[#9381] Native Thread extension for 1.8 — "Abhisek Datta" <abhisek@...>
Hello,
[#9382] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2 — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #6468, was opened at 2006-11-03 17:25
On 11/3/06, noreply@rubyforge.org <noreply@rubyforge.org> wrote:
Jacob Fugal wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9385] merge YARV into Ruby — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
On Nov 3, 2006, at 9:11 PM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
On 11/4/06, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 16:01, Kirill Shutemov wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 10:15, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
On 11/6/06, Sean Russell <ser@germane-software.com> wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 13:37, Kirill Shutemov wrote:
On 11/6/06, Kirill Shutemov <k.shutemov@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/8/06, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/6/06, ville.mattila@stonesoft.com <ville.mattila@stonesoft.com> wrote:
On 2006-11-07 00:47:20 +0900, Kirill Shutemov wrote:
On 11/6/06, Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@suse.de> wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Joshua Haberman wrote:
[#9402] fast mutexes for 1.8? — MenTaLguY <mental@...>
Many people have been using Thread.critical for locking because Ruby
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 23:17 +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 23:21 +0900, khaines@enigo.com wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 09:38, MenTaLguY wrote:
[#9450] Bikeshed: No more Symbol < String? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>
Hi ruby-core!
Hi,
David wrote:
On Nov 7, 2006, at 2:28 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Too bad, I was rejoicing to remove the need of
[#9470] Ruby performanmce improvements — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...>
I know you guys are in the middle of YARV stuff, but I thought you might be
Hi,
[#9472] Re: fast mutexes for 1.8? — Brent Roman <brent@...>
At RubyConf 2005 I gave an off-the-wall little talk about the
[#9493] Future Plans for Ruby 1.8 Series — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
This week Japanese rubyists were talking about the future of ruby_1_8
[#9515] External entropy pool for random number generator — "Kirill Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>
In the attachment patch which allow to use external entropy pool for
Hi,
On 11/13/06, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 11/13/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
[#9520] Re: fast mutexes for 1.8? — Brent Roman <brent@...>
[#9540] Different return values for setter methods — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...>
>> class Setter; def set=(value) 1 end end
[#9547] Net::FTP should check the control connection on EPIPE — Simon Williams <simon.williams@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 11:23:01AM +0900, Shugo Maeda wrote:
[#9554] Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I've been thinking about how version numbers are restricting what we can do.
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Nov 16, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On 11/16/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Nov 19, 2006, at 6:35 AM, Robert Dober wrote:
On Nov 19, 2006, at 8:13 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
> What if we need to exceed 1.8.9?
On Nov 19, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#9572] io_write (io.c) bug (and its fix) under MS Windows for GUI apps (rubyw) — "Mounir Idrassi" <idrassi@...>
Hi all,
[#9581] type information — Deni George <denigeorge@...>
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#9604] #ancestors never includes the singleton class (inconsistent) — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #6820, was opened at 2006-11-22 08:49
Hi,
> It is supposed to. Singleton classes (or eigenclasses, if you want to
On 11/27/06, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
> 2) You could think of all objects already having a singleton class
[ ruby-Bugs-6513 ] RDoc: f95_parser needs patch to rdoc/option.rb
Bugs item #6513, was opened at 2006-11-06 00:30
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=6513&group_id=426
Category: Standard Library
Group: 1.8.5
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Bil Kleb (kleb)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: RDoc: f95_parser needs patch to rdoc/option.rb
Initial Comment:
1.8.5 RDoc fails to parse Fortran 95 files due to option.rb
and code_objects.rb not having the magic ignore_case
method/argument from Dennou club's monster patch?
For example,
$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [powerpc-darwin8.7.0]
$ cat > use_mod.f90
module test_f95parser
use other_module
contains
subroutine foobar
end subroutine
end module
$ rdoc use_mod.f90
use_mod.f90: m/usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:403:in `parse_program_or_module': undefined method `ignore_case' for #<Options:0x1118fcc> (NoMethodError)
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:306:in `scan'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:233:in `collect!'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:233:in `scan'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:210:in `parse_files'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:203:in `each'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:203:in `parse_files'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:246:in `document'
from /usr/local/bin/rdoc:63
where parse_f95.rb looks like
403 if !container.include_includes?(used_mod_name, @options.ignore_case)
404 progress "."
405 container.add_include Include.new(used_mod_name, "")
406 end
Or, a simpler case,
$ cat > test.f90
program f90
print *, 'hello'
end
$ rdoc test.f90
test.f90: p/usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:473:in `parse_program_or_module': undefined method `each_includes' for #<RDoc::TopLevel:0x111889c> (NoMethodError)
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:333:in `scan'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:233:in `collect!'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:233:in `scan'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:210:in `parse_files'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:203:in `each'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:203:in `parse_files'
from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:246:in `document'
from /usr/local/bin/rdoc:63
where parse_f95.rb looks like
473 container.each_includes{ |inc|
474 TopLevel.all_files.each do |name, toplevel|
475 indicated_mod = toplevel.find_symbol(inc.name,
476 nil, @options.ignore_case)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=6513&group_id=426