ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#7039] Call to NoMethodError#message hangs ruby — noreply@...

Bugs item #3160, was opened at 2006-01-01 09:53

2 messages 2006/01/01

[#7042] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3160 ] Call to NoMethodError#message hangs ruby — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/01/02

Hi.

[#7043] RUBYOPT versioning? — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...>

Matz, others:

4 messages 2006/01/02

[#7044] Re: RUBYOPT versioning? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2006/01/02

On 02/01/06, Caleb Tennis <caleb@aei-tech.com> wrote:

[#7045] Re: RUBYOPT versioning? — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/02

>

[#7046] Re: RUBYOPT versioning? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/01/02

On Jan 2, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Caleb Tennis wrote:

[#7050] RDoc patches for BigDecimal in Ruby CVS — mathew <meta@...>

Now that 1.8.4 is out and the initial flurry of problem reports has died

4 messages 2006/01/03

[#7131] Re: RDoc patches for BigDecimal in Ruby CVS — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2006/01/13

More than a week and no response, so... "bump".

[#7136] Re: RDoc patches for BigDecimal in Ruby CVS — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/01/13

Hi.

[#7201] Re: RDoc patches for BigDecimal in Ruby CVS — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/24

H.Yamamoto wrote:

[#7051] enum.find with ifnone calls ifnone process even if find succeeds — noreply@...

Bugs item #3175, was opened at 2006-01-03 19:49

2 messages 2006/01/04

[#7052] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3175 ] enum.find with ifnone calls ifnone process even if find succeeds — nobu@... 2006/01/04

Hi,

[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05

[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7066] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2006/01/06

On 05/01/06, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:

[#7069] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2006/01/06

On 06/01/06, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:

[#7085] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/10

Hi,

[#7086] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2006/01/10

On 09/01/06, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:

[#7088] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — Curt Hibbs <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/01/10

On 1/9/06, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:

[#7090] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2006/01/10

On 09/01/06, Curt Hibbs <ml.chibbs@gmail.com> wrote:

[#7095] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — Curt Hibbs <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/01/10

On 1/9/06, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:

[#7094] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/10

Hi,

[#7174] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2006/01/18

On 10/01/06, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:

[#7175] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/18

Hi,

[#7087] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/01/10

Hello,

[#7060] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/01/06

Hello,

[#7062] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7063] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/01/06

Hello,

[#7064] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7056] Newbie question — mac <mtscolony@...>

Hello all and happy new year.

3 messages 2006/01/05

[#7059] Re: Newbie question — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/01/06

Jan 5, 2006, at 2:59 PM, mac wrote:

[#7061] Re: Newbie question — mac <mtscolony@...> 2006/01/06

thanks, i will post it there.

[#7057] 64-bit Solaris READ_DATA_PENDING Revisited — Steven Lumos <steven@...>

2 messages 2006/01/06

[#7065] Re: 64-bit Solaris READ_DATA_PENDING Revisited — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/01/06

[#7067] Re: 64-bit Solaris READ_DATA_PENDING Revisited — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/01/06

[#7068] Re: 64-bit Solaris READ_DATA_PENDING Revisited — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2006/01/06

[#7070] ruby interpreter crashes with invalid input — noreply@...

Bugs item #3195, was opened at 2006-01-06 20:22

2 messages 2006/01/06

[#7071] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3195 ] ruby interpreter crashes with invalid input — nobu@... 2006/01/07

Hi,

[#7072] YAML and '---' doc separatore — "Ara.T.Howard" <ara.t.howard@...>

2 messages 2006/01/07

[#7073] Re: YAML and '---' doc separatore — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/01/07

On Jan 7, 2006, at 9:26 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#7074] Wilderness: Version 2.1 of IDBG - Fixes for Multiple File Debugging — Charles Thornton <ruby-core@...>

I will post the latest 'tar' (idbg_2.1_tar.tgz) on

1 message 2006/01/08

[#7075] typo in webrick — noreply@...

Bugs item #3211, was opened at 2006-01-08 21:21

1 message 2006/01/08

[#7076] Readline does not provide enough context to the completion_proc — noreply@...

