From: Vimal <j.vimal@...>
Date: 2006-11-20T22:51:02+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond.

------=_Part_41192_19816755.1164030649729
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

What would be wrong with
1.8.91 ? :)
1.8.9.1 ?

So that next time, if this one could expect smaller versions > 10,
1.8.0000001 :)
Oh, just ideas. Thats all!

Vimal

------=_Part_41192_19816755.1164030649729
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

What would be wrong with <br>1.8.91 ? :)<br><a href="http://1.8.9.1">1.8.9.1</a> ?<br><br>So that next time, if this one could expect smaller versions &gt; 10, 1.8.0000001 :)<br>Oh, just ideas. Thats all!<br><br>Vimal<br>

------=_Part_41192_19816755.1164030649729--