Hello

2 messages 2006/12/18

[#9744] Re: Request MD5 for ruby185-21.exe (Win32 distribution) — "Jan Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2006/12/18

On 12/18/06, Amanda Waltman <Amanda.Waltman@noaa.gov> wrote:

[#9749] System V IPC in standard library? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>

Back in August, I needed a semaphore to serialize access to an external

14 messages 2006/12/19

[#9751] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/12/20

Hi,

[#9752] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/12/20

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#9762] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/12/20

Hi,

[#9769] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/12/21

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#9773] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/12/22

Hi,

[#9785] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/12/24

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#9834] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — "Stephen Duncan" <stephen.duncan@...> 2007/01/02

I currently do work with System V message queues using Java + JTux,

[#9828] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/01/02

Quoting steven.jenkins@ieee.org, on Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:00:09AM +0900:

[#9836] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — Rob Muhlestein <rob@...> 2007/01/02

On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 15:02 +0900, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#9830] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2007/01/02

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

[#9831] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — gus <gus@...> 2007/01/02

On 1/2/07 12:31 PM, "Steven Jenkins" <steven.jenkins@ieee.org> wrote:

[#9835] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2007/01/02

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

[#9837] Re: System V IPC in standard library? — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2007/01/02

"M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@cesmail.net> writes:

[#9753] CVS freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2006/12/20

[#9755] Re: [ruby-dev:30039] CVS freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2006/12/20

Hi,

[#9757] Re: [ruby-dev:30040] Re: CVS freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2006/12/20

Hi,

[#9764] Re: [ruby-dev:30040] Re: CVS freeze — Paul Duncan <pabs@...> 2006/12/20

* SASADA Koichi (ko1@atdot.net) wrote:

[#9766] Re: [ruby-dev:30040] Re: CVS freeze — "Nicolas Despr鑚" <nicolas.despres@...> 2006/12/20

On 12/20/06, Paul Duncan <pabs@pablotron.org> wrote:

[#9770] SVN ready — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2006/12/21

Hi,

[#9772] Re: SVN ready — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2006/12/22

Hi,

[#9791] Re: SVN ready — Paul Duncan <pabs@...> 2006/12/27

* Shugo Maeda (shugo@ruby-lang.org) wrote:

[#9798] Re: SVN ready — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2006/12/29

Hi,

[#9775] Troubles moving 1.8.5 branch into svn — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/12/23

[#9776] Re: Troubles moving 1.8.5 branch into svn — ville.mattila@... 2006/12/23

The big question is, why do we enable keyword substition. This just causes

[#9777] Re: Troubles moving 1.8.5 branch into svn — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/23

On Dec 22, 2006, at 20:58, ville.mattila@stonesoft.com wrote:

[#9778] Re: Troubles moving 1.8.5 branch into svn — ville.mattila@... 2006/12/23

Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote on 23.12.2006 10:48:27:

[#9774] Re: SVN ready — "Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido" <gerardo.santana@...> 2006/12/22

2006/12/22, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org>:

[#9851] Re: [ruby-dev:30043] SVN ready — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2007/01/04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#9927] Re: [ruby-dev:30069] Re: SVN ready — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2007/01/12

Hi,

[#9779] Re: SVN ready — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2006/12/23

On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 19:39 +0900, Shugo Maeda wrote:

[#9780] Re: SVN ready — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/24

On Dec 23, 2006, at 14:46, MenTaLguY wrote:

[#9756] Re: [ruby-dev:30039] CVS freeze — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/12/20

SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#9765] Re: [ruby-dev:30039] CVS freeze — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/12/20

On Wednesday 20 December 2006 1:10 am, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#9754] String#slice! documentation bug — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7379, was opened at 2006-12-19 23:09

1 message 2006/12/20

[#9758] ICLASS Node? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I have been looking at the nodes generated for a simple program. It

4 messages 2006/12/20

[#9759] Re: ICLASS Node? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/20

On Dec 20, 2006, at 24:01, Charles Thornton wrote:

[#9761] Re: ICLASS Node? — Julien Gaugaz <gaugaz@...3s.de> 2006/12/20

Charles Thornton wrote:

[#9763] Re: ICLASS Node? — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2006/12/20

On Dec 20, 2006, at 5:12 AM, Julien Gaugaz wrote:

[#9771] Rb_class_tbl - Odd Behavior — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I was looking thru the code for defining a class.

