From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2006-11-20T18:33:50+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond.

On Nov 19, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:

>> What if we need to exceed 1.8.9?
> I guess the XP people would say: Let's see if we really run into that
> problem :) (and write more tests in the meanwhile.)
>
> But the question is surely interesting. I vote for 1.8.10.
> [murphy]

Not backwards compatible.

$ ruby -e 'p %w[1.8.1 1.8.2 1.8.9 1.8.10].sort'
["1.8.1", "1.8.10", "1.8.2", "1.8.9"]

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com