From: Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>
Date: 2006-11-20T15:30:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.[89].\d+ and beyond.

> What if we need to exceed 1.8.9?
I guess the XP people would say: Let's see if we really run into that
problem :) (and write more tests in the meanwhile.)

But the question is surely interesting. I vote for 1.8.10.
[murphy]