[#9382] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2 — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6468, was opened at 2006-11-03 17:25

9 messages 2006/11/03

[#9385] merge YARV into Ruby — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

42 messages 2006/11/04
[#9405] Re: merge YARV into Ruby — "Kirill Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2006/11/06

On 11/4/06, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#9406] Re: merge YARV into Ruby — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2006/11/06

On Monday 06 November 2006 16:01, Kirill Shutemov wrote:

[#9417] Re: merge YARV into Ruby — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/11/06

On Monday 06 November 2006 10:15, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:

[#9428] Re: merge YARV into Ruby — "Kirill Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2006/11/06

On 11/6/06, Sean Russell <ser@germane-software.com> wrote:

[#9402] fast mutexes for 1.8? — MenTaLguY <mental@...>

Many people have been using Thread.critical for locking because Ruby

24 messages 2006/11/06

[#9450] Bikeshed: No more Symbol < String? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>

Hi ruby-core!

21 messages 2006/11/07
[#9452] Re: Bikeshed: No more Symbol < String? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/11/07

Hi,

[#9493] Future Plans for Ruby 1.8 Series — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

This week Japanese rubyists were talking about the future of ruby_1_8

13 messages 2006/11/09

[#9515] External entropy pool for random number generator — "Kirill Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>

In the attachment patch which allow to use external entropy pool for

13 messages 2006/11/11
[#9522] Re: External entropy pool for random number generator — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/11/13

Hi,

[#9554] Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

I've been thinking about how version numbers are restricting what we can do.

30 messages 2006/11/16
[#9561] Re: Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/11/16

[#9563] Re: Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/11/16

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#9564] Re: Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/11/16

On Nov 16, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Hugh Sasse wrote:

[#9571] Re: Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2006/11/19

On 11/16/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#9604] #ancestors never includes the singleton class (inconsistent) — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6820, was opened at 2006-11-22 08:49

12 messages 2006/11/22
[#9618] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6820 ] #ancestors never includes the singleton class (inconsistent) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/11/25

Hi,

[#9629] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6820 ] #ancestors never includes the singleton class (inconsistent) — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2006/11/27

> It is supposed to. Singleton classes (or eigenclasses, if you want to

io_write (io.c) bug (and its fix) under MS Windows for GUI apps (rubyw)

From: "Mounir Idrassi" <idrassi@...>
Date: 2006-11-19 14:39:06 UTC
List: ruby-core #9572
Hi all,
I recently encountered a problem under MS Windows where a GUI
application that runs correctly with ruby.exe refused to start with
rubuw.exe (1.8.5 version). After some digging I found that the problem
came from the function io_write in io.c : rb_sys_fail was called after
receiving -1 from io_fwrite. Actually, the ruby interpreter wanted to
print some warning to "rb_stderr" and because its a GUI application
with no console attached to it the C runtime returned -1. If I use
ruby.exe instead, the warnings are printed correctly.
To correct this behavior, it's sufficient to test if we have a console
attached to the current process and in case no one is found, we don't
call rb_sys_fail if the target stream is either rb_stderr ou
rb_stdout.
I made the following modifications to implement this :

    - Add a function named "ProcessHasConsole" in case we are
compiling for MS Windows that returns TRUE if a console is attached to
the current process and FALSE otherwise. You can find its body at the
end of this email.

    - In "io_write" body, replace the statement "if (n == -1)
rb_sys_fail(fptr->path);" with the following :
               if (n == -1)
               {
                  #ifdef _WIN32
                  if( (io != rb_stderr && io != rb_stdout) ||
ProcessHasConsole())
                  #endif
                  rb_sys_fail(fptr->path);
               }

I hope this can help Windows users of ruby that were affected by the
same problem as me.
Is there any specific protocol for submitting patches?

Cheers,

Mounir IDRASSI
IDRIX
web: http://www.idrix.fr

PS: body of the function  "ProcessHasConsole" :

#ifdef _WIN32
static BOOL ProcessHasConsole()
{
       TCHAR szTitle[128];
       if(GetConsoleTitle(szTitle,128) || GetLastError() == ERROR_SUCCESS)
                return TRUE;
       else
                return FALSE;
}
#endif

In This Thread

Prev Next