[#9382] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2 — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6468, was opened at 2006-11-03 17:25

9 messages 2006/11/03

[#9385] merge YARV into Ruby — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

42 messages 2006/11/04
[#9405] Re: merge YARV into Ruby — "Kirill Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2006/11/06

On 11/4/06, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#9406] Re: merge YARV into Ruby — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2006/11/06

On Monday 06 November 2006 16:01, Kirill Shutemov wrote:

[#9417] Re: merge YARV into Ruby — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/11/06

On Monday 06 November 2006 10:15, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:

[#9428] Re: merge YARV into Ruby — "Kirill Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2006/11/06

On 11/6/06, Sean Russell <ser@germane-software.com> wrote:

[#9402] fast mutexes for 1.8? — MenTaLguY <mental@...>

Many people have been using Thread.critical for locking because Ruby

24 messages 2006/11/06

[#9450] Bikeshed: No more Symbol < String? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>

Hi ruby-core!

21 messages 2006/11/07
[#9452] Re: Bikeshed: No more Symbol < String? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/11/07

Hi,

[#9493] Future Plans for Ruby 1.8 Series — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

This week Japanese rubyists were talking about the future of ruby_1_8

13 messages 2006/11/09

[#9515] External entropy pool for random number generator — "Kirill Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>

In the attachment patch which allow to use external entropy pool for

13 messages 2006/11/11
[#9522] Re: External entropy pool for random number generator — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/11/13

Hi,

[#9554] Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

I've been thinking about how version numbers are restricting what we can do.

30 messages 2006/11/16
[#9561] Re: Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/11/16

[#9563] Re: Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/11/16

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#9564] Re: Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/11/16

On Nov 16, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Hugh Sasse wrote:

[#9571] Re: Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond. — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2006/11/19

On 11/16/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#9604] #ancestors never includes the singleton class (inconsistent) — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6820, was opened at 2006-11-22 08:49

12 messages 2006/11/22
[#9618] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6820 ] #ancestors never includes the singleton class (inconsistent) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/11/25

Hi,

[#9629] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6820 ] #ancestors never includes the singleton class (inconsistent) — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2006/11/27

> It is supposed to. Singleton classes (or eigenclasses, if you want to

[ ruby-Bugs-6513 ] RDoc: f95_parser needs patch to rdoc/option.rb

From: <noreply@...>
Date: 2006-11-06 05:30:26 UTC
List: ruby-core #9401
Bugs item #6513, was opened at 2006-11-06 00:30
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=6513&group_id=426

Category: Standard Library
Group: 1.8.5
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Bil Kleb (kleb)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: RDoc: f95_parser needs patch to rdoc/option.rb

Initial Comment:
1.8.5 RDoc fails to parse Fortran 95 files due to option.rb
and code_objects.rb not having the magic ignore_case
method/argument from Dennou club's monster patch?

For example,

$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [powerpc-darwin8.7.0]

$ cat > use_mod.f90
module test_f95parser
 use other_module
contains
 subroutine foobar
 end subroutine
end module

$ rdoc use_mod.f90 

                        use_mod.f90: m/usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:403:in `parse_program_or_module': undefined method `ignore_case' for #<Options:0x1118fcc> (NoMethodError)
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:306:in `scan'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:233:in `collect!'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:233:in `scan'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:210:in `parse_files'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:203:in `each'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:203:in `parse_files'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:246:in `document'
        from /usr/local/bin/rdoc:63

where parse_f95.rb looks like

    403         if !container.include_includes?(used_mod_name, @options.ignore_case)
    404           progress "."
    405           container.add_include Include.new(used_mod_name, "")
    406         end

Or, a simpler case,

$ cat > test.f90
program f90 
 print *, 'hello'
end

$ rdoc test.f90
                           test.f90: p/usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:473:in `parse_program_or_module': undefined method `each_includes' for #<RDoc::TopLevel:0x111889c> (NoMethodError)
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:333:in `scan'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:233:in `collect!'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/parsers/parse_f95.rb:233:in `scan'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:210:in `parse_files'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:203:in `each'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:203:in `parse_files'
        from /usr/local/pkgs/ruby-1.8.5/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/rdoc.rb:246:in `document'
        from /usr/local/bin/rdoc:63

where parse_f95.rb looks like

    473       container.each_includes{ |inc|
    474         TopLevel.all_files.each do |name, toplevel|
    475           indicated_mod = toplevel.find_symbol(inc.name,
    476                                                nil, @options.ignore_case)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=6513&group_id=426

In This Thread

Prev Next