Bugs item #3212, was opened at 2006-01-09 17:44

1 message 2006/01/09

[#7077] Fast Ruby Debugger? — Joseph Moore <joe.moore@...>

After developing in Java for years in IDEs I'm starving for a decent ruby

2 messages 2006/01/09

[#7081] Re: Fast Ruby Debugger? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/01/09

[#7078] CRC - a proof-of-concept Ruby compiler — Anders Hkersten <chucky@...>

Hello everyone,

6 messages 2006/01/09

[#7079] Re: CRC - a proof-of-concept Ruby compiler — Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@...> 2006/01/09

Anders H旦ckersten wrote:

[#7080] Re: CRC - a proof-of-concept Ruby compiler — Anders Hkersten <chucky@...> 2006/01/09

tis 2006-01-10 klockan 02:16 +0900 skrev Nicolas Cannasse:

[#7093] Re: CRC - a proof-of-concept Ruby compiler — Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@...> 2006/01/10

> Nicolas,

[#7082] Re: CRC - a proof-of-concept Ruby compiler — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2006/01/09

Anders Hkersten <chucky@dtek.chalmers.se> writes:

[#7083] Re: CRC - a proof-of-concept Ruby compiler — "Andreas Farre" <d00farre@...> 2006/01/09

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10

[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7099] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Dean Wampler <deanwampler@...> 2006/01/11

Let me suggest an XP-style alternative; make thorough unit tests

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7123] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/01/12

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, mathew wrote:

[#7124] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/01/12

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#7125] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — James Britt <ruby@...> 2006/01/12

ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#7126] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/01/12

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, James Britt wrote:

[#7127] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — James Britt <ruby@...> 2006/01/12

ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#7133] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/01/13

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, James Britt wrote:

[#7140] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/01/13

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#7128] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/01/12

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, mathew wrote:

[#7130] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Dean Wampler <deanwampler@...> 2006/01/12

I'm not sure I follow you exactly, but I think I more or less agree ;)

[#7119] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Dean Wampler <deanwampler@...> 2006/01/12

Sorry, but I think you don't understand the purpose of Test Driven

[#7121] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/01/12

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, mathew wrote:

[#7142] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/13

Dean Wampler <deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7144] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Dean Wampler <deanwampler@...> 2006/01/13

On 1/13/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#7145] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/01/13

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, mathew wrote:

[#7147] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/01/14

--- Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:

[#7148] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/01/14

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7149] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/01/14

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Hugh Sasse wrote:

[#7100] core dump with ruby 1.9.0 (2006-01-10) and bdb-0.5.8 — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found following test script dumps core.

6 messages 2006/01/11

[#7101] Re: core dump with ruby 1.9.0 (2006-01-10) and bdb-0.5.8 — ts <decoux@...> 2006/01/11

>>>>> "T" == Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> writes:

[#7102] Re: core dump with ruby 1.9.0 (2006-01-10) and bdb-0.5.8 — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/01/11

In article <200601110905.k0B950Op001713@moulon.inra.fr>,

[#7103] Re: core dump with ruby 1.9.0 (2006-01-10) and bdb-0.5.8 — ts <decoux@...> 2006/01/11

>>>>> "T" == Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> writes:

[#7104] Re: core dump with ruby 1.9.0 (2006-01-10) and bdb-0.5.8 — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/01/11

Hi.

[#7108] Re: core dump with ruby 1.9.0 (2006-01-10) and bdb-0.5.8 — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/01/11

In article <200601110953.k0B9rRN2005865@moulon.inra.fr>,

[#7105] win32ole bug 'method missing': DisableAutoMacros (WIN32OLERuntimeError) — noreply@...

