[#6864] ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — "Ara.T.Howard" <ara.t.howard@...>

20 messages 2005/12/09
[#6870] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...> 2005/12/12

Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#6872] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — ara.t.howard@... 2005/12/12

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, [ISO-8859-15] Florian Growrote:

[#6873] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/12/12

On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:19 PM, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#6874] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — ara.t.howard@... 2005/12/12

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6891] Time.utc! and Time.localtime! — Daniel Hobe <hobe@...>

Writing a script yesterday I found out, much to my surprise, that the

16 messages 2005/12/14

[#6918] change to yaml in 1.8.4 — ara.t.howard@...

14 messages 2005/12/16

[#6934] 1.8.x, YAML, and release management — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'm concerned that 1.8.3's acceptance of non-backwards-compatible

28 messages 2005/12/18

[#6996] Problems building 1.8.4 with VS8 C++ Express Edition (cl 14.00) — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Visual Studio C++ 2005 Express Edition (VS 8.0)

20 messages 2005/12/27

Re: Array Documentation Issues

From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2005-12-20 19:40:18 UTC
List: ruby-core #6969
On Dec 20, 2005, at 12:58 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Array Documentation Issues"
>     on Wed, 21 Dec 2005 01:46:41 +0900, James Edward Gray II  
> <james@grayproductions.net> writes:
>
> |Let's start with:
> |
> |$ ri -T Array.indices
> |----------------------------------------------------------  
> Array#indices
> |      array.indexes( i1, i2, ... iN )   -> an_array
> |      array.indices( i1, i2, ... iN )   -> an_array
> |--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> |      Deprecated; use Array#select.
> |
> |To me, that reads similar to "Bathtub out-of-order, use nearest
> |sink."  Can we switch that to
> |"use Array#values_at"?  I think that's a much closer fit.
>
> This is a bug in a document.  I will fix it soon.

Thanks much.

James Edward Gray II

In This Thread