1 message 2006/12/22

[#9781] cgi.rb still don't like 1.9 — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7430, was opened at 2006-12-24 05:56

2 messages 2006/12/24

[#9793] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7430 ] cgi.rb still don't like 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/12/28

Hi,

[#9782] Delegation and 1.9 — Francois <fg@...>

Hello,

1 message 2006/12/24

[#9783] rdoc fails to parse complex method def — murphy <murphy@...>

rdoc can't handle the following code and crashes:

2 messages 2006/12/24

[#9789] Re: rdoc fails to parse complex method def — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/25

On Dec 24, 2006, at 04:47, murphy wrote:

[#9784] Conflict with STL <iostream> and ruby 1.8.5. headers — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7431, was opened at 2006-12-24 14:43

1 message 2006/12/24

[#9786] Manifest file not generated for extensions with VC++ 8 — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2006/12/24

[#9787] Re: Manifest file not generated for extensions with VC++ 8 — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/12/25

Hi,

[#9788] Re: Manifest file not generated for extensions with VC++ 8 — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/12/25

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#9790] Installing a signal handler — "Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido" <gerardo.santana@...>

Is it safe to install a signal handler for SIGINT from a C extension

1 message 2006/12/26

[#9792] Ruby on VxWorks. — "Lakhbir Gandhi" <lgandhi@...>

Hello,

1 message 2006/12/28

[#9794] Fwd: [Vit-core] Ruby 1.8.5-p2 Stable Version download bug-fix confusion. — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

The following is a complaint we received about the Ruby home page today.

3 messages 2006/12/29

[#9795] Re: Fwd: [Vit-core] Ruby 1.8.5-p2 Stable Version download bug-fix confusion. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/12/29

On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 09:30:54AM +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#9796] Re: [Vit-core] Ruby 1.8.5-p2 Stable Version download bug-fix confusion. — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/12/29

On Dec 28, 2006, at 6:47 PM, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:

[#9797] Where to start — "Strong Cypher" <cypherstrong@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

6 messages 2006/12/29

[#9801] Re: Where to start — Vimal <j.vimal@...> 2006/12/30

Hi

[#9802] Re: Where to start — "Strong Cypher" <cypherstrong@...> 2006/12/30

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#9811] Re: Where to start — dreamhead <dreamhead.cn@...> 2006/12/31

Because VALUE is NOT just a POINTER, such as Fixnum.

[#9799] Re: Where to start — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/12/29

On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 10:20:42PM +0900, Strong Cypher wrote:

[#9800] Re: Where to start — "Strong Cypher" <cypherstrong@...> 2006/12/29

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#9803] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — <noreply@...>

Patches item #7499, was opened at 2006-12-30 05:23

9 messages 2006/12/30

[#9809] Re: [ ruby-Patches-7499 ] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/30

[#9810] Re: [ ruby-Patches-7499 ] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...> 2006/12/31

On 12/30/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#9817] Re: [ ruby-Patches-7499 ] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/31

On Dec 30, 2006, at 19:16, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#9818] Re: [ ruby-Patches-7499 ] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/31

On Dec 31, 2006, at 24:31, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#9819] Re: [ ruby-Patches-7499 ] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/12/31

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#9821] Re: [ ruby-Patches-7499 ] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/31

On Dec 31, 2006, at 06:25, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#9823] Re: [ ruby-Patches-7499 ] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <zn@...> 2007/01/01