Bugs item #3237, was opened at 2006-01-11 13:13

1 message 2006/01/11

[#7106] Re: 64-bit Solaris READ_DATA_PENDING Revisited — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2006/01/11

[#7107] Re: 64-bit Solaris READ_DATA_PENDING Revisited — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2006/01/11

ville.mattila@stonesoft.com writes:

[#7109] Calling flock with block? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2006/01/11

[#7111] Re: Calling flock with block? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/01/11

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Bertram Scharpf wrote:

[#7114] Re: Calling flock with block? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2006/01/12

Hi,

[#7112] Re: Calling flock with block? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/01/11

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#7113] Re: Calling flock with block? — ara.t.howard@... 2006/01/12

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#7115] Re: Calling flock with block? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2006/01/12

Hi,

[#7117] Re: Calling flock with block? — ara.t.howard@... 2006/01/12

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Bertram Scharpf wrote:

[#7110] 1.9 dl w/o cdecl/stdcall — Steven Lumos <steven@...>

1 message 2006/01/11

[#7116] Re: 64-bit Solaris READ_DATA_PENDING Revisited — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/01/12

[#7122] irb attempts to escape '\c' inside single quotes — noreply@...

Bugs item #3245, was opened at 2006-01-12 13:41

1 message 2006/01/12

[#7129] YAML.load({[]=>""}.to_yaml) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found that current YAML doesn't round trip {[]=>""}.

9 messages 2006/01/12

[#7135] Re: YAML.load({[]=>""}.to_yaml) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/01/13

Hi.

[#7154] Re: YAML.load({[]=>""}.to_yaml) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/01/15

Hi.

[#7155] Re: YAML.load({[]=>""}.to_yaml) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/01/15

In article <20060115202203.D3624CA0.ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp>,

[#7156] Re: YAML.load({[]=>""}.to_yaml) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/01/15

Hi.

[#7157] Re: YAML.load({[]=>""}.to_yaml) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/01/15

In article <20060115204235.E6E219E0.ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp>,

[#7158] Re: YAML.load({[]=>""}.to_yaml) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/01/15

Hi.

[#7159] Re: YAML.load({[]=>""}.to_yaml) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/01/15

Hi.

[#7163] Re: YAML.load({[]=>""}.to_yaml) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/01/16

Hi.

[#7137] RDoc: cannot create diagram if only dir.c is specified — noreply@...

Bugs item #3247, was opened at 2006-01-13 10:47

1 message 2006/01/13

[#7138] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

Hello,

3 messages 2006/01/13

[#7151] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/01/14

In article <OFDC7A1FAA.CD90E9D1-ONC22570F5.004629FE-C22570F5.00470914@stonesoft.com>,

[#7270] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/01

Hello.

[#7139] Building fat binaries on Mac OS X — Neil Stevens <neil@...>

Hello,

1 message 2006/01/13

[#7150] Array#[] with float indices — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

2 messages 2006/01/14

[#7152] Re: Array#[] with float indices — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/01/14

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#7153] Regular Expression Support, Defined by Unicode UTS#18 Requirements — Wolfgang N疆asi-Donner <wonado@...>

I have a question regarding future Ruby versions, that is the versions 2.x

1 message 2006/01/14

[#7160] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...>

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com>

1 message 2006/01/15

[#7161] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...>

*Hugh Sasse *<hgs dmu.ac.uk>:

1 message 2006/01/15

[#7162] FileUtils.mv does not unlink source file when moving over filesystem boundary — Pav Lucistnik <pav@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2006/01/16

[#7166] Re: FileUtils.mv does not unlink source file when moving over filesystem boundary — ara.t.howard@... 2006/01/16

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Pav Lucistnik wrote:

[#7167] Re: FileUtils.mv does not unlink source file when moving over filesystem boundary — Jacob Fugal <lukfugl@...> 2006/01/16

On 1/16/06, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov <ara.t.howard@noaa.gov> wrote:

[#7168] Re: FileUtils.mv does not unlink source file when moving over filesystem boundary — ara.t.howard@... 2006/01/16

On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Jacob Fugal wrote:

[#7164] Re: Regular Expression Support, Defined by Unicode UTS#18 Requirements — "K.Kosako" <sndgk393@...>

**> I have a question regarding future Ruby versions, that is the

2 messages 2006/01/16

[#7165] Re: Regular Expression Support, Defined by Unicode UTS#18 Requirements — "Wolfgang Nadasi-Donner" <wonado@...> 2006/01/16

Thank you for the information. It is very helpful to know the properties of

[#7169] YAML produces many warnings — noreply@...

