[#6864] ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — "Ara.T.Howard" <ara.t.howard@...>

20 messages 2005/12/09
[#6870] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...> 2005/12/12

Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#6872] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — ara.t.howard@... 2005/12/12

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, [ISO-8859-15] Florian Growrote:

[#6873] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/12/12

On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:19 PM, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#6874] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — ara.t.howard@... 2005/12/12

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6891] Time.utc! and Time.localtime! — Daniel Hobe <hobe@...>

Writing a script yesterday I found out, much to my surprise, that the

16 messages 2005/12/14

[#6918] change to yaml in 1.8.4 — ara.t.howard@...

14 messages 2005/12/16

[#6934] 1.8.x, YAML, and release management — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'm concerned that 1.8.3's acceptance of non-backwards-compatible

28 messages 2005/12/18

[#6996] Problems building 1.8.4 with VS8 C++ Express Edition (cl 14.00) — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Visual Studio C++ 2005 Express Edition (VS 8.0)

20 messages 2005/12/27

Re: change to yaml in 1.8.4

From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2005-12-19 03:36:07 UTC
List: ruby-core #6948
On Dec 18, 2005, at 7:37 PM, Jim Weirich wrote:

> On Friday 16 December 2005 11:17 pm, Tom Copeland wrote:
>> Cool.  Hm.  Maybe I'll upgrade RubyForge to 1.8.4p2 and see if that
>> sorts things out... thanks for the info!
>
> This only pushes the problems out to users who have not yet  
> upgraded.  That
> means that gems won't load on every system and that's *not* a good  
> idea IMHO.

Good call.

Why's voice is absent in all of this?  He is the YAML guy, right?  I  
wonder if he is aware of this thread or if we need to point it out...

James Edward Gray II

In This Thread