Hello,

[#9862] Re: [ ruby-Patches-7499 ] RDoc patch that fixes rb_const_define output — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/01/07

On Dec 31, 2006, at 22:37, Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA wrote:

[#9804] ^ | & Float bug — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7500, was opened at 2006-12-30 11:08

2 messages 2006/12/30

[#9807] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7500 ] ^ | & Float bug — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/12/30

Hi,

[#9805] Parse bug with if/unless/while/until modifiers — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #7502, was opened at 2006-12-30 11:40

2 messages 2006/12/30

[#9806] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7502 ] Parse bug with if/unless/while/until modifiers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/12/30

Hi,

[#9812] Suggestion: Post indentation style guideline to "Rules for Core Developers" — Rob Muhlestein <rob@...>

What *is* the preferred indentation style for ruby core C code?

5 messages 2006/12/31

[#9827] Re: Suggestion: Post indentation style guideline to "Rules for Core Developers" — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/01/02

On Jan 1, 2007, at 06:58, Rob Muhlestein wrote:

[#9844] Re: Suggestion: Post indentation style guideline to "Rules for Core Developers" — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2007/01/03

On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 11:58:18PM +0900, Rob Muhlestein wrote:

[#9815] Re: Suggestion: Post indentation style guideline to "Rules for Core Developers" — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/31

On Dec 30, 2006, at 20:02, Rob Muhlestein wrote:

[#9918] Re: Suggestion: Post indentation style guideline to "Rules for Core Developers" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/01/11

Hi,

[#9816] merge YARV — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2006/12/31

[#9824] Re: merge YARV — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/01/01

wonderful, YARV is Ruby!

[#9841] Re: merge YARV — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/01/03

Hi,

[#9825] YARV Benchmarks as HTML — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/01/01

I've written a little script to turn the benchmark output into a HTML table:

[#9840] Re: YARV Benchmarks as HTML — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/01/03

Hi,

[#9822] Re: merge YARV — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/12/31

On Dec 30, 2006, at 23:49, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#9842] Re: merge YARV — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/01/03

Hi,

[#9848] Re: merge YARV — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...> 2007/01/03

Hi,

[#9859] Re: merge YARV — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/01/05

[#9845] Re: merge YARV — "Julian Christopher Schnidder" <Julian.C.Schnidder@...> 2007/01/03

Hi,

[#9847] Re: merge YARV — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/01/03

On Jan 3, 2007, at 09:29, Julian Christopher Schnidder wrote:

[#9852] Re: merge YARV — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2007/01/04

SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> writes:

[#9820] Make PrettyPrint class methods inheritable. — <noreply@...>

Patches item #7510, was opened at 2006-12-31 18:29

1 message 2006/12/31

Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6820 ] #ancestors never includes the singleton class (inconsistent)

From: "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...>

Date: 2006-12-19 17:09:19 UTC

List: ruby-core #9747

On 12/18/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6820 ] #ancestors never includes the singleton class (inconsistent)"
>     on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:55:33 +0900, dblack@wobblini.net writes:
>
> |I tend to agree.  Anonymous classes are visible in ancestors, and
> |singleton classes are anonymous classes.  They are special in the
> |sense that they can't be instantiated, but I don't see why they should
> |be treated as special when reflecting on ancestry.
>
> I just remembered I made decision that singleton classes (or
> eigenclasses) were "real" anonymous classes rather than theoretical
> place holder.  That means having singleton classes in ancestors list
> makes sense.  I will change the behavior in the future.
>
> This is a step toward eigenclass method.
>

Is this an implicit vote for the 'eigenclass' name, or just a useful
placeholder?
I ask because Rubinius is currently calling this 'metaclass', and it
would be nice to keep the terminology in sync.
By 'in sync', I mean that we would change to match the official name. Heh.

Regards,
--Wilson.

Thread

In This Thread