Bugs item #3264, was opened at 2006-01-16 19:27

1 message 2006/01/17

[#7170] Problem with Ruby/DL and double arguments (non-x86) — noreply@...

Bugs item #3267, was opened at 2006-01-17 13:37

1 message 2006/01/17

[#7171] yaml and Bignum — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/6131

4 messages 2006/01/17

[#7172] Re: yaml and Bignum — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/01/17

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#7173] Re: yaml and Bignum — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/01/17

Hi.

[#7176] Re: yaml and Bignum — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/01/19

[#7177] Still $SAFE — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2006/01/20

[#7258] Re: Still $SAFE — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/01/31

Hi,

[#7178] Add XHTML 1.0 Output Support to Ruby CGI — Paul Duncan <pabs@...>

The attached patch against Ruby 1.8.4 adds XHTML 1.0 output support to

5 messages 2006/01/20

[#7180] Re: [PATCH] Add XHTML 1.0 Output Support to Ruby CGI — James Britt <ruby@...> 2006/01/21

Paul Duncan wrote:

[#7182] Improved XHTML 1.0 Output (was Re: [PATCH] Add XHTML 1.0 Output Support to Ruby CGI) — Paul Duncan <pabs@...> 2006/01/21

* James Britt (ruby@jamesbritt.com) wrote:

[#7192] Re: [PATCH] Add XHTML 1.0 Output Support to Ruby CGI — Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb@...> 2006/01/23

On 1/21/06, James Britt <ruby@jamesbritt.com> wrote:

[#7193] Re: [PATCH] Add XHTML 1.0 Output Support to Ruby CGI — Paul Duncan <pabs@...> 2006/01/23

* Wilson Bilkovich (wilsonb@gmail.com) wrote:

[#7181] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/01/21

[#7183] irb cannot parse /\^/ — noreply@...

Bugs item #3302, was opened at 2006-01-23 02:43

1 message 2006/01/22

[#7184] BigMath::log speedup patch — C Erler <erlercw@...>

Someone else submitted a BigMath::log speedup at

1 message 2006/01/22

[#7185] Wilderness: NODE Obj and Class Obj --- Can they be ID'ed by inspection? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I think I know the answer, but...

2 messages 2006/01/23

[#7194] Re: Wilderness: NODE Obj and Class Obj --- Can they be ID'ed by inspection? — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2006/01/23

On Jan 23, 2006, at 12:43 AM, Charles Thornton wrote:

[#7186] Ruby 1.9 and FHS — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>

Build and install system changes:

6 messages 2006/01/23

[#7187] Re: [PATCH] Ruby 1.9 and FHS — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2006/01/23

On 23/01/06, Kirill A. Shutemov <k.shutemov@sam-solutions.net> wrote:

[#7188] Re: [PATCH] Ruby 1.9 and FHS — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2006/01/23

On 22:25 Mon 23 Jan, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#7189] Re: [PATCH] Ruby 1.9 and FHS — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2006/01/23

On 23/01/06, Kirill A. Shutemov <k.shutemov@sam-solutions.net> wrote:

[#7190] Re: [PATCH] Ruby 1.9 and FHS — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2006/01/23

On 1/23/06, Kirill A. Shutemov <k.shutemov@sam-solutions.net> wrote:

[#7191] Re: [PATCH] Ruby 1.9 and FHS — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2006/01/23

On 23/01/06, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#7195] trouble due ruby redefining posix function eaccess — noreply@...

Bugs item #3317, was opened at 2006-01-24 15:33

5 messages 2006/01/24

[#7204] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3317 ] trouble due ruby redefining posix function eaccess — nobu@... 2006/01/25

Hi,

[#7206] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3317 ] trouble due ruby redefining posix function eaccess — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2006/01/25

On 25/01/06, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#7207] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3317 ] trouble due ruby redefining posix function eaccess — Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...> 2006/01/25

On 2006-01-26 00:03:27 +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#7214] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3317 ] trouble due ruby redefining posix function eaccess — nobu@... 2006/01/26

Hi,

[#7196] net/https does not submit RFC compliant requests — noreply@...

Bugs item #3318, was opened at 2006-01-24 16:52

1 message 2006/01/24

[#7197] SSL-enabled DRb fds on SSLError? — ctm@... (Clifford T. Matthews)

Howdy,

8 messages 2006/01/24

[#7198] Re: SSL-enabled DRb fds on SSLError? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/01/24

On Jan 24, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Clifford T. Matthews wrote:

[#7199] Re: SSL-enabled DRb fds on SSLError? — ctm@... (Clifford T. Matthews) 2006/01/24

>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> writes:

[#7200] Re: SSL-enabled DRb fds on SSLError? — ctm@... (Clifford T. Matthews) 2006/01/24

Patch worked fine against HEAD.

[#7202] Re: SSL-enabled DRb fds on SSLError? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/01/24

On Jan 24, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Clifford T. Matthews wrote:

[#7213] Re: SSL-enabled DRb fds on SSLError? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/01/26

Hi,

[#7221] Re: SSL-enabled DRb fds on SSLError? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/01/26

On Jan 25, 2006, at 5:10 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#7225] Re: SSL-enabled DRb fds on SSLError? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/01/28

Hi,

[#7203] bcc32's memory manager bug — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>

Hi.

1 message 2006/01/25

[#7205] Launching Ruby scripts and the future of MVM — Charles O Nutter <headius@...>

Hello again from the JRuby project!

2 messages 2006/01/25

[#7418] Fwd: Launching Ruby scripts and the future of MVM — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/02/23

I wrote this email about a month ago, suggesting a core Kernel method

[#7208] bug - Ruby 1.8.4 Stack problem — Doug Bryant <bryant.doug@...>

I recently upgraded from 1.8.2 to 1.8.4 and am encountering core dumps

3 messages 2006/01/25

[#7209] Re: bug - Ruby 1.8.4 Stack problem — Pav Lucistnik <pav@...> 2006/01/25

Doug Bryant p晥e v 鑼 26. 01. 2006 v 02:28 +0900:

[#7210] Re: bug - Ruby 1.8.4 Stack problem — Doug Bryant <bryant.doug@...> 2006/01/25

Thanks Pav. Running against the build without pthreads fixed the

[#7211] Some troubles with an embedded ruby interpreter — Matt Mower <matt.mower@...>

Hi folks,

4 messages 2006/01/25

[#7215] Re: Some troubles with an embedded ruby interpreter — wvdbos@... 2006/01/26

[#7219] Re: Some troubles with an embedded ruby interpreter — Matt Mower <matt.mower@...> 2006/01/26

Hi Wim,

[#7212] Re: Some troubles with an embedded ruby interpreter — Matt Mower <matt.mower@...> 2006/01/26

Hrmm...

[#7216] String#scan loops forefever if scanned string is modified inside block. — noreply@...

Bugs item #3329, was opened at 2006-01-26 10:55

3 messages 2006/01/26

[#7220] Clarify String#scan Documentation (was Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3329 ] String#scan loops forefever if scanned string is modified inside block.) — Paul Duncan <pabs@...> 2006/01/26

* noreply@rubyforge.org (noreply@rubyforge.org) wrote:

[#7222] Re: [PATCH] Clarify String#scan Documentation (was Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3329 ] String#scan loops forefever if scanned string is modified inside block.) — nobu@... 2006/01/27

Hi,

[#7217] YAML segfault when loading unknown subclass of builtin class — noreply@...

Bugs item #3331, was opened at 2006-01-26 09:42

1 message 2006/01/26

[#7218] YAML cannot restore instance variable of subclass of Hash/Array/String — noreply@...

Bugs item #3332, was opened at 2006-01-26 09:55

1 message 2006/01/26

[#7223] RDoc.usage doesn't parse caller correctly on windows — noreply@...

Bugs item #3344, was opened at 2006-01-27 14:26

2 messages 2006/01/27

[#7224] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3344 ] RDoc.usage doesn't parse caller correctly on windows — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/27

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28

[#7227] Re: Question about massive API changes — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2006/01/28

On 1/28/06, Sean E. Russell <ser@germane-software.com> wrote:

[#7231] Re: Question about massive API changes — dblack@... 2006/01/28

Hi --

[#7248] Re: Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2006/01/30

Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#7253] Re: Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — Jacob Fugal <lukfugl@...> 2006/01/31

On 1/30/06, Charles Thornton <ceo@hawthorne-press.com> wrote:

[#7255] Re: Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — Ben Schumacher <benschumacher@...> 2006/01/31

On 1/30/06, Jacob Fugal <lukfugl@gmail.com> wrote:

[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

[#7233] Re: Question about massive API changes — Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb@...> 2006/01/28

On 1/28/06, Caleb Tennis <caleb@aei-tech.com> wrote:

[#7234] Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2006/01/28

On Saturday 28 January 2006 17:13, Wilson Bilkovich wrote:

[#7238] Re: Question about massive API changes — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/01/29

--- "Sean E. Russell" <ser@germane-software.com>

[#7239] Re: Question about massive API changes — Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb@...> 2006/01/29

On 1/28/06, Sean E. Russell <ser@germane-software.com> wrote:

[#7242] Re: Question about massive API changes — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/29

Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#7252] Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2006/01/31

On Sunday 29 January 2006 15:56, mathew wrote:

[#7267] Re: Question about massive API changes — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/31

Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#7269] Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2006/02/01

On Tuesday 31 January 2006 14:44, mathew wrote:

[#7299] Re: Question about massive API changes — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/02/03

On Jan 31, 2006, at 9:06 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#7237] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

[#7241] Re: Question about massive API changes — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/29

Wilson Bilkovich wrote:

[#7229] Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2006/01/28

On Saturday 28 January 2006 08:41, Caleb Tennis wrote:

[#7230] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

[#7232] Re: Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — dblack@... 2006/01/28

Hi --

[#7236] Re: Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/01/28

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

[#7235] Re: Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2006/01/28

On Saturday 28 January 2006 12:26, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

[#7240] Ruby 1.8.4 parse errors — noreply@...

Bugs item #3361, was opened at 2006-01-29 17:09

1 message 2006/01/29

[#7243] waking up a Ruby thread asynchronously? — Joshua Haberman <joshua@...>

I am writing a C extension for Ruby that wraps a networking API. I

1 message 2006/01/29

[#7244] Ruby IPC — Marc Soda <marcantoniosr@...>

Hello all,

3 messages 2006/01/30

[#7246] Re: Ruby IPC — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/01/30

Marc Soda wrote:

[#7245] Re: Ruby IPC — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/01/30

On Jan 29, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Marc Soda wrote:

[#7247] More relaxed checking for XML RPC Content-Type value — noreply@...

Bugs item #3367, was opened at 2006-01-30 12:51

1 message 2006/01/30

[#7249] PATCH: append option to sysread — Yohanes Santoso <ysantoso-rubycore@...>

6 messages 2006/01/30

[#7257] Re: PATCH: append option to sysread — Phil Tomson <rubyfan@...> 2006/01/31

On 1/30/06, Yohanes Santoso <ysantoso-rubycore@jenny-gnome.dyndns.org> wrote:

[#7250] Re: PATCH: append option to sysread — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/01/30

In article <87k6ch72xu.fsf@jenny-gnome.dyndns.org>,

[#7251] Re: PATCH: append option to sysread — Yohanes Santoso <ysantoso-rubycore@...> 2006/01/31

Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> writes:

[#7263] Re: PATCH: append option to sysread — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/01/31

In article <87bqxt6xy8.fsf@jenny-gnome.dyndns.org>,

[#7268] Re: PATCH: append option to sysread -- retracted — Yohanes Santoso <ysantoso-rubycore@...> 2006/01/31

Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> writes:

[#7254] Struct#select behavior vs rdoc — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

% ri Struct#select

2 messages 2006/01/31

[#7256] Re: Struct#select behavior vs rdoc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/01/31

Hi,

[#7259] TCP/UDP server weird lags on 1.8.4 linux — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...>

Hi !

6 messages 2006/01/31

[#7262] Re: TCP/UDP server weird lags on 1.8.4 linux — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/31

>

[#7261] Re: TCP/UDP server weird lags on 1.8.4 linux — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/01/31

> $bg_print_thread = Thread.new { loop{ $errlog.log("bg_print_thread"); sleep(0.1) } }

[#7264] Re: TCP/UDP server weird lags on 1.8.4 linux — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/01/31

Hi Caleb,

[#7265] Re: TCP/UDP server weird lags on 1.8.4 linux — "Caleb Tennis" <caleb@...> 2006/01/31

[#7266] Re: TCP/UDP server weird lags on 1.8.4 linux — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/01/31

From: "Caleb Tennis" <caleb@aei-tech.com>

[#7260] possible bug - does Socket.gethostbyname behave correctly? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

Socket.gethostbyname gethostbyname(3), which is surprising. It can

3 messages 2006/01/31

[#7309] Re: possible bug - does Socket.gethostbyname behave correctly? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/06

Hi,

[#7312] Re: possible bug - does Socket.gethostbyname behave correctly? — Marc <marcantoniosr@...> 2006/02/07

On 2/6/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Ruby 1.8.4 RDoc HTML Cleanups and HTML Language Support

From: "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>

Date: 2006-01-13 10:28:15 UTC

List: ruby-core #7134

>> I have reviewed your patch, and have noticed two things.
>> 
>>   1. In your patch, xml:lang is specified in HTML4.01. Is this allowed?
>
>I think most browsers ignore attributes that they don't understand.  So,
>is it correct?  Probably not.  Will it cause problems?  Probably not.
>Does it matter?  Not really; the HTML produced with the patch is
>certainly more valid than the HTML produced without it.

Yes, and most browsers can parse <img ....> without end tag.
Why is this not good? because it's not valid xhtml. On the other hand xml:lang
is using xml namespace, so I think this is not valid html4.

>>        in lib\rdoc\generators\template\html\old_html.rb
>> 
>>        <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
>>        <html lang="%html_lang%" xml:lang="%html_lang%">
>> 
>>   2. If either charset or html_lang is not specified,
>> 
>>        rdoc ..\ruby_1_8\array.c --charset=SHIFT_JIS -o \temp
>> 
>>      I get
>> 
>>        <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en-US" xml:lang="en-US">
>>        <head>
>>          <title>RDoc Documentation</title>
>>          <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=SHIFT_JIS" />
>> 
>>      But this is strange. I think
>> 
>>        <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
>>        <head>
>>          <title>RDoc Documentation</title>
>>          <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=SHIFT_JIS" />
>> 
>>      is more reasonable.
>
>The HTML produced before my patch had 'lang="en"' hard-coded.  From the
>patch itself:
>
>  -<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
>  +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="%html_lang%" lang="%html_lang%">
>
>I'm not disagreeing that this behavior isn't strange, just that it was
>worse before (at least now it's configurable).

Yes, but how about this?

Index: lib/rdoc/generators/template/html/one_page_html.rb
===================================================================
RCS file: /src/ruby/lib/rdoc/generators/template/html/one_page_html.rb,v
retrieving revision 1.1.2.2
diff -u -r1.1.2.2 one_page_html.rb
--- lib/rdoc/generators/template/html/one_page_html.rb  24 Mar 2004 17:01:11 -00
00      1.1.2.2
+++ lib/rdoc/generators/template/html/one_page_html.rb  7 Jan 2006 08:38:55 -000
0
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@

 ONE_PAGE = %{
 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
-<html>
+<html lang="%html_lang%" xml:lang="%html_lang%">
 <head>
   <title>%title%</title>
   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=%charset%" />

Anyway, I'm not RDoc maintainer, I cannot decide intruducing new option.
I'll fix invalid xhtml error first based on your patch.

Regards,
Yamamoto

Attachments (1)

patch.zip (2.82 KB, Archive)

Thread

In